Russian Volcano Erupts
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Russian Volcano Erupts
Russian volcano erupts in Kamchatka
Petropavlosk, Russia, Dec. 28 (UPI) -- Russian seismologists said the Shiveluch volcano in the eastern Kamchatka peninsula began erupting Tuesday, sending hot ash up to 6,500 feet.
Go to URL for entire article
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking ... -2844r.htm
*
Petropavlosk, Russia, Dec. 28 (UPI) -- Russian seismologists said the Shiveluch volcano in the eastern Kamchatka peninsula began erupting Tuesday, sending hot ash up to 6,500 feet.
Go to URL for entire article
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking ... -2844r.htm
*
0 likes
In 1952 there was a large earthquake
off the coast of Russia's Kamchatka
Peninsula that caused a large tsunami
that damaged parts of Hawaii.
http://www.drgeorgepc.com/Tsunami1952.html
*
off the coast of Russia's Kamchatka
Peninsula that caused a large tsunami
that damaged parts of Hawaii.
http://www.drgeorgepc.com/Tsunami1952.html
*
0 likes
Just read a local article that in Ohio, seismic (sp?) activity was detected here, from the latest quake and tsunami. I'll try to find it, if we had activity HERE, I would think officials are watching for other quakes, volcanoes to blow all over the place.
*edit, here it is:
http://www.cincynow.com/news/2004/local ... quake.html
Mary
*edit, here it is:
http://www.cincynow.com/news/2004/local ... quake.html
Mary
0 likes
Miss Mary wrote:Just read a local article that in Ohio, seismic (sp?) activity was detected here, from the latest quake and tsunami. I'll try to find it, if we had activity HERE, I would think officials are watching for other quakes, volcanoes to blow all over the place.
*edit, here it is:
http://www.cincynow.com/news/2004/local ... quake.html
Mary
WOULD THE QUAKE IN SUMATRA CREATE A CHAINED EVENT. I KNOW THE EASTERN PART OF KAMCHATKA WAS VERY ACTIVE, BUT I DID NOT KNOW THAT IT'S ERUPTING, UNTIL I READ THIS POST. I WOULD ASSUME SINCE IT RANG EARTH'S BELL THAT IT WOULD CAUSE OTHER STUFF TO HAPPEN. HMM
0 likes
wthrmilagro wrote:Miss Mary wrote:Just read a local article that in Ohio, seismic (sp?) activity was detected here, from the latest quake and tsunami. I'll try to find it, if we had activity HERE, I would think officials are watching for other quakes, volcanoes to blow all over the place.
*edit, here it is:
http://www.cincynow.com/news/2004/local ... quake.html
Mary
WOULD THE QUAKE IN SUMATRA CREATE A CHAINED EVENT. I KNOW THE EASTERN PART OF KAMCHATKA WAS VERY ACTIVE, BUT I DID NOT KNOW THAT IT'S ERUPTING, UNTIL I READ THIS POST. I WOULD ASSUME SINCE IT RANG EARTH'S BELL THAT IT WOULD CAUSE OTHER STUFF TO HAPPEN. HMM
I have no idea but after reading about this volcanic eruption, I thought the article about seismic activity detected in Ohio, was worth mention. Hopefully someone with a degree in geology or related field, will respond. Or someone with experience in this area will also.
Mary
0 likes
- azsnowman
- Category 5
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
- Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)
Couldn't find the report of the quake that registered here in Az, HOWEVER....here's a list of ALL the quakes here in the west SINCE that fatal day!
http://www.seis.utah.edu/req2webdir/rec ... akes0.html
Dennis
http://www.seis.utah.edu/req2webdir/rec ... akes0.html
Dennis

0 likes
- CaptinCrunch
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8731
- Age: 57
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:33 pm
- Location: Kennedale, TX (Tarrant Co.)
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38120
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
azsnowman wrote:Couldn't find the report of the quake that registered here in Az, HOWEVER....here's a list of ALL the quakes here in the west SINCE that fatal day!
http://www.seis.utah.edu/req2webdir/rec ... akes0.html
Dennis
Looks pretty normal to me... they are so weak that someone at the surface wouldn't feel it.
0 likes
#neversummer
I was in yellowstone in October... It is such an amazing place. It really does feel like the earth is alive under your feet, like there is so much energy just wating to get "loose". *Ok maybe I inhaled to much of the sulphuric gases while I was there*
I dont know much about geology or quakes, but to me logically an earthquake that can cause such an impact on areas so far away and effect the surface of the earth... what on earth did it do to the places and fault lines that we cant see!!
I do think this is going to have far reaching effects even into the future.

I dont know much about geology or quakes, but to me logically an earthquake that can cause such an impact on areas so far away and effect the surface of the earth... what on earth did it do to the places and fault lines that we cant see!!
I do think this is going to have far reaching effects even into the future.
0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
I think what they are talking about is that the seismographs picked up the motion of the earthquake which is not unusual. Any waves from it here would have been too low amplitude to feel. Hawaii gets hit by tsunamis all of the time sitting as it does in the middle of the Pacific Ocean where they happen on a regular basis. For those who are interested in such numbers, consider the following; Kamchatka, 1952 9.0, Andreanof Islands AK, 1957 9.1, Chile, 1960 9.5, Prince William Sound AK, 1964 9.2. Those are the ONLY 9.0+ earhtquakes to occur since 1900 prior to the recent event. Note the clustering-now could this current event mean that we could get a cluster considering that it was preceeded by an 8.1 south of Australia? Possibly but it's difficult to tell. What IS known that despite the high level of seismicity between 1952 and 1964 we still didn't see much out of the ordinary as far as vulcanism is concerned-only the Agung eruption on Bali being a really major event. The two largest volcanic events of the past Century were Katami in 1912 and Pinatubo in 1991-neither associated with high levels of seismicity. Kamchatka is a very volcanically active region of the Planet so having an eruption there is not unusual at any time and is just coincidence.
Steve

Steve

0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38120
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Amanzi wrote:I was in yellowstone in October... It is such an amazing place. It really does feel like the earth is alive under your feet, like there is so much energy just wating to get "loose". *Ok maybe I inhaled to much of the sulphuric gases while I was there*![]()
I dont know much about geology or quakes, but to me logically an earthquake that can cause such an impact on areas so far away and effect the surface of the earth... what on earth did it do to the places and fault lines that we cant see!!
I do think this is going to have far reaching effects even into the future.
I want to go to Yellowstone(as well as Yosemite out in CA). It's one of my goals. I've heard they are awesome(I'm into earthquakes as well).
0 likes
#neversummer
Aslkahuna wrote:I think what they are talking about is that the seismographs picked up the motion of the earthquake which is not unusual. Any waves from it here would have been too low amplitude to feel. Hawaii gets hit by tsunamis all of the time sitting as it does in the middle of the Pacific Ocean where they happen on a regular basis. For those who are interested in such numbers, consider the following; Kamchatka, 1952 9.0, Andreanof Islands AK, 1957 9.1, Chile, 1960 9.5, Prince William Sound AK, 1964 9.2. Those are the ONLY 9.0+ earhtquakes to occur since 1900 prior to the recent event. Note the clustering-now could this current event mean that we could get a cluster considering that it was preceeded by an 8.1 south of Australia? Possibly but it's difficult to tell. What IS known that despite the high level of seismicity between 1952 and 1964 we still didn't see much out of the ordinary as far as vulcanism is concerned-only the Agung eruption on Bali being a really major event. The two largest volcanic events of the past Century were Katami in 1912 and Pinatubo in 1991-neither associated with high levels of seismicity. Kamchatka is a very volcanically active region of the Planet so having an eruption there is not unusual at any time and is just coincidence.
Steve
Thanks! Your posts are always most informative

0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests