Animated avatars

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
azsnowman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8591
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:56 pm
Location: Pinetop Arizona. Elevation 7102' (54 miles west of NM border)

Animated avatars

#1 Postby azsnowman » Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:31 pm

Is it just me or does the animated avatars some members have *kinda* slow the thread down? I just got high speed net about a month ago and God I LOVE it......but when I click on some threads where the poster has animated avatars, trying to scroll to the bottom on the page is just, well, SLOOOOOOOW

Dennis 8-)
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#2 Postby GalvestonDuck » Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:34 pm

I'm guilty of having one, but it didn't slow down my old computer and hasn't slowed my new Dell up either. Of course, I still have the same DSL.

If the avs are a problem, I'll gladly change mine. But you're still gonna be stuck with Gabby. :)
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

#3 Postby O Town » Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:57 pm

Sometimes, but not often.
0 likes   

weatherlover427

#4 Postby weatherlover427 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 7:21 pm

Nope, not at all here on my 8mb cable connection (unless it is a GIGANTIC file :eek: )
0 likes   

Rainband

#5 Postby Rainband » Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:01 pm

I am on my new DELL lappy and it doesn't have any probs and it's wireless broadband
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#6 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:16 pm

Really my computer uploads fine. Do you have DSL azsowman, it's awesome.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#7 Postby CajunMama » Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:24 pm

There are some that tend to make my computer lag.
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#8 Postby coriolis » Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:35 am

I don't think that it's the avatars that make my computer slow. My computer makes itself slow. (500 mhz)
0 likes   
This space for rent.

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#9 Postby P.K. » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:30 am

It is not just that, large image files (Say a few hundred kB, or bigger than the screen, say wider than 800 pixels) make threads hard to read and use extra bandwidth I'd rather not use. Don't know how it works in the USA but I have a limited amount of downloading I can use every month and so would rather people just posted links in these cases.
Last edited by P.K. on Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#10 Postby AussieMark » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:33 am

I have unlimted download limits :)
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#11 Postby P.K. » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:40 am

Most broadband providers limit downloads here sadly. :(
0 likes   

User avatar
CentralFlGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL

#12 Postby CentralFlGal » Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:38 pm

P.K. wrote:Most broadband providers limit downloads here sadly. :(


This is the first I've heard of this. Is that the case on the continent too? You'd have to stay away from graphics-intense websites, and, unfortunately, that appears to be a trend in web design these days.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#13 Postby P.K. » Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:48 am

I'd assume so. Initially there were no limits as far as I'm aware but over the last couple of years it is something most of them have introduced here.
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

#14 Postby O Town » Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:37 am

I have never heard of such either. Lordy I hope the U.S. doesn't get any bright ideas like that. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

#15 Postby bvigal » Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:19 am

Lesson in economics - just because you don't pay for it yourself, doesn't mean there is no incremental cost. Bandwidth costs money, and somebody pays for it, somehow. Yes, it gets cheaper all the time, as new technology allows more and faster to be pushed down the pipe, but then it's used more all the time as users take advantage of the increased possibilities. Just like computers, phones, etc. For downloading, most users have unlimited usage at their bandwidth. Some have to choose limited usage plans, like P.K. Mine is $100/month ADSL, supposedly unlimited and a certain speed, but the more users they put on, the slower it gets.

Then there is the issue of bandwidth bottleneck from hosting server to backbone, which can happen when site is busy. You'll see when storm season begins... :wink:

This is straying off course a bit (as she drags the soapbox from under the stair), but everyone using email and the web should know this.

The truth is, our bandwidth costs, however small they might be, would probably be 1/2 what they are, if SPAM'ers could be hunted down and put out of business for good. With many thousand sending out several million mails/day, the estimates of internet bandwidth used for "junk" are very high. (Not to mention admin costs for security layers, etc. eventually paid by the user.)

As soon as my email host software (IceWarp) gets upgraded to refuse IP Blocks via wildcards (i.e. 220.*.*.*), I will stop everything in Asia, and much of Europe, from even being accepted by my mail server. (They keep saying they can do it in the last couple of releases, but it doesn't work.) I don't know anyone in these place, so I don't need to get email from there.

I research and report a lot of spam, been doing it since mid-90's. I don't care who mailed it to me (which could be forged or relayed via an innocent party with poor security), I just go after what they are trying to sell - the website in question. I've successfully shut down many domains being advertised via SPAM. But, the mail hosting providers and domain allocators in Asia, and some other places, are so poorly regulated, that reporting to them just gets your address on another bunch of mailing list CD's for sale.

And, they've only scratched the surface. There is so much money to be made, that people want to 'take it and run', not waste time and money to set up an infrastructure of regulations and consequences and agreements with multiple jurisdictions, etc. So, they don't care if their customers are eating up the Western Hemisphere's bandwidth, etc.

A large % of "send this to everyone you know"-type emails are designed to support this industry, by collecting more email addresses. Please discourage this type of traffic, by deleting it instead of participating, and by asking your friends to do the same.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests