English Language Hits 1 Billion Words

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

English Language Hits 1 Billion Words

#1 Postby TexasStooge » Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:13 pm

By SUEVON LEE, Associated Press Writer

LONDON, England (AP) - A massive language research database responsible for bringing words such as "podcast" and "celebutante" to the pages of the Oxford dictionaries has officially hit a total of 1 billion words, researchers said Wednesday.

Drawing on sources such as weblogs, chatrooms, newspapers, magazines and fiction, the Oxford English Corpus spots emerging trends in language usage to help guide lexicographers when composing the most recent editions of dictionaries.

The press publishes the Oxford English Dictionary, considered the most comprehensive dictionary of the language, which in its most recent August 2005 edition added words such as "supersize," "wiki" and "retail politics" to its pages.

Oxford University Press lexicographer Catherine Soanes said the database is not a collection of 1 billion different words, but of sentences and other examples of the usage and spelling.

"The corpus is purely 21st century English," said Judy Pearsall, publishing manager of English dictionaries. "You're looking at current English and seeing what's happening right now. That's language at the cutting edge."

As hybrid words such as "geek-chic," "inner-child" or "gabfest" increase in usage, Pearsall said part of the research project's goal is to identify words that have lasting power.

"English gets really creative, really fun. What we're putting in dictionaries is words that will stick around," she said.

Launched in January 2000, the Oxford English Corpus is part of the world's largest-funded language research project, costing $90,000-$107,000 per year.

It has helped identify how the spellings of common phrases have changed, such as "fazed by" to "phased by" or "free rein" to "free reign."

"Buck naked" increasingly has evolved to "butt naked."

The corpus collects evidence from all the places where English is spoken, whether from North America, Britain, the Caribbean, Australia or India, to reflect the most current and common usage of the English language.
___

On the Net: Oxford Corpus
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#2 Postby coriolis » Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:42 am

It has helped identify how the spellings of common phrases have changed, such as "fazed by" to "phased by" or "free rein" to "free reign."

"Buck naked" increasingly has evolved to "butt naked."


I thought that these were just corrupted spellings and pronounciations by individuals that didn't know any better. I guess not.
0 likes   
This space for rent.

kevin

#3 Postby kevin » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:41 am

Usage is the only thing that matters. Language changes over time, and I'm sure its a good thing. English is a very large language right now, spreading out across the entire world. There are hundreds of dialects. Because rules will be broken, eventually english will fragment into regional languages. On account of the written nature of our language this will take much longer.

But language purists should know the only languages which are static are dead languages, but even there spelling is something of whatever you wish at least with the one I know best, latin.
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#4 Postby coriolis » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:57 am

Well thats jest grate!
0 likes   
This space for rent.

User avatar
James
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1531
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Contact:

#5 Postby James » Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:05 pm

It's interesting to consider that we probably don't use a great proportion of those words at all in our speech, we are perfectly able to get by on a relatively limited number of words that can express such a huge amount of things. Weird to think of how many millions there must be that you've never even heard of.
0 likes   

kevin

#6 Postby kevin » Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:18 pm

English dominates science, so there are hundreds of thousands of scientific technical jargon that gets included. Also there aren't 1 billion words, despite what the title says. There are 1 billion words among phrases and sentences (according to the article). They're basically including idiomatic phrases.

Well thats jest grate!


Indeed! ;)

Now, I wasn't advocating that standards shouldn't be dropped for the written language, because mutual intelligibility is useful in business, government, and public exchange, but spelling will change because people will think of words in new ways and they will pronounce them differently. If you don't change your spelling, you end up with something godawful and approaching French. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
CentralFlGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 573
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Cocoa Beach, FL

#7 Postby CentralFlGal » Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:45 pm

I think back to the days when teachers used to tell students "'Ain't' ain't in the dictionary."
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#8 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:38 pm

my 60 year old teacher still tells me that but it is in the dictionary
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#9 Postby coriolis » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:59 pm

kevin wrote:mutual intelligibility


Ya, I understand what you're saying, but that would make for good governmental doubletalk.

"The secretary cited a breakdown in mutual intelligibility between the departments as the cause for the ineffective response to the situation."

"We all know that mutual intelligibility is crucial to the cooperative mission that our organizations share."
0 likes   
This space for rent.

kevin

#10 Postby kevin » Tue May 02, 2006 11:09 am

Yes, I should work for the government. I could help them become even more obtuse. :D
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests