Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5313
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#101 Postby Ptarmigan » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:27 pm

thunderchief wrote:this storm is increadibly tight and rapidly intensifying. Its pressure will be much higher for a 5 than normal.


It was a Category 2 this morning and now a Category 4. It would not surprise me if it is a 5 by the end of the day.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Re:

#102 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:28 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:the latest data had an unflagged 142KT

I've never heard of surface winds being higher than flight level winds. FL winds are only 147kts and SFRM is reporting 142kts...158kts..and 163kts...so either something is wrong or this beast is on steroids.


158 and 163 were wrong . . . ignore them like they don't exist . . .

However, the 142 was not flagged . . . which means it should be accurate. And yes, it is possible to have reduction factors >1, sometimes even nearing 1.4, though it is rare . . .
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#103 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:31 pm

looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#104 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:33 pm

I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking that those readings might not be suspect . . . the exact values may be off, but there are still valid +/-5kts IMO . . .
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#105 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:34 pm

That means this is a very powerful cat5 hurricane. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
thunderchief
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#106 Postby thunderchief » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:35 pm

Agree Ortt, especailly looking at the nearly perfect IR satellite presentation, with its cold tops. Even if those winds are a little high now, wait 2 hours.
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re:

#107 Postby miamicanes177 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:35 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
If this thing has 190mph winds at the surface then it must be Armageddon in the eyewall.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#108 Postby Scorpion » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:36 pm

Now if only the pressure will respond.. I'd like to see this get lower than 920
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#109 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:36 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
If this thing has 190mph winds at the surface then it must be Armageddon in the eyewall.


190 mph winds at the surface makes little sense with a pressure in the 930s. Maybe if the pressure was 894 and not 934...
0 likes   

User avatar
Beam
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 292
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:06 pm

#110 Postby Beam » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:36 pm

Just looking at the latest sat. image alone, it's not all that hard to imagine Felix being a 155-160 KT storm, crazy as that may sound. It just keeps getting better organized. If the data is valid, Felix could very well rival or even exceed Katrina's peak windspeed. Amazing.
Last edited by Beam on Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Scorpion

Re: Re:

#111 Postby Scorpion » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:37 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
miamicanes177 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:looking at the data more closely, if the 142 is valid, I see no reason why the 163KT is also not valid... it would fit in with a similar FL to surface reduction factor and would also make since since it was to the north of the cyclone
If this thing has 190mph winds at the surface then it must be Armageddon in the eyewall.


190 mph winds at the surface makes little sense with a pressure in the 930s. Maybe if the pressure was 894 and not 934...


With the way this storm is strengthening it could be in the high 920's now, so you never know.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#112 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:37 pm

Derek, conversion from MBL to surface would be about .75 typically, right? Or is that just 925mb conversion?
Last edited by WindRunner on Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#113 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:37 pm

HOLY CRAP this thing is at least 160 mph???!?!?!??????
CRAP that is insane!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#114 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:39 pm

Hmmm...Is it because the winds are so strong that the dropsondes are not reporting wind at the surface? Or the waves? That is, I think the second eyewall drop that showed no surface values.
0 likes   

PhillyWX
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:54 am
Location: Philly
Contact:

Re: Re:

#115 Postby PhillyWX » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:40 pm

Scorpion wrote:
With the way this storm is strengthening it could be in the high 920's now, so you never know.


A near 30 mb drop in 3 hours? OK! :lol:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#116 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:42 pm

an 80% conversion of the MBL is used and 75 percent from 1500 feet

not sure where the 925mb level is with this monster though... need to check the sonde again
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#117 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:43 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Hmmm...Is it because the winds are so strong that the dropsondes are not reporting wind at the surface? Or the waves? That is, I think the second eyewall drop that showed no surface values.


No, it's because the mandatory 925mb level is too close . . . it doesn't have time to take two readings within a split second (i.e. much less than 50 meters).
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#118 Postby LAwxrgal » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:44 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Hmmm...Is it because the winds are so strong that the dropsondes are not reporting wind at the surface? Or the waves? That is, I think the second eyewall drop that showed no surface values.


Isn't that kind of like what happened with Wilma? Her eye was so small and the winds were so strong that they really couldn't get an accurate measurement of her wind speed.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

Re:

#119 Postby WindRunner » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:44 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:an 80% conversion of the MBL is used and 75 percent from 1500 feet

not sure where the 925mb level is with this monster though... need to check the sonde again


The winds themselves are crazy regardless . . . 176kts in NE eyewall and 151kts in SW eyewall . . . that's why I am curious . . .
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Hurricane Félix: RECON Discussion

#120 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:45 pm

Mmm...pressure at 5 pm was 956...since 5 pm, if the pressure right now is 934, that would be 22 millibar drop. Coming out to, using a 3 hour (5 pm to 8 pm) division, 7.33333 millibar drop per hour!!! That is absolutely insane!
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests