Satellite shot down=Updated Analysis=Fuel Tank was destroyed

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Satellite shot down=Updated Analysis=Fuel Tank was destroyed

#1 Postby cycloneye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:06 pm

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:

Image

Lets hope that all goes well in this operation to send down the broken satellite.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#2 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:13 pm

I wonder if they know where it will land yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#3 Postby cycloneye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:46 pm

fact789 wrote:I wonder if they know where it will land yet.


They are worried about planes that may be in the area of impact that may be far away because of debris.
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: Re:

#4 Postby Coredesat » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:11 pm

cycloneye wrote:
fact789 wrote:I wonder if they know where it will land yet.


They are worried about planes that may be in the area of impact that may be far away because of debris.


Hopefully shooting it down will mitigate that problem somewhat.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Pentagon will shoot down Spy Satellite in early March

#5 Postby cycloneye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:15 pm

The 'shot' -- that’s what Ambassador James Jeffrey called the decision to use an an Aegis SM-3 to try to shoot down satellite USA 193 in the next 3-12 days.

Holding the aside the politics of this — which are terrible — the briefing on debris risk left me cold. I have to say that I am very, very uneasy about this decision — our missile defense tests have been heavily scripted to minimize debris creation and modeling of debris creation isn’t an exact science.


Some are skeptical about the operation

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:

There are some that doubt this will work.See the reactions at link.
0 likes   

User avatar
angelwing
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4462
Age: 64
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:06 pm
Location: Kulpsville, PA

Re: Pentagon will shoot down Spy Satellite in early March

#6 Postby angelwing » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:30 pm

Need something bigger than a tin hat for this one :eek:

I am highly uneasy with this also, it does not bode well with me at all :double:
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#7 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:37 pm

what happens if the missle misses? Will they shoot another missle, and where will the missle go?

I wish we knew where they were gonna shoot it down from,. other than the pacific ocean.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38092
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:

#8 Postby Brent » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:45 pm

fact789 wrote:what happens if the missle misses? Will they shoot another missle, and where will the missle go?

I wish we knew where they were gonna shoot it down from,. other than the pacific ocean.


From the news today there will be 3 different chances if necessary, the first one is a week from today. I don't know how to answer the rest of it.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Pentagon will shoot down Spy Satellite in early March

#9 Postby cycloneye » Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:53 pm

They are going to do the shooting down of the dead satellite in the Northern Pacific Ocean,where there are no islands nor plane lanes.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re: Pentagon will shoot down Spy Satellite in early March

#10 Postby Stephanie » Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:30 pm

Personally, I think it is worth a try. They said that the fuel once released is lethal to those nearby it, not to mention the fact that this thing can kill many if it hits land anywhere.

I think that if we can at least try and mitigate the impact of this satellite then we should do it.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Pentagon will shoot down Spy Satellite in early March

#11 Postby cycloneye » Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:50 pm

Stephanie wrote:Personally, I think it is worth a try. They said that the fuel once released is lethal to those nearby it, not to mention the fact that this thing can kill many if it hits land anywhere.

I think that if we can at least try and mitigate the impact of this satellite then we should do it.


I agree that they have to give it a try.But there are risks in this kind of operation that may turn bad.Lets see when the best moment to do it occurs and see if it is a success.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#12 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:05 pm

Do they really care for the people? Or is it the payload that could potentially reach the earth, and provide top secret intel to other countries? I think it is the second.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#13 Postby cycloneye » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:12 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Do they really care for the people? Or is it the payload that could potentially reach the earth, and provide top secret intel to other countries? I think it is the second.


That is a good point that is very important,because when the dead satellite falls somewhere,someone may steal some debris that may have valuable information.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#14 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Feb 15, 2008 1:16 pm

cycloneye wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Do they really care for the people? Or is it the payload that could potentially reach the earth, and provide top secret intel to other countries? I think it is the second.


That is a good point that is very important,because when the dead satellite falls somewhere,someone may steal some debris that may have valuable information.


provide top secret intel to other countries

We have a winner!!!

I heard Cheney is asking for the priviledge to shoot it down!! j/k
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

Re:

#15 Postby Cookiely » Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:36 pm

fact789 wrote:I wonder if they know where it will land yet.

58.5N and 58.6S which pretty much covers the entire world. I'm not sure they would tell if they did know. More people would died in the evacuation than in staying put. IF they said it is going to fall in the state of Florida on March 6th, what do you think people would do? Not a pretty picture.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#16 Postby senorpepr » Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:27 am

brunota2003 wrote:Do they really care for the people? Or is it the payload that could potentially reach the earth, and provide top secret intel to other countries? I think it is the second.


The data on the satellite itself should not be classified. I would lean more toward the first option.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#17 Postby brunota2003 » Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:59 am

senorpepr wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Do they really care for the people? Or is it the payload that could potentially reach the earth, and provide top secret intel to other countries? I think it is the second.


The data on the satellite itself should not be classified. I would lean more toward the first option.

But the components onboard might provide info to other countries that the gov't doesnt want to risk losing (i.e. parts).
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#18 Postby HURAKAN » Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:26 am

To be realistic, most of the satellite would burn in re-entry.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Re:

#19 Postby senorpepr » Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:10 am

brunota2003 wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Do they really care for the people? Or is it the payload that could potentially reach the earth, and provide top secret intel to other countries? I think it is the second.


The data on the satellite itself should not be classified. I would lean more toward the first option.

But the components onboard might provide info to other countries that the gov't doesnt want to risk losing (i.e. parts).


I wouldn't think so. Granted, I'm not an expert, but from my understanding, the components itself wouldn't be sensitive, but rather the data/imagery the satellite obtained would be. That's not stored on the satellite, so it's really not an issue.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145398
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Pentagon will shoot down Spy Satellite in early March

#20 Postby cycloneye » Sat Feb 16, 2008 2:32 pm

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's Defence Ministry said on Saturday a U.S. plan to shoot down an ailing spy satellite could be used as a cover to test a new space weapon.

The ministry said there was insufficient proof that Washington's decision to fire a missile at the disabled satellite was to prevent a potentially deadly leak of toxic gas as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere.

"In our opinion, the decision to destroy the U.S. satellite is not as harmless as it is being presented. Especially as the United States has been avoiding talks on restricting a space arms race for quite a long time," the ministry's information department said in a statement.


Russia says U.S. Shootdown of Satellite is a test

:uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow: :uarrow:

Hmmm,now Russia is thumbing its nose into this.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests