#66 Postby coriolis » Fri Aug 03, 2007 7:56 am
It looks like it was a continuous truss, as opposed to a series of simple spans? It's a design solution that provides material savings in construction but as you can see, one failure and the whole thing comes down. Unfotunately a truss design literally has hundreds or thousands of connections, each of which is a potential failure. Plus, continuous spans multiply the thermal movements.
If it is a continuous truss, the inner piers would not be designed for a lot of horizontal thrust. It is conceivable that the falling superstucture could have pulled that pier over.
I know that there's been discussion about two-girder continuous span bridges having low degrees of redundancy also. In this state, I've been seeing P/S concrete beams being used in longer and longer spans. Usually they're multiple girder, simple spans, which have a higher degree of redundancy and would contain a failure.
0 likes