Tropical Depression TEN: Model Runs

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

Re:

#201 Postby HollynLA » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:35 am

Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, the northward movement of the GFDL off the FL coast and then the other northward movement of both the GFS and GFDL in the Gulf is very suspect to me. I just cannot see such a sharp turn playing out. Hopefully the 12z GFS and GFDL, with new data, will be more realistic.


EWG, which model do you agree with then?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

Re: Re:

#202 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:44 am

HollynLA wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, the northward movement of the GFDL off the FL coast and then the other northward movement of both the GFS and GFDL in the Gulf is very suspect to me. I just cannot see such a sharp turn playing out. Hopefully the 12z GFS and GFDL, with new data, will be more realistic.


EWG, which model do you agree with then?
I don't really agree 100% with any model right now. Until this becomes a TD, the runs are not always very accurate (since it can be hard to locate the exact center), and I expect more flip flops today and tomorrow. As of this moment though, I am leaning toward what I am hearing from the mets and am going to believe that we will see a Texas or SW Louisiana landfall in the end. According to JB's most recent post, he thinks that while a NOLA scenario is possible, it is still unlikely. I guess we shall see. The next 24-48 hours will certainly be interesting in terms of possible development and model shifts east and west. Hopefully by Friday we will know where this is likely going to go.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#203 Postby Sabanic » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:52 am

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
HollynLA wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, the northward movement of the GFDL off the FL coast and then the other northward movement of both the GFS and GFDL in the Gulf is very suspect to me. I just cannot see such a sharp turn playing out. Hopefully the 12z GFS and GFDL, with new data, will be more realistic.


EWG, which model do you agree with then?
I don't really agree 100% with any model right now. Until this becomes a TD, the runs are not always very accurate (since it can be hard to locate the exact center), and I expect more flip flops today and tomorrow. As of this moment though, I am leaning toward what I am hearing from the mets and am going to believe that we will see a Texas or SW Louisiana landfall in the end. According to JB's most recent post, he thinks that while a NOLA scenario is possible, it is still unlikely. I guess we shall see. The next 24-48 hours will certainly be interesting in terms of possible development and model shifts east and west. Hopefully by Friday we will know where this is likely going to go.


So basically EWG you are like everyone else at this point. We have no clue until a TD forms and we have a defined actual center. I though would not rule out any area of the Gulf Coast this early in the game.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs=6z GFDL at page 10

#204 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:53 am

This morning, I'm trying to understand why the GFS and Euro are so different. As you may recall, AFM said yesterday that a big key to the eventual movement of this system is what the cut-off low off the coast of southern California will do later this week.

The 0z GFS at 96 hrs starts to eject the low into the Rockies:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_096l.gif

BUT ... the 0z Euro at 96 hrs keeps the low back a bit longer and also shears it out over the Rockies, perhaps meaning it erodes the ridge less:

http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/ECMWF/e ... spd_96.gif

Regardless, it's going to be real interesting to watch!
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaFl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1904
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Tampa, FL

Re:

#205 Postby TampaFl » Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:57 am

Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, the northward movement of the GFDL off the FL coast and then the other northward movement of both the GFS and GFDL in the Gulf is very suspect to me. I just cannot see such a sharp turn playing out. Hopefully the 12z GFS and GFDL, with new data, will be more realistic.




Hopefully as in what? (A more west path towards Texas?). What if the 12z GFS & GFDL come in showing basically the same paths as in recent runs? Then what?

If you look at the latest WV loop (http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-wv.html), it appears the ULL is drifting ssw (sitting just off Sarasota & Fort Myers). So why would not the LLC off Miami move to the north then move west across South or South Central Florida into the Gulf.?

From NWS Tampa AFD this morning:

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TAMPA BAY RUSKIN FL
253 AM EDT WED SEP 19 2007

.SHORT TERM (TODAY - FRIDAY)...COMPLEX WEATHER SITUATION BEGINNING
TO UNFOLD AS WEAK LOW PRESSURE DEVELOPS EAST OF SOUTH FLORIDA.
THIS LOW SHOULD MOVE WEST OR NORTHWEST ACROSS SOUTH OR CENTRAL
FLORIDA TODAY...THEN INTO THE EASTERN GULF TONIGHT. THE STRONG
UPPER-LEVEL LOW THAT RECENTLY MOVED ACROSS THE PENINSULA AND INTO
THE EASTERN GULF IS STILL PRODUCING STRONG WIND SHEAR OVER THE
DEVELOPING LOW...BUT TROPICAL OR SUB-TROPICAL DEVELOPMENT IS STILL
POSSIBLE AS THE LOW MOVES INTO THE GULF. SEE LATEST NHC TROPICAL
WEATHER OUTLOOK FOR MORE DETAILS.


With the LLV center rather hard to locate this morning (or untill it becomes better defined), IMHO I do not think at this time there will be much change in the model runs.

This system will be developing very slowly for the next 24 - 36 hours, so time will tell.

Thoughts & comments welcomed.

Robert 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145285
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs=6z GFDL at page 10

#206 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:04 am

0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs=6z GFDL at page 10

#207 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:10 am



Takes it to about 80mph
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re:

#208 Postby ronjon » Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:58 am

Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, the northward movement of the GFDL off the FL coast and then the other northward movement of both the GFS and GFDL in the Gulf is very suspect to me. I just cannot see such a sharp turn playing out. Hopefully the 12z GFS and GFDL, with new data, will be more realistic.



EWG, I wouldn't focus on the "suspect" north movement on each individual model run but where it goes in 72-96 hrs. I agree with you that maybe a more gradual W-NW or NW movement would probably occur once it forms in the eastern GOM. But as wxman57 said yesterday, it doesn't take much of a shift in direction to impact the northern Gulf Coast by 400 miles difference (say the diff between W-NW or NW). The GFS and UKMET are apparently weakening the western edge of the ridge becuz they are more progressive with the piece of energy off the CA coast that will move east and northeast. As I said earlier, this mornings HPC preliminary discussion seemed to buy into the GFS reasoning. I don't have an opinion one way or the other but there you have it. I know wxman57 probably feels otherwise but that's why weather is so unpredictable.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#209 Postby PTPatrick » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:03 am

in respect to the GFDL's north motion east of FLorida...there isnt even a LLC yet, so any guess at how its moving int he next 24 hours is suspect to say the least. BUT if you look at the over movment on the clouds and storms...I could see why GFDL would put a low down and try to move it north a little. Could the GFDL also be trying to put a low down and sort of "rotate" it within the overall midlevel circulation? just a thought
0 likes   

User avatar
Sjones
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#210 Postby Sjones » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:13 am

Does anyone have the latest CMC model out of curiousity? It picked up on Dean and Humberto so, I'm just curious as to what it would show...
0 likes   

Johnny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1428
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: No Snow For You, Texas

#211 Postby Johnny » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:21 am

It seems to me that their is no model agreement simply because we don't have a defined system....obviously. When this thing starts getting it's act together over the gulf then I will start paying attention. Till then, it's just for entertainment purposes. :D
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#212 Postby miamicanes177 » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:22 am

Code: Select all

TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1315 UTC WED SEP 19 2007
 
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
 
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
 
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL932007) 20070919 1200 UTC
 
        ...00 HRS...   ...12 HRS...   ...24 HRS. ..   ...36 HRS...
        070919  1200   070920  0000   070920  1200   070921  0000
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    27.2N  79.9W   27.8N  81.2W   28.7N  82.7W   29.6N  84.2W
BAMD    27.2N  79.9W   28.5N  81.2W   29.6N  82.9W   30.4N  84.8W
BAMM    27.2N  79.9W   28.0N  81.3W   28.9N  82.8W   29.7N  84.4W
LBAR    27.2N  79.9W   28.3N  80.9W   29.5N  82.0W   31.0N  82.8W
SHIP        25KTS          31KTS          39KTS          49KTS
DSHP        25KTS          25KTS          30KTS          39KTS
 
        ...48 HRS...   ...72 HRS...   ...96 HRS. ..   ..120 HRS...
        070921  1200   070922  1200   070923  1200   070924  1200
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    30.6N  85.9W   32.6N  88.9W   34.9N  92.4W   39.1N  93.7W
BAMD    31.0N  86.7W   31.8N  90.0W   34.5N  94.2W   41.1N  93.4W
BAMM    30.6N  86.1W   32.3N  88.9W   34.6N  92.4W   39.1N  93.9W
LBAR    32.4N  83.8W   34.6N  84.7W   34.8N  84.1W   35.4N  84.5W
SHIP        57KTS          65KTS          62KTS          64KTS
DSHP        32KTS          27KTS          27KTS          28KTS
 
         ...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR =  27.2N LONCUR =  79.9W DIRCUR = 335DEG SPDCUR =   6KT
LATM12 =  26.0N LONM12 =  79.3W DIRM12 = 331DEG SPDM12 =   5KT
LATM24 =  25.5N LONM24 =  78.9W
WNDCUR =   25KT RMAXWD =  120NM WNDM12 =   25KT
CENPRS = 1010MB OUTPRS = 1014MB OUTRAD =  180NM SDEPTH =   M
RD34NE =    0NM RD34SE =    0NM RD34SW =    0NM RD34NW =   0NM
 
$$
NNNN
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#213 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:24 am

Image
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#214 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:30 am

They're initializing a sfc low much further N (off the east-central FL coast near Stuart). Earlier, it was initialized off Miami, FL. That's a significant northward shift.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#215 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:32 am

Due to the fact that the mess east of Florida is so disorganized, I'm not sure how anyone can have much confidence in ANY model run or initialization at this point.
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#216 Postby Agua » Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:39 am

Portastorm wrote:Due to the fact that the mess east of Florida is so disorganized, I'm not sure how anyone can have much confidence in ANY model run or initialization at this point.


Absolutely. Without a defined llc, these things are junk. Further, the BAMs are useless outside of the deep tropics.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#217 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:14 am

since the BAMM is onshore in 48 hours, may be best to set the SHIPS output aside
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#218 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:49 am

I do put thought in these models this early. The same thing was said when earlier storms were trying to form. They do all form something so that is something to pay attention to PLUS we are within 4 days now of a landfall somewhere on the Gulf coast!
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#219 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:54 am

Wx_Warrior wrote:I do put thought in these models this early. The same thing was said when earlier storms were trying to form. They do all form something so that is something to pay attention to PLUS we are within 4 days now of a landfall somewhere on the Gulf coast!


You mean two days per some if not most of the models.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: INVEST 93L: Model Runs

#220 Postby Ivanhater » Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:31 am

12Z NAM...

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests