Do you believe?

Lindaloo · #1 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 4:44 pm

I do not know what to think about this image!! Any thoughts?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3760119/

chadtm80 · #2 Postby **chadtm80** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 5:27 pm

Do you believe?

Na

Lindaloo · #3 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:31 pm

Looks real to me.

therock1811 · #4 Postby **therock1811** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 6:35 pm

Whoa...that's scary...

StormCrazyIowan · #5 Postby **StormCrazyIowan** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 8:02 pm

weatherluvr · #6 Postby **weatherluvr** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 8:26 pm

I second Chad's na. Bad angle and poor lighting. Shadows can play tricks on you.

BEER980 · #7 Postby **BEER980** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 9:45 pm

I would say it is a person or ghost. I don't think it's just shadows.

mf_dolphin · #8 Postby **mf_dolphin** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:17 pm

I fall into the non-believers as well :-)

stormy · #9 Postby **stormy** » Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:32 pm

welll i believe, saw this picture early today and it could be a photo picture shot, but they said it wasnt. who knows. but i do believe in ghost. my oldest brothers house was haunted, i know this for a fact. to many strange things happen.

#10 Postby **streetsoldier** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 7:51 am

Well, I just blew up the photo and got a good, hard look at it...shadows are consistent, it IS a robed figure (actually, caped with a hood), and the too-white face IS indeterminate.

Also, it DID open what is now a fire door, but was once a large, wooden door opening into the bailey (inner grounds) of the castle.

Verdict? Whatever it is, it's "real". :eek:

#11 Postby **Stephanie** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:26 am

I've always believed in ghosts and the "supernatural". If Bill analyzed the picture and found that it isn't superimposed, then I'm inclined to think that the picture is real and probably a ghost. That's pretty wild!

pawlee · #12 Postby **pawlee** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 12:23 pm

it's jacko in london!

#13 Postby **Stephanie** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 1:55 pm

pawlee wrote:it's jacko in london!

Lindaloo · #14 Postby **Lindaloo** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 3:24 pm

pawlee wrote:it's jacko in london!

You could be on to something. LOL!!

David · #15 Postby **David** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 9:01 pm

That's odd.... I don't know what to think.

Stormsfury · #16 Postby **Stormsfury** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:25 pm

I do, and it looks very real to me ... England is notorious for such hauntings and IMO, this looks very genuine ... I took liberty to do a negative (though I wish I had infrared to pick up a heat source) but in the negative image, I cannot pick up ANY evidence of the figure having legs or feet) and well as doing other various photo investigation.

Normal

Negative

southerngale · #17 Postby **southerngale** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:30 pm

But, there's no such thing as ghosts...

chadtm80 · #18 Postby **chadtm80** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:37 pm

Well, if it is true.. Then tell the oficials over there to PM me.. I just happen to know who they need to call :lol:

southerngale · #19 Postby **southerngale** » Sun Dec 21, 2003 11:31 pm

Ummm Chad....

GHOSTBUSTERS!! :lol:

#20 Postby **streetsoldier** » Mon Dec 22, 2003 1:00 am

On closer inspection, the cape/robe and (look closely) a hint of neck "ruff" is consistent with Tudor-era fashion, particularly for a lady of the Henry VIII/early Elizabethan period.

Strange stuff, this.

Do you believe?

Do you believe?

Who is online