Invest 99L:Off E Coast-Discussions

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Coredesat

#1321 Postby Coredesat » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:11 pm

It doesn't appear to be doing so well to me. I agree with Derek, I wouldn't put my money on the models at this point, because most of them were consistently progging development by now. All we have here is a very weak LLCC embedded in dry air behind a newly-developed frontal boundary. Even if the shear decreases, there's so much dry air that I wouldn't really count on development:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#1322 Postby Andrew92 » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:14 pm

Sorry to be such a cynic, but just for Inaccuweather's graphic there, even though they admit it's "to be," I hope this does NOT even become a depression. :grrr:

-Andrew92
0 likes   

User avatar
sunnyday
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1590
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:16 pm

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO Shortly

#1323 Postby sunnyday » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:16 pm

It never looked like it had any potential to me. I wondered what everyone was so excited about. 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

Re: Invest 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1324 Postby CronkPSU » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:17 pm

dwg71 wrote:
miamicanes177 wrote:Image


i've seen it all now, how about Gabrielle to be??? Any credibility they once had is slowly fading. I refer to them as "Accucrap", because its all pretty much dressed up BS.



seriously, my jaw just dropped seeing that...there is no way that will verify, people will be mocking that forecast forever! :hehe:
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#1325 Postby Cyclone1 » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:22 pm

I think it'll form, definitely. But not until it gets much closer to land. I predicted it be like Gaston, but not as strong and further north.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#1326 Postby txwatcher91 » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:23 pm

Does anybody remember the wave/former TD that spawned Katrina? How about Andrew before it became a monster? This thing still has a chance as long as there is an LLC there. Our local met said that he did not expect it to begin developing until Friday, but that once it did, it would organize fairly quickly. I am not saying it will or will not develop, but I would not write 99L off just yet. Wait until tomorrow morning.

Edit- It is beginning to fire some storms to the N and the NW of the center. I would watch it tonight and see what it does.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145336
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO Shortly

#1327 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:30 pm

ABNT20 KNHC 062115
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
530 PM EDT THU SEP 6 2007

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

SHOWER ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE NON-TROPICAL AREA OF LOW
PRESSURE ABOUT 350 MILES SOUTHWEST OF BERMUDA REMAINS DISORGANIZED.
WHILE UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE UNFAVORABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT...THEY
COULD BECOME MORE FAVORABLE OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS...AND
THERE IS STILL SOME POTENTIAL FOR THIS SYSTEM TO BECOME A TROPICAL
CYCLONE. THE LOW IS DRIFTING ERRATICALLY AT THIS TIME...BUT IS
EXPECTED TO MOVE GENERALLY TOWARD THE NORTHWEST OVER THE NEXT DAY
OR SO.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$

FORECASTER BEVEN

WWWW
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#1328 Postby txwatcher91 » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:38 pm

Is it possible that 99L has also upwelled cooler waters from where it has been sitting near the same area for a few days? This pic seems to indicate that.
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO at page 67

#1329 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:41 pm

WOW!

Image

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO at page 67

#1330 Postby Nimbus » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:43 pm

Knowing this storm is going to develop is a lot easier than knowing where the storm will track. The longer the NHC waits to declare this a TD/TS the better handle they will have on potential tracks.

I will donate $5 to S2K if this does not develop into a TS, anyone want to make the reverse bet?
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO at page 67

#1331 Postby Ixolib » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:50 pm

Is there a thread/discussion on this somewhere??

Image
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

#1332 Postby pojo » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:52 pm

CARCAH has us tasked for tomorrow...we will see how things go in the morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
windstorm99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1578
Age: 47
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida
Contact:

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO at page 67

#1333 Postby windstorm99 » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:52 pm

Ixolib wrote:Is there a thread/discussion on this somewhere??

Image


http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=97757
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO at page 67

#1334 Postby Ixolib » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:53 pm

windstorm99 wrote:
Ixolib wrote:Is there a thread/discussion on this somewhere??

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=97757


Thanks!! :)
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

#1335 Postby storms in NC » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:53 pm

I might be reading this wrong but it seem like Wilm is playing this down big time now.

MID LVL FLOW OVER THE SE BECOMES VERY WEAK ON SATURDAY. AT THE SFC
THE HIGH OFF OF THE JERSEY SHORE WILL BE SPITTING INTO A WEAK CELL
THAT WILL REMAIN ACRS THE SERN US AND A STRONGER CENTER ROUGHLY NEAR
37N 62W. THIS WILL ONCE AGAIN LEAD TO A DRY AFTERNOON WITH MAINLY
DIURNAL CU FIELDS. GFS IS SHOWING SOME COPIOUS MID LVL MOISTURE
ADVECTING IN AHEAD OF THE OFFSHORE LOW OVER FAR NERN ZONES. HOWEVER
SINCE THIS IS CURRENTLY THE VERY DRY SIDE OF THE STORM FEEL THAT
THIS IS OVERDONE UNLESS THE SYSTEM WERE TO STRENGTHEN AND BECOME
MUCH DEEPER AND MORE CLOSED OFF...WHICH IS CURRENTLY NOT THE
ACCEPTED SOLN. WILL STILL SHOW INC CLOUDS TO UPPER END PCLDY LATER
IN THE DAY AND THEN MOCLDY INTO SAT NIGHT. LOW END CHANCE POPS WILL
ALSO ACCOMPANY THIS INC IN MOISTURE LATER SAT AND SAT NIGHT.
CONFIDENCE IS ALREADY VERY LOW BY THE END OF THIS PD...AND SHOULD
THE WEAKER/FARTHER EAST SOLN TREND CONTINUE THEN SAT AND SATURDAY
NIGHT MAY END UP WITH A MOCLR AND DRY FCST. OF NOTE THOUGH IS THE
FACT THAT THERE ARE STILL MODEL SOLUTIONS THAT PORTRAY A MUCH
STRONGER WATL RIDGE AND THUS HAVE A MUCH MORE WRLY TRACK WITH THE
SYSTEM.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-5:30 PM TWO at page 67

#1336 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:56 pm

I don't know much about AccuWeather's clients or what they're expecting, but I do know what many industries that hire private meteorologists need in the way of weather information. Let's take the offshore drilling industry, for example. These are the most sensitive operations. I've sat down with engineers prior to the sail out of some VERY BIG deepwater production platform (by very big I mean multi-billion dollar operations) and they've told me that they need a quantitative assessment of the potential hurricane risk out to 10 days. They can't afford to depart port, make the slow 3-4 day journey out to mooring site then take 5-7 days to set at least 4 mooring lines if there is any significant risk of a hurricane impact. Such a strike could cause the loss of the platform and have the potential for damaging other nearby platforms and underwater pipelines.

Because of this, private meteorological firms are being asked for forecasts far and above anything that the NHC is prepared to issue (or needs to, given their main concern of public safety). How would you feel about issuing a 7-day track forecast on a tropical wave, predicting when and where it will develop and how large and strong it could become then communicating to a client the earliest time that a specific location could receive TS or hurricane force winds and the probability of receiving those winds? That's hard enough to do with a named storm, try it with a tropical wave. Like AccuWeather (I assume), we had the need to communicate the potential hurricane risk to our clients on the east coast because they pay us specifically to know of any potential risk out to 7 days and beyond. The difference here is that we only communicate the info to certain key people in each company. The forecasts aren't put out to the general public. Were the screen grabs from AccuWeather's public site or the paid site?

So the above reasons are why I'll sometimes say it isn't too early to make a forecast on a particular disturbance. That's what private meteorological companies have to do - make long-range forecasts when nothing is certain. We don't have the luxury of only discussing potential development over the next 36-48 hours. But we know that it is just as important to communicate to our clients when the risk is diminishing (as it has since late yesterday) so that our clients can "stand-down". I heard JB say today that he's sticking to his guns no matter what I guess only AccuWeather (or their clients) can determine if such a stance is in the clients' best interest. I like Joe, but he does tend to be a bit stubborn. ;-)
0 likes   

User avatar
storms in NC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Wallace,NC 40 miles NE of Wilm
Contact:

Re:

#1337 Postby storms in NC » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:56 pm

pojo wrote:CARCAH has us tasked for tomorrow...we will see how things go in the morning.

By Friday afternoon this will be the talk of the town. Either how the models busted or how fast it build. One or the 2
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1338 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:59 pm

Most likely last visible:

Image
0 likes   

Coredesat

Re: Re:

#1339 Postby Coredesat » Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:02 pm

storms in NC wrote:
pojo wrote:CARCAH has us tasked for tomorrow...we will see how things go in the morning.

By Friday afternoon this will be the talk of the town. Either how the models busted or how fast it build. One or the 2


Well, there were recon missions scheduled for today; both were cancelled.
0 likes   

User avatar
CalmBeforeStorm
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 600
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Stuart, Florida

Re: Invest 99L,Off U.S.E.Coast: Discussions-Analysis & Imagery

#1340 Postby CalmBeforeStorm » Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:03 pm

I think 99L has reminded us that there are very few "shoe ins" when talking about tropical weather forecasting.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 8 guests