http://slate.msn.com/id/2123557/
At the bottom of the article is a link to the Fray, where anyone with an MSN/Hotmail account can discuss the bill (without clogging up the board here and giving the mods a headache

Moderator: S2k Moderators
There are two possible responses to AccuWeather's suggestion that competition with NWS would wipe it out.
One possibile response is that it isn't true—that AccuWeather might be mildly inconvenienced by the government's dissemination of weather information, but that consumers will always want AccuWeather's prettier weather maps. If it turned out that the federal government was withholding vital weather information from AccuWeather to such an extent that the company couldn't make its prettier maps, the true free-market solution would be for AccuWeather to start collecting its own damn data—not for AccuWeather to go crying to Santorum for legislative relief.
The other possible response to AccuWeather's whining is that it is true—that the NWS will squash AccuWeather like a bug by providing taxpayers with the weather information that they, ahem, already paid for, instead of leaving it to AccuWeather to charge taxpayers a second time for access to that information. That obviously would be a problem for AccuWeather. But why should the rest of us care?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests