NK torpedos SK ship

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Derek Ortt

NK torpedos SK ship

#1 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed May 19, 2010 10:07 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#2 Postby Ptarmigan » Wed May 19, 2010 10:35 pm

I am always concerned that war will break out in the Korean peninsula. It is a matter of when. They are in a state of war still.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5885
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#3 Postby MGC » Thu May 20, 2010 1:08 am

I doubt SK will respond with military action. I don't think they have the desire to fight........MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 62
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#4 Postby Stephanie » Thu May 20, 2010 7:32 pm

I wouldn't be surprised if NK tried something else.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#5 Postby Category 5 » Fri May 21, 2010 12:36 pm

There's an act of war right there. Had it been a Chinese or U.S ship NK would be a hole in the ground by now.
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

#6 Postby gtalum » Fri May 21, 2010 12:40 pm

That's why they didn't sink a US or Chinese ship. Kim Jong Il may be crazy, but he's not stupid.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#7 Postby Aslkahuna » Fri May 21, 2010 6:43 pm

Category 5 wrote:There's an act of war right there. Had it been a Chinese or U.S ship NK would be a hole in the ground by now.

Had it been a Chinese ship-yes, NK would have been toast. Had it been one of ours we would bend over backwards apologizing for our ship getting in the way of their torpedo. Why else do you think the ROKs won't do anything, we won't let them.

Steve
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

#8 Postby Cryomaniac » Sun May 23, 2010 12:25 pm

South Korea may be considering military action:

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/nationa ... 0315F.HTML

SEOUL, May 23 (Yonhap) -- President Lee Myung-bak will deliver a public speech on Monday to present Seoul's tough countermeasures against North Korea, which was accused of attacking a South Korean navy vessel in March, his office said Sunday.

"President Lee will present Seoul's position on the attack and further plans, including bringing the case to the United Nations Security Council," Lee Dong-kwan, senior secretary for public affairs at Cheong Wa Dae, told reporters.

"He will make it clear that the South will take firm action if the North conducts any provocations."

Analysts said Lee is considering taking military action against North Korea's provocative actions.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#9 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun May 23, 2010 2:26 pm

Aslkahuna wrote:
Category 5 wrote:There's an act of war right there. Had it been a Chinese or U.S ship NK would be a hole in the ground by now.

Had it been a Chinese ship-yes, NK would have been toast. Had it been one of ours we would bend over backwards apologizing for our ship getting in the way of their torpedo. Why else do you think the ROKs won't do anything, we won't let them.

Steve


I am Korean and America should not tie South Korea's hand. Let South Korea attack North Korea.
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#10 Postby Cryomaniac » Sun May 23, 2010 2:39 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:
Category 5 wrote:There's an act of war right there. Had it been a Chinese or U.S ship NK would be a hole in the ground by now.

Had it been a Chinese ship-yes, NK would have been toast. Had it been one of ours we would bend over backwards apologizing for our ship getting in the way of their torpedo. Why else do you think the ROKs won't do anything, we won't let them.

Steve


I am Korean and America should not tie South Korea's hand. Let South Korea attack North Korea.


Based on some of Clinton's statements, and the article I posted, it seems that may just be the case.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#11 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun May 23, 2010 2:44 pm

U.S. Implicates North Korean Leader in Attack
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/world ... ea.html?hp
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#12 Postby Aslkahuna » Sun May 23, 2010 8:06 pm

Ptarmigan wrote:
Aslkahuna wrote:
Category 5 wrote:There's an act of war right there. Had it been a Chinese or U.S ship NK would be a hole in the ground by now.

Had it been a Chinese ship-yes, NK would have been toast. Had it been one of ours we would bend over backwards apologizing for our ship getting in the way of their torpedo. Why else do you think the ROKs won't do anything, we won't let them.

Steve


I am Korean and America should not tie South Korea's hand. Let South Korea attack North Korea.


I was assigned to Osan AB for a year in the 1960's. Of course the problem is, if war recommences there Seoul will be toast in the first 1/2 hour. The NorKors have a godawful amount of artillery aimed at the city.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#13 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun May 23, 2010 10:55 pm

Aslkahuna wrote:I was assigned to Osan AB for a year in the 1960's. Of course the problem is, if war recommences there Seoul will be toast in the first 1/2 hour. The NorKors have a godawful amount of artillery aimed at the city.

Steve


Seoul would be obliterated if North Korea attacked.
0 likes   

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

#14 Postby Cryomaniac » Mon May 24, 2010 9:27 am

The sensible strategy for any military action by the South is to aim everything at the N.Korean artillery as a number one priority.
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#15 Postby artist » Mon May 24, 2010 10:11 am

U.S. military told to get ready in Korea standoff
Obama orders commanders to prepare 'to deter future aggression'

updated 5:31 a.m. ET, Mon., May 24, 2010


WASHINGTON - The White House said Monday that President Barack Obama "fully supports" the South Korean President and his response to the torpedo attack by North Korea that sank a South Korean naval ship.

In a statement, the White House said Seoul can continue to count on the full backing of the United States and said U.S. military commanders had been told to work with their South Korean counterparts "to ensure readiness and to deter future aggression."
cont'd.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37309788/ns ... siapacific
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: NK torpedos SK ship

#16 Postby Category 5 » Mon May 24, 2010 1:22 pm

Kim Jong Il is out of his mind, honestly, I hope he does torpedo a Chinese ship, that'll solve the NK problem.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

Re:

#17 Postby Aslkahuna » Mon May 24, 2010 3:51 pm

Cryomaniac wrote:The sensible strategy for any military action by the South is to aim everything at the N.Korean artillery as a number one priority.

Much easier said than done since the NorKors have had 57 years to harden their artillery positions against everything including a nuclear strike.

Steve
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#18 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon May 24, 2010 4:24 pm

if we go to war against NK... be prepared for a draft. They have a first rate army. We would win... but we would have tens of thousands dead and SK and large parts of Japan would be obliterated
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

#19 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Mon May 24, 2010 4:38 pm

IMEO(In My Epic Opinion), War is useless. I think NK asked for it, but SK would be dumb to attack NK. Obama is (this is my opinion) Out of his mind to agree with SK, as NK would target us next. IOf thiers war, get the bomb shelters ready.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

Derek Ortt

#20 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue May 25, 2010 9:09 am

NK is now threatening war
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests