Earthquake activity gone AWOL?

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

Earthquake activity gone AWOL?

#1 Postby conestogo_flood » Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:00 pm

Has anyone been noticing a recent increase in the number of earthquakes occuring day to day globally?

I started noticing it a few months ago... here is some research to back this thought...

From 1987 to Jan.07...
Earthquakes occuring per year(Depth of 0km to 100km)...
1987 - 218 (176 5.0-5.10, 37 6.0-6.10, 5 7.0-7.10)
1988 - 199 (168 5.0-5.10, 28 6.0-6.10, 3 7.0-7.10)
1989 - 174 (151 5.0-5.10, 18 6.0-6.10, 4 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
1990 - 180 (146 5.0-5.10, 31 6.0-6.10, 3 7.0-7.10)
1991 - 121 (99 5.0-5.10, 15 6.0-6.10, 7 7.0-7.10)
1992 - 150 (113 5.0-5.10, 32 6.0-6.10, 5 7.0-7.10)
1993 - 152 (120 5.0-5.10, 25 6.0-6.10, 6 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
1994 - 146 (115 5.0-5.10, 25 6.0-6.10, 5 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
1995 - 198 (151 6.0-5.10, 37 6.0-6.10, 8 7.0-7.10, 2 8.0-8.10)
1996 - 148 (109 5.0-5.10, 30 6.0-6.10, 9 7.0-7.10)
1997 - 140 (111 5.0-5.10, 26 6.0-6.10, 3 7.0-7.10)
1998 - 126 (102 5.0-5.10, 20 6.0-6.10, 3 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
1999 - 224 (186 5.0-5.10, 31 6.0-6.10, 7 7.0-7.10)
2000 - 252 (220 5.0-5.10, 26 6.0-6.10, 5 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
2001 - 251 (217 5.0-5.10, 27 6.0-6.10, 6 7.0-7.1, 1 8.0-8.10)
2002 - 196 (169 5.0-5.10, 22 6.0-6.10, 4 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
2003 - 250 (206 5.0-5.10, 35 6.0-6.10, 8 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
2004 - 299 (259 5.0-5.10, 36 6.0-6.10, 4 7.0-7.10, 1 9.0-9.10)
2005 - 332 (278 5.0-5.10, 48 6.0-6.10, 5 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
2006 - 262 (210 5.0-5.10, 48 6.0-6.10, 3 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
2007 - 112 (101 5.0-5.10, 9 6.0-6.10, 1 7.0-7.10, 1 8.0-8.10)
{Note(2007)is up until Jan.29 at 930 pm EDT.}

Notice the increase around 1999.
The average number of 6.0-6.10 quakes between 87-06 is 30(rounded). 2007 already has 33% of the 6.0-6.10 quakes measured yearly in only 1 month.

Also note, there has already been an 8.0-8.10 quake in 2006, when on average not even 1 per year is recorded... up until 1999.

The increase in 5.0-5.10 quakes is alarming. The average number of 5.0-5.10 quakes between 87-06 yearly is 165. We are already at 112 in 2007.

Increasingly active areas...
I've noticed IMO over the past year more quakes are occuring the St. Lawrence Valley region of Canada/New England. Especially this week there has been 4 earthquakes measuing 2.0-2.10 and 1 quake measuring 1.0-1.10. That isn't including microquakes.

Molucca Sea...
5.0-5.10 earthquakes occuring more than once daily it seems.

Yellowstone...
There has been a recent surge in microquakes and small earthquakes occuring in or near Yellowstone National Park.

Puerto Rico/Gulf of Mexico
There has been a large increase in earthquakes occuring here, noticeable increase to the naked eye.

New Madrid...
There has been a lot more 1.0-1.10 to 3.0-3.10 quakes occuring here over the past months.

California/Nevada/Utah...
More 1.0-1.10 to 4.0.4.10 quakes occuring here.

Mediterranean...
More earthquakes here too, some causing damage in Greece.

{NOTE... WHILE TYPING THIS POST A 5.2 PRELIM QUAKE HAS OCCURED IN THE MOLUCCA SEA...953 PM EDT}

Tonga/Fiji Regions...
More 5.0-7.10 quakes occuring here than normal over the past few months to a year.

Taiwan...
Read an article on this one - There has been a recent increase in 5.0-7.10 earthquakes here, damaging communication lines to China continuously under the ocean.

Tsunamis

Tsunami bulletins seem to be flying off the shelf right now, we went from years of no activity to tsunami warnings and actual tsunamis (generally small) occuring every few months.

Some days, it appears evident that you can draw every fault line on Earth on the earthquake maps because there are so many quakes on each it draws a line in itself.

Call this paranoia if you believe, but maybe something is coming... also it seems as if volcanic activity is on the rise globally.
0 likes   

goodgal996
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:04 pm

#2 Postby goodgal996 » Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:54 pm

Yikes those numbers so far this year are crazy. Definitely seems like something not very good is going on here. I'm in New England and I don't think I've actually felt an earthquake before (slept through a decent sized one we had like 2 or 3 years ago), but if these stats stay consistent, maybe that'll change soon.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

#3 Postby Ptarmigan » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:49 pm

Where did you get those earthquake information? Hmmmmmmm..... I wonder if seismic activities could be linked to hurricane activities?
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#4 Postby HurricaneBill » Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:22 am

0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#5 Postby conestogo_flood » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:54 am

That article does not include 2006/2007 though.
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#6 Postby conestogo_flood » Wed Jan 31, 2007 1:07 pm

In the past seven days now there have been 8 earthquakes in the St. Lawrence Valley of Ontario/Quebec measuring 2.0-2.10, and there has been one earthquake measuring 1.0-1.10. Usually little earthquakes even 1.0-1.10 don't occur weekly, or even bi-weekly. That fault line/earthquake zone out there has produced quakes as large as 7.0 near Montreal in the 1700s and 1800s.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#7 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:12 pm

I'm confused by your subject...

You say "Earthquake activity gone AWOL?," however, you talk about increased activity.

Unless I'm missing something here, or simply missing sarcasm in your topic, then please carry on, but your topic would suggest a significant decrease in activity. (AWOL = absent without leave; thus--earthquake activity gone absent (without leave)]
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#8 Postby conestogo_flood » Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:59 pm

I meant it as normal activity went AWOL.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aslkahuna
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Contact:

#9 Postby Aslkahuna » Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:38 pm

I think the word he wanted to use was amök rather than AWOL.

Steve
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests