
BREAKING NEWS: Andrea Yates Not Guilty in Retrial
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38105
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
BREAKING NEWS: Andrea Yates Not Guilty in Retrial

Last edited by Brent on Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
#neversummer
- Skywatch_NC
- Category 5
- Posts: 10949
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5205
- Age: 52
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
- Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W
Here is a link to the story.
http://www.wftv.com/news/5286592/detail.html
Very upsetting, and don't see how the outcome could be much different. I surley hope it's not going to be different.
http://www.wftv.com/news/5286592/detail.html
Very upsetting, and don't see how the outcome could be much different. I surley hope it's not going to be different.

0 likes
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
What a waste of our tax dollars! She did it and she admitted it. I can't believe they have to try this case again!
Just hearing about it again is very disturbing and now we'll be hearing about it a lot more. I've cried many tears for those innocent children.
Now why didn't she get the death penalty?

Just hearing about it again is very disturbing and now we'll be hearing about it a lot more. I've cried many tears for those innocent children.

0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29113
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
southerngale wrote:What a waste of our tax dollars! She did it and she admitted it. I can't believe they have to try this case again!![]()
Just hearing about it again is very disturbing and now we'll be hearing about it a lot more. I've cried many tears for those innocent children.Now why didn't she get the death penalty?
She didn't get the death penalty because she was insane. I agree with all the sentiments above. THIS IS MADDENING!!!!
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
- streetsoldier
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 9705
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Under the rainbow
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5205
- Age: 52
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
- Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W
streetsoldier wrote:GalvestonDuck wrote:All because some dork of a shrink carried on about the influence of a non-existent episode of "Law & Order."
Heck, he might as well have said she ate too many Twinkies.
More like "Lawn Order"...who knows what type of grass he was tokin' before court.
Not to make light of the situation but,

0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38105
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
vbhoutex wrote:southerngale wrote:What a waste of our tax dollars! She did it and she admitted it. I can't believe they have to try this case again!![]()
Just hearing about it again is very disturbing and now we'll be hearing about it a lot more. I've cried many tears for those innocent children.Now why didn't she get the death penalty?
She didn't get the death penalty because she was insane. I agree with all the sentiments above. THIS IS MADDENING!!!!
It's absolutely ridiclous.

0 likes
#neversummer
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38105
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
O Town wrote:streetsoldier wrote:GalvestonDuck wrote:All because some dork of a shrink carried on about the influence of a non-existent episode of "Law & Order."
Heck, he might as well have said she ate too many Twinkies.
More like "Lawn Order"...who knows what type of grass he was tokin' before court.
Not to make light of the situation but,
That was funny.


0 likes
#neversummer
- TexasStooge
- Category 5
- Posts: 38127
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
- Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
- Contact:
Yates pleads innocent by reason of insanity
HOUSTON, Texas (The Dallas Morning News/AP) - Andrea Yates pleaded innocent by reason of insanity in the drowning deaths of her children Monday during her first court appearance since her 2002 capital murder convictions were overturned.
State District Judge Belinda Hill accepted the plea and set Yates case for trial on March 20.
Yates, 41, will remain in the custody of the Harris County Sheriff's Department until she is retried in the deaths of three of her five children. Her attorney, George Parnham, had asked that Yates be sent to Rusk State Hospital until the new trial.
Jurors rejected Yates' insanity defense during her original trial, finding her guilty for the 2001 deaths of three of the children drowned in the family bathtub: 7-year-old Noah, 5-year-old John and the youngest, 6-month-old Mary. Evidence was presented about the drowning of the other two children -- Paul, 3, and Luke, 2 -- but Yates was not charged in their deaths.
Yates was sentenced to life in prison.
The First Court of Appeals in Houston overturned Yates convictions last January because the state's expert witness, forensic psychiatrist Park Dietz, testified that television's "Law and Order" series aired an episode about a woman with postpartum depression who drowned her children shortly before Yates killed her five children. Such an episode never existed.
HOUSTON, Texas (The Dallas Morning News/AP) - Andrea Yates pleaded innocent by reason of insanity in the drowning deaths of her children Monday during her first court appearance since her 2002 capital murder convictions were overturned.
State District Judge Belinda Hill accepted the plea and set Yates case for trial on March 20.
Yates, 41, will remain in the custody of the Harris County Sheriff's Department until she is retried in the deaths of three of her five children. Her attorney, George Parnham, had asked that Yates be sent to Rusk State Hospital until the new trial.
Jurors rejected Yates' insanity defense during her original trial, finding her guilty for the 2001 deaths of three of the children drowned in the family bathtub: 7-year-old Noah, 5-year-old John and the youngest, 6-month-old Mary. Evidence was presented about the drowning of the other two children -- Paul, 3, and Luke, 2 -- but Yates was not charged in their deaths.
Yates was sentenced to life in prison.
The First Court of Appeals in Houston overturned Yates convictions last January because the state's expert witness, forensic psychiatrist Park Dietz, testified that television's "Law and Order" series aired an episode about a woman with postpartum depression who drowned her children shortly before Yates killed her five children. Such an episode never existed.
0 likes
- george_r_1961
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3171
- Age: 64
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
- Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania
- Skywatch_NC
- Category 5
- Posts: 10949
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:31 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC
- Contact:
george_r_1961 wrote:Skywatch_NC wrote:Crappin' American judicial system!
The same system is designed to keep innocents from being wrongly convicted and is not without flaws, the Yates case being a good example of one of the flaws. Our system isnt perfect nor will it ever be.
Yes, that post I made in November was out of frustration and anger.
0 likes
I think she should either be in prison for life (even if it's a prison for the mentally insane) or executed, preferably the latter.
I do, however, have a problem with the prosecutors choosing to try her on only 3 of the murders, instead of all 5. I know why they're doing this, (so they'll have another shot at her if she somehow manages to avoid prison (or execution) on the other 3) but since all 5 crimes are related she should be tried on all 5 at once. Seperating the 5 murders so that prosecutors can try her again if they don't get the sentence they want on the first 3 violates the spirit of double jeopardy, in my opinion.
I do, however, have a problem with the prosecutors choosing to try her on only 3 of the murders, instead of all 5. I know why they're doing this, (so they'll have another shot at her if she somehow manages to avoid prison (or execution) on the other 3) but since all 5 crimes are related she should be tried on all 5 at once. Seperating the 5 murders so that prosecutors can try her again if they don't get the sentence they want on the first 3 violates the spirit of double jeopardy, in my opinion.
0 likes
- george_r_1961
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3171
- Age: 64
- Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
- Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania
Aslkahuna wrote:Let's get this straight-the US does NOT have a Justice System, it has a LEGAL system.
Steve
Steve im as angry as you are but remember protecting the innocent has the same priority as prosecuting the guilty. Unfortunately in this case the "legal system" is being abused as there is no way she is "innocent" of the crimes she was rightly convicted of...except perhaps due to insanity. Yes thats the law. And if the jury agrees she insane she gets to spend the rest of her life in a comfy hospital instead of a prison cell. Unless of course some doctor declares her "cured".
0 likes
- Tstormwatcher
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3086
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: New Bern, NC
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests