What are you watching this summer?

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38093
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#541 Postby Brent » Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:42 pm

Golden Globes scheduled for Sunday cancelled. The entire event!

http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/e ... cancelled/

URGENT! I've just obtained the unofficial NBC schedule for the Golden Globes on January 13th:

"There will be a press conference this afternoon announcing that the Globes Awards ceremony will not go on. Here is the plan:
At 9 PM there will be a press conference covered by NBC News announcing the Golden Globe winners. (9pm-10pm)
At 8 PM, we are negotiating with Dick Clark Enterprises for a one-hour retrospective/clip show.
At 7 PM, we will air a Dateline with clips and interviews with nominees. (Currently scheduled to air for two hours on Saturday night.)
At 10 PM, we will broadcast an "Access Hollywood" style, Golden Globes party show...visiting the various parties in Hollywood
So the Hollywood writers strike can now claim its first awards show casualty. I'm hearing from my sources that NBC will not be broadcasting the big Golden Globes show as planned for January 13th. Nor will even a full frills unbroadcasted dinner party be held, either. Instead, a stripped down news telecast will be aired exclusively by NBC News from the Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, site of what was supposed to be the big show, where the Hollywood Foreign Press Association will announce the Golden Globe winners who won't be present in the room.

Here's what will happen next: The nominees -- actors, directors, writers, producers, etc -- will have a Red Carpet event outside the Beverly Hilton. Then they'll go inside and attend all the various Golden Globes side parties already planned for each film and TV show. The winners will have the choice of swinging by an HFPA table to pick up their awards and then strolling into a press room for photos and interviews. "It'll now be a news event where the actors can still get all glammed up," a source told me.

I've not yet received any official confirmation of any of this. But insiders tell me that NBC Universal topper Jeff Zucker and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association which bestows the Golden Globes made the decision together to scale everything back into a news event.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#542 Postby GalvestonDuck » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:07 pm

Striking Hollywood Writers Reach Deal With United Artists

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,320846,00.html
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#543 Postby lurkey » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:52 pm

GalvestonDuck wrote:Striking Hollywood Writers Reach Deal With United Artists

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,320846,00.html


Not surprising. They have been talking about doing a deal for a week and half now. . . plus the co-heads of UA are prominent SAG (and pro-WGA) members, so a deal with UA makes WGA look good and strengths ties between SAG and the WGA.

I don't think it hurts the AMPTP too much yet. It begins to hurt the AMPTP when the WGA begins to make a lot of deals with "independent" production companies that are AMPTP members. Though what does make UA deal stand out is the other partner (there are three) is MGM, a major studio. Rumor is that the MGM may be the first "major" studio to fall. The rumors say that there are financial troubles at MGM and they cannot withstand a long strike.

Besides, any deal that is made will be superseded by any deal eventually (probably when hell freezes over at this point) is made between the AMPTP and WGA.

In other news, DGA and AMPTP started preliminary talks today, mainly talks about the talks.
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#544 Postby lurkey » Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:11 pm

SHOWTIME'S CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED DRAMA "DEXTER" PREMIERES SUNDAY, FEB. 17, 10:00-11:00 PM ON THE CBS TELEVISION NETWORK
Released by CBS
[NOTE: The following article is a press release issued by the aforementioned network and/or company. Any errors, typos, etc. are attributed to the original author. The release is reproduced solely for the dissemination of the enclosed information.]

SHOWTIME'S CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED DRAMA "DEXTER" PREMIERES SUNDAY, FEB. 17, 10:00-11:00 PM ON THE CBS TELEVISION NETWORK

In an Unprecedented Move, a Premium Cable Drama To Air on Network Television

DEXTER, the critically acclaimed drama series about a serial killer, which recently completed its second season on premium cable network SHOWTIME, makes an unprecedented appearance on network television when it premieres Sunday, Feb. 17 (10:00-11:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

DEXTER's move to CBS marks the first time a full season of a premium cable drama series will make the transition to network television. DEXTER's 12-episode first season will be edited for network television and will be broadcast on 12 consecutive Sundays.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#545 Postby Cyclenall » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:13 am

I always wondered about the show DEXTER, but the editing will change it quite a bit IMO. For some strange reason, the actor of Dexter has a smile that reminds me of Steve Irwin.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38093
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#546 Postby Brent » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:16 am

:eek:

"The Mole" has come out of hiding.

ABC has given a 10-episode order to Stone & Co. Entertainment ("Tim Gunn's Guide to Style") to revive the reality competish, which hasn't aired in four years.

Casting and pre-production have begun on the show, which will likely start shooting later this spring. ABC is looking to run "The Mole this summer.

"This is a show we honestly love and people ask us about all the time," said ABC Entertainment alternative series senior VP John Saade, who added that plans were afoot to dig out "The Mole" even before the writers' strike.

"We were looking to bring the show back even when the writers were working," he said.

The first two editions of "The Mole," which aired in 2001 and 2002, earned ABC's top marks among adult 18-34 auds in both of those years. ABC then ran two seasons of "Celebrity Mole," in midseason 2003 and 2004.

Stone Stanley Prods., which produced all four "Mole" segs, dissolved in 2004. But principal Scott Stone said he kept a fire burning for the show, and has been looking to revive it under his new shingle for years.

"It was just about getting the timing right," Stone said.

The hiccup: Rights to "The Mole" had reverted back to Belgium company TTTI, which owns the format. Stone, who's repped by WMA, finally managed to close a new deal to license the show two months ago.

"If anyone asks me what my favorite show has been, I've answered 'The Mole,'" Stone said. "Not surprisingly, this has been a passion of mine since the option lapsed three or four years ago. In my staff meeting every week, people would say, 'Don't even bring it up.' I kept throwing it out that it was eventually going to be the right time. And it perennially ends up on lists of people's favorite reality shows. That kept the fires burning inside me."

The revived "Mole" will revert back to the original format, sans celebs.

Show features contestants traveling across a foreign country completing tasks and solving puzzles in order to add money to the winner's pot. At the same time, they're trying to figure out which of their competitors is actually "The Mole" -- a player planted to sabotage the game and limit the money won.

At the end of each episode, players take a quiz; lowest-score sends someone packing. Person who's left standing alongside the Mole wins the money pot -- which could be as much as $1 million, but ultimately came to $510,000 in season one and $636,000 in season two.

Stone said the new version has been simplified, but said he hasn't "dumbed it down."

"We simplified it to where the people at home can play along," he said. "And the quiz will be much shorter than in the past."

Anderson Cooper, who hosted the first two editions, remains at CNN and isn't available to host; Ahmad Rashad, who hosted the celeb editions, hasn't been asked to return. Stone said he's scouting for a host in Cooper's vein.

"We're looking for someone in the Anderson mode, a little mysterious but full of comedy," he said. "It could be a breakout role for someone."

"Celebrity Mole" won an Emmy in 2004 for Outstanding Achievement in Enhanced Television.

:woo:
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#547 Postby Ptarmigan » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:26 am

When was the last time Golden Globe was not aired on TV? I am awaiting the return of Prison Break and Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles.
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#548 Postby lurkey » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:21 am

0 likes   

grentz7721
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 319
Age: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Massillon, OH, US
Contact:

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#549 Postby grentz7721 » Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:01 pm

Looks like some layoffs due to the writers strike.
Last edited by grentz7721 on Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#550 Postby lurkey » Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:19 pm

CBS News and WGA reach an agreement. One strike resolved, one to go . . .


It's not just the below-the-line people hurt by the WGA strike, it's is all the folks whose businesses depend on entertainment industry .. .
0 likes   

Miss Mary

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#551 Postby Miss Mary » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:54 am

Reminder, tonight there are a few new episodes for 2007/08 network TV shows...

My Name is Earl.....................(Earl adjust to life after his prison term)
30 Rock..................(Kenneth gets hooked on caffeine, Liz buys real estate, etc.)
Grey's Anatomy?
ER................... (Abby's back from rehab)



If I missed one, please post it! TV Guide lists Grey's Anatomy as new but my local newspaper TV critic said it was a rerun? I dunno, not a fan but if you are, don't miss GA.

It's just so rare when we get a new episode these days, shows that premiered in 2007 I mean, you can miss the airing. A coworker missed ER last week and I didn't tape it, watched it but didn't record it.

Mary
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#552 Postby GalvestonDuck » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:38 am

lurker_from_nc wrote:It's not just the below-the-line people hurt by the WGA strike, it's is all the folks whose businesses depend on entertainment industry .. .


It's not the strike -- it's the producer's refusal to negotiate. The strike could end if the AMPTP would sit down and talk. So far, the AMPTP's greed has cost the LA economy over $720 million.
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#553 Postby gtalum » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:17 am

GalvestonDuck wrote:It's not the strike -- it's the producer's refusal to negotiate. The strike could end if the AMPTP would sit down and talk. So far, the AMPTP's greed has cost the LA economy over $720 million.


That's a backwards way to look at it. Strikes are solely the fault of strikers. They don't have to strike. Work is being offered at a set wage. If they want higher wages, they just need to look elsewhere. Don't force everyone else to quit working because you feel you're underpaid. I rarely have sympathy for strikers. Unions are a big part of why US manufacturing is headed overseas.
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#554 Postby lurkey » Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:28 am

0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38093
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#555 Postby Brent » Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:25 am

Miss Mary wrote:Reminder, tonight there are a few new episodes for 2007/08 network TV shows...

My Name is Earl.....................(Earl adjust to life after his prison term)
30 Rock..................(Kenneth gets hooked on caffeine, Liz buys real estate, etc.)
Grey's Anatomy?
ER................... (Abby's back from rehab)



If I missed one, please post it! TV Guide lists Grey's Anatomy as new but my local newspaper TV critic said it was a rerun? I dunno, not a fan but if you are, don't miss GA.

It's just so rare when we get a new episode these days, shows that premiered in 2007 I mean, you can miss the airing. A coworker missed ER last week and I didn't tape it, watched it but didn't record it.

Mary


Grey's is new, it's the final episode produced before the strike. :( Ugly Betty is also new(has 2 more left after tonight)
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#556 Postby GalvestonDuck » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:49 pm



That last one makes no sense. The writers aren't getting paid for online video, so they aren't the ones making the price go up.

gtalum wrote:
GalvestonDuck wrote:It's not the strike -- it's the producer's refusal to negotiate. The strike could end if the AMPTP would sit down and talk. So far, the AMPTP's greed has cost the LA economy over $720 million.


That's a backwards way to look at it. Strikes are solely the fault of strikers. They don't have to strike. Work is being offered at a set wage. If they want higher wages, they just need to look elsewhere. Don't force everyone else to quit working because you feel you're underpaid. I rarely have sympathy for strikers. Unions are a big part of why US manufacturing is headed overseas.


That's a non-writers understanding of it...and incorrect. Rates and residuals -- not wages.

First of all, writers don't get wages, they get rate. There are low and high rates for screenplays -- original, adapted, 120-minute, 60-minute, collaborations, 60-minute drama, 120-minute teleplay, 30-minute comedy, and so on. There are different rates for different things.

The writers are NOT fighting for higher rates. They're fighting for more residuals. Residuals are what help fund health care benefits and pension. They already get residuals for re-runs and a small share for DVD sales. They'd like to see the producers give them (as well as others) a fairer share since online video broadcasts cost next to nothing to air via the internet. They aren't asking for prices to increase...they are simply asking for their slice of the pie. The producers are getting paid more and not distributing it among those who create the product (cast, crew, and writers). How is that fair and why shouldn't the guilds fight it?
0 likes   

Miss Mary

#557 Postby Miss Mary » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:22 pm

Each time I hear what the strike is all about (what you explained Duckie), I think the writers deserve this cut. But I just wish something could be done. This season's going to be a wash if they don't settle soon!
0 likes   

User avatar
Pburgh
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5403
Age: 80
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:36 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

#558 Postby Pburgh » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:02 pm

Put this date on your calendar, I AGREE WITH gtalum.
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#559 Postby GalvestonDuck » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:25 pm

Pburgh wrote:Put this date on your calendar, I AGREE WITH gtalum.


Mind if I ask why?
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: What are you watching this winter?

#560 Postby lurkey » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:39 pm

GalvestonDuck wrote:


That last one makes no sense. The writers aren't getting paid for online video, so they aren't the ones making the price go up.

gtalum wrote:
GalvestonDuck wrote:It's not the strike -- it's the producer's refusal to negotiate. The strike could end if the AMPTP would sit down and talk. So far, the AMPTP's greed has cost the LA economy over $720 million.


That's a backwards way to look at it. Strikes are solely the fault of strikers. They don't have to strike. Work is being offered at a set wage. If they want higher wages, they just need to look elsewhere. Don't force everyone else to quit working because you feel you're underpaid. I rarely have sympathy for strikers. Unions are a big part of why US manufacturing is headed overseas.


That's a non-writers understanding of it...and incorrect. Rates and residuals -- not wages.

First of all, writers don't get wages, they get rate. There are low and high rates for screenplays -- original, adapted, 120-minute, 60-minute, collaborations, 60-minute drama, 120-minute teleplay, 30-minute comedy, and so on. There are different rates for different things.

The writers are NOT fighting for higher rates. They're fighting for more residuals. Residuals are what help fund health care benefits and pension. They already get residuals for re-runs and a small share for DVD sales. They'd like to see the producers give them (as well as others) a fairer share since online video broadcasts cost next to nothing to air via the internet. They aren't asking for prices to increase...they are simply asking for their slice of the pie. The producers are getting paid more and not distributing it among those who create the product (cast, crew, and writers). How is that fair and why shouldn't the guilds fight it?


I think they are talking about the value of online video. . .

You are also assuming the online video is just being made by the "Hollywood" establishment. We are also talking about "independent" (independent as made in Hicksville and Fly_over_country, USA) production companies or individuals. They don't belong to any unions or "Hollywood/New York" establishment. They are entrepreneurs. They often write, direct and finance their 5 - 30 minutes videos themselves. The video runs the gamet of fiction to nonfiction to how to do something to just making jacka$$es out of themselves for the world to see. Go to the Video podcast section of iTunes sometime. . look around at the video being produced that is not churned out by the bigwigs in Hollywood and New York. Check for example, The Onion News Network or Stranger Things . ..
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests