Putting Things in Perspective.......Bush

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Putting Things in Perspective.......Bush

#1 Postby southerngale » Sat Feb 14, 2004 2:08 am

The following appeared in a newspaper as a letter to the editor. Hopefully it will put some things in perspective:


Some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One person recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.

Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember. It was started by terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.


FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.


Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.


John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, more than 58,000 lives were lost, averaging more than 5,800 per year.


Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.


In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled Al-Qaeda. He put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000+ of his own people.

We lost about 600 soldiers, an average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.

Worst president in history? Come on!
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#2 Postby streetsoldier » Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:21 am

While his "worthy opposition" clamored for decreased funding for upgrading our Armed Forces, cuts in our intelligence, no funding for cutting-edge aircraft and spares/parts, closing bases, and every matter concerning defense and security over 20+ years in the Senate...that is, WHEN he bothered to show up for votes.

Clear choice to me! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
stormchazer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2462
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Contact:

Re: Putting Things in Perspective.......Bush

#3 Postby stormchazer » Sat Feb 14, 2004 7:27 am

southerngale wrote:The following appeared in a newspaper as a letter to the editor. Hopefully it will put some things in perspective:


Some claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One person recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.

Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember. It was started by terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.


FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.


Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.


John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, more than 58,000 lives were lost, averaging more than 5,800 per year.


Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.


In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled Al-Qaeda. He put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000+ of his own people.

We lost about 600 soldiers, an average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.

Worst president in history? Come on!


Seems clear to me. Thanks for putting things in perspective. I hope to the Lord we do not give it all back in November.
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged

Opinions my own.

rainstorm

#4 Postby rainstorm » Sat Feb 14, 2004 8:05 am

i would hope you are right. the future of the country is at stake. if the majority of the country votes to give our security to the united nations, then we are done as a great power.
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#5 Postby mf_dolphin » Sat Feb 14, 2004 8:29 am

Helen why do you insist on exagerating everything? America has survived past presidential failures and will continue to do so no matter how the election turns out later this year. The UN does some good work on the humanitarian side but otherwise should be disbanned. It's usefullness in times of conflict remains dismal.However, to say that any US president would turn over our nations security to the UN is just garbage.
0 likes   

rainstorm

#6 Postby rainstorm » Sat Feb 14, 2004 8:50 am

kerry says it. what are you talking about?? yesterday he made a speech saying weeks after he wins(and he will) he will go to the un and "return" to the family of nations. in other words, surrender.
1-have you forgotten he has voted to kill every major weapons program
2-he has voted and professed a hatred for the intelligence agencies.

“I’m an internationalist,” Kerry told The Crimson in 1970. “I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.”

Kerry said he wanted “to almost eliminate CIA activity. The CIA is fighting its own war in Laos and nobody seems to care.”

that was said in 1970. has his voting record indicated he has changed at all? NO!
1-he said yesterday he is going back to the un
2-he has already said he wants to go back to the clinton "legal" approach. and clinton sure decimated the cia.
3-the night kerry is elected, the arab world will be dancing in the streets, and terrorists everywhere will have won a great victory.

all i am doing is going by what kerry is and has said and his voting record. what else can you go by?


and one other point. the far left of the dem party, and kerry is as far left as you get, thinks the united states is the great evil in the world. i wish anyone can find quotes of kerry saying he will prosecute the war on terrorism till victory is assured
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#7 Postby mf_dolphin » Sat Feb 14, 2004 9:05 am

What I'm saying is that this country is far stronger than you give it credit for being. President Carter was an absolute disaster but we survived. He left our men and women as hostages for 444 days after our sovereign land (the embassy) was overun. That was one of the lowest moments in US history IMO. I know because I lived it. At Ft Bragg we were recalled 3 times to go get the hostages only to be recalled by Carter because he didn't have the _____ to go do what was needed. As far as Kerry's stances while I agree they are dangerous and he needs to be stopped, we still have a Republican controlled congress.
0 likes   

timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

#8 Postby timNms » Sat Feb 14, 2004 9:24 am

mf, I agree with your assessment. While the president has power, our system is set up so that one individual can't make all the decisions. I think there are enough intelligent people in congress to stop any foolishness that Kerry, if elected, (Heaven forbid!) would try to do.
0 likes   

chadtm80

#9 Postby chadtm80 » Sat Feb 14, 2004 9:27 am

Helen why do you insist on exagerating everything?

Cause thats what trolls do ;-)
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests