thunderchief wrote:this storm is increadibly tight and rapidly intensifying. Its pressure will be much higher for a 5 than normal.
It was a Category 2 this morning and now a Category 4. It would not surprise me if it is a 5 by the end of the day.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
thunderchief wrote:this storm is increadibly tight and rapidly intensifying. Its pressure will be much higher for a 5 than normal.
miamicanes177 wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:the latest data had an unflagged 142KT
I've never heard of surface winds being higher than flight level winds. FL winds are only 147kts and SFRM is reporting 142kts...158kts..and 163kts...so either something is wrong or this beast is on steroids.
If this thing has 190mph winds at the surface then it must be Armageddon in the eyewall.Derek Ortt wrote:looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
miamicanes177 wrote:If this thing has 190mph winds at the surface then it must be Armageddon in the eyewall.Derek Ortt wrote:looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
CrazyC83 wrote:miamicanes177 wrote:If this thing has 190mph winds at the surface then it must be Armageddon in the eyewall.Derek Ortt wrote:looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
190 mph winds at the surface makes little sense with a pressure in the 930s. Maybe if the pressure was 894 and not 934...
Scorpion wrote:
With the way this storm is strengthening it could be in the high 920's now, so you never know.
brunota2003 wrote:Hmmm...Is it because the winds are so strong that the dropsondes are not reporting wind at the surface? Or the waves? That is, I think the second eyewall drop that showed no surface values.
brunota2003 wrote:Hmmm...Is it because the winds are so strong that the dropsondes are not reporting wind at the surface? Or the waves? That is, I think the second eyewall drop that showed no surface values.
Derek Ortt wrote:an 80% conversion of the MBL is used and 75 percent from 1500 feet
not sure where the 925mb level is with this monster though... need to check the sonde again
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests