U.S. to Repeal Long-Distance Phone Tax

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

U.S. to Repeal Long-Distance Phone Tax

#1 Postby alicia-w » Thu May 25, 2006 6:37 pm

Courtesy of the New York Times



Published: May 25, 2006

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury Department Thursday conceded a legal dispute over the federal excise tax on long-distance telephone service and said the Internal Revenue Service will refund tax paid on the service over the past three years.

In a statement, U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow also urged Congress to repeal the excise tax on local telephone service.

The Justice Department will no longer pursue litigation on the long-distance issue, the statement said.

The Treasury Department said taxpayers can claim a refund on their 2006 returns for the long-distance tax, which was established in 1898 as a luxury tax on wealthy Americans who owned telephones.

Snow, at a press conference on Capitol Hill with lawmakers, said the tax was "antiquated" and well-rid of.

"It's not often you get to kill a tax, particularly one that goes back so far in history," Snow said, adding that Treasury was pleased to concede this tax was no longer useful.

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, the decision will lead to billion of dollars in refunds to U.S. consumers and businesses who have paid it, with refunds and lost revenue over the next five years adding up to about $60 billion.

Snow estimated the cost of refunding taxpayers for three years of past taxes would total about $13 billion, and said that there would be no problem in finding that amount.

"The revenue stream is strong and can easily absorb this," Snow said.

In response to questions, Snow said he could not specify how much of the refund might be made to businesses and how much to individuals. He also said Treasury could not yet estimate the size of refund an average individual could expect to get.


0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#2 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri May 26, 2006 3:45 pm

let me get this straight?

I do not want this to sound political at all, forgive me if it does, more budjetary (which I am guilty myself of breaking, check out my credit cards... lol)

we are in a deficit and we are decreasing the revenue intake?

not that I should be critical when I am doing the same thing, when I may have to put my now 4 year old brother through college in 14 years... when prices are going to be just a bit higher than they currently are
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#3 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri May 26, 2006 3:49 pm

What can I say when China finally sells we are going down. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Yankeegirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3417
Age: 49
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: Cy-Fair, Northwest Houston
Contact:

#4 Postby Yankeegirl » Fri May 26, 2006 4:04 pm

I dont want anymore taxes... arent there already enough???
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests