Man arrested during RNC starts legal action against New York

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

Man arrested during RNC starts legal action against New York

#1 Postby TexasStooge » Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:15 am

By SAMUEL MAULL - Associated Press Writer

A man who says he was just trying to buy theater tickets when he was arrested along with hundreds of anti-Republican National Convention protesters two weeks ago took the first step Monday toward filing a $100,000 false-arrest lawsuit against the city.

Mark Perro, 21, whose parents live on Long Island, filed a notice of claim alleging that on Aug. 31, while the convention was at Madison Square Garden, he was falsely arrested, was physically and verbally abused and was denied his right to a lawyer for nearly 48 hours.

Perro's notice of claim, believed to be the first stemming from the more than 1,800 arrests during the four-day convention, was filed at the comptroller's office and the law department, a required first step before someone can sue the city or its agencies. The lawsuit can then be filed after 90 days.

Law department spokeswoman Kate O'Brien Ahlers said her office had received Perro's notice of claim and was studying it.

Perro, a public relations executive, said he left his office at 17th Street and Union Square West shortly after 7 p.m. and was walking to the Irving Plaza Theater when encountered a protest march and a police officer who stopped him.

When the officer told Perro he could not pass 16th Street and Irving Place, Perro replied that he was not involved in the protest march, his legal papers say. The officer told Perro to stand aside and he would be allowed to leave soon, the papers say.

Perro's lawyer, Robert Gottlieb, said his client told the officer, "I'm not a demonstrator; I'm just trying to get to my house."

A short time later, the papers say, Perro and several hundred other people were "ensnared and confined by (New York Police Department) officers in a mesh, net-like device." The papers say Perro soon was handcuffed and taken to a holding area at Pier 57.

At Pier 57, Perro's papers say, he was imprisoned with 500 other people in a makeshift 50-by-30-foot enclosure made of fencing and barbed wire where there was no running water or other amenities except for a portable toilet.

"The floor was dirty and stained with grease and oil, and there were hazardous-materials warning signs all around," Perro's papers say.

Perro says he was held there five or six hours before being moved (still handcuffed) to a smaller similar area.

His papers say that in his first 10 hours of imprisonment "the only food he was provided was an apple and cereal" and that at no time during his detention was he allowed to bathe or clean himself.

Perro says police took him from Pier 57 to the Manhattan Criminal Court building downtown around 3 p.m. on Sept. 1 and he was processed while handcuffed to four other people. About 7 p.m., he says, he called his father - the first call he was allowed.

Gottlieb said Perro's parents, who live on Long Island, "were beside themselves."

Perro was in a holding cell in the courthouse basement with 20 to 30 other people for another 24 hours.

Gottlieb said police gave Perro a desk appearance ticket with an Oct. 8 court date and released him around 6 p.m. on Sept. 2. The ticket was for parading without a permit and disorderly conduct, violations less serious than a misdemeanor.

Perro's claim says he is asking $100,000 for violation of his civil rights, false arrest and economic loss because he was unable to work while detained.

Copyright © 2004, The Associated Press
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#2 Postby stormie_skies » Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:34 am

Good for him! There are several other similar lawsuits pending also ...
0 likes   

User avatar
greeng13
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 838
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 4:23 pm
Location: charleston, sc

#3 Postby greeng13 » Thu Sep 30, 2004 4:57 pm

go get 'em perro!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#4 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:03 pm

Okay wait a sec. He was told by a police officer to wait a few minutes then he would be allowed through? Um okay, he proceeded and was arrested. He will lose. Sorry.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormie_skies
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3318
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 9:25 pm
Location: League City, TX

#5 Postby stormie_skies » Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:09 pm

Linda, the main cause of action in the lawsuit is the denial of legal rights & due process, I believe. Many people caught in these mass arrests were held in unhospitable (to say the least) and unsanitary conditions for extended periods of time, and were not allowed to contact legal council or their families for two days or more. For those issues, it wont matter if he was rightfully arrested or not.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#6 Postby Lindaloo » Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:51 pm

He will lose.
0 likes   

User avatar
yoda
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7874
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Springfield VA (20 mins south of DC)
Contact:

#7 Postby yoda » Thu Sep 30, 2004 7:53 pm

Lindaloo wrote:He will lose.


Not true. He will win his case... just watch.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests