I think some people are reading something into the story that's not there.
First of all, the article is full of the word "allegedly." We don't know how accurate the quote is or if anything like that was said at all. In a court of law, such testimony wouldn't stand. It's hearsay. And then for some reason, a lot of people think "bombing" a country means totally wiping it off the face of the earth. Even if a warning was given (not a threat) to Pakistan, alerting them to possible actions being taken in their country against the Taliban, it would
not mean the US and its allies were going in and just randomly and indiscriminately bombing anywhere and everywhere. We're better than that and I think we've proven that. We are selective about our targets.
Yarrah wrote:Another thing we should remember is that the greatest threat from terrorism isn't coming from the Middle-East and other Muslim countries, but from our own Western countries. The Madrid and London bombings, for example, were all executed by radical Muslims from Spain and the UK.
By radical Muslims IN Spain and the UK, not necessarily FROM. Where do you think they got their training, their orders, and their money? It filters down from the Middle East.