Invest 92L Near Leewards- Discussions & Images

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 52
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#241 Postby Vortex » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:27 pm

Tampa, thanks for your input...
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5596
Age: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re:

#242 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:34 pm

Vortex wrote:Tampa, thanks for your input...


Your welcome

but I am still confused- I felt more confident in the ridge
scenario after reading your analyses throughout the day,
but the NWS discussion I posted earlier also points to
2 troughs in quick series- So my confidence in what
may happen is very low. Vortex, what do you
think of all this? I saw the model runs you posted
pointed to a very strong ridge, but do you
think the ridge will exceed the trough
in terms of strength? This is the point that
is of utmost uncertainty to me.

Why I have been making such an issue of these features
is my friends and I are watching for a tropical storm
to bring some rain- thats more of a wishcast, but it
is the reason why 92L is so much of a big deal for me.

Of course nobody wants a hurricane, but I am
really wanting to know as much as I can about
this trough versus ridge battle taking place.
0 likes   

User avatar
windstorm99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1578
Age: 46
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida
Contact:

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#243 Postby windstorm99 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:35 pm

If this keeps up i can see the NHC by tommorow if not at 530am at 1130am say development of this wave is no longer anticipated as upper level winds are unfavorable.

Might it refire sometime this evening sure but it just went poof as its been doing the past few days which in all honesty its normal for somehing that does not have low level convergence.

Overall well see what takes place later this evening into tommorow morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5596
Age: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#244 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:37 pm

windstorm99 wrote:If this keeps up i can see the NHC by tommorow if not at 530am at 1130am say development of this wave is no longer anticipated as upper level winds are unfavorable.

Might it refire sometime this evening sure but it just went poof as its been doing the past few days which in all honesty its normal for somehing that does not have low level convergence.

Overall well see what takes place later this evening into tommorow morning.


I agree that this system in many respects (intensity and track) is a wait and see
system. With favorable conditions near the bahamas...IMO more likely to develop
than not..
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#245 Postby destruction92 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:40 pm

POOF! :spam:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
windstorm99
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1578
Age: 46
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 8:10 am
Location: Miami, Florida
Contact:

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#246 Postby windstorm99 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:41 pm

destruction92 wrote:POOF! :spam:

Image



You can say that again lol...
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5596
Age: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#247 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:42 pm

Not poof.
Look at that well-defined circulation. One burst of
convection and this will take off.
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re:

#248 Postby destruction92 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:44 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Not poof.
Look at that well-defined circulation. One burst of
convection and this will take off.


I would agree with you but there is only a mid level circulation...which means nothing is going to happen in the short term.
For now, 92L can be kissed goodbye if it does not develop a low level circulation very very soon.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#249 Postby RL3AO » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:46 pm

Some people give up too easily.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139603
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#250 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:47 pm

Already the dead posts are appearing with a invest that is lees than 12 hour old? :)
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#251 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:48 pm

As I said earlier, this was never an impressive system

Never had a LLC... didn't we learn from the infamous 99L that never had a LLC? Cannot sustain convection with the LLC to focus the low level convergence
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#252 Postby RL3AO » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:50 pm

I think Dean, Felix and Gabby were all called dead at some point by multiple people while an invest. I think some people called Dean dead while it was a weak TS too.
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re:

#253 Postby destruction92 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:51 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:As I said earlier, this was never an impressive system

Never had a LLC... didn't we learn from the infamous 99L that never had a LLC? Cannot sustain convection with the LLC to focus the low level convergence


derek, i agree with you. what was i thinking earlier today? :oops:
0 likes   

User avatar
wzrgirl1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re: Invest 92L ENE of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#254 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:52 pm

i think that this thing is going to be history by the time we wake up tomorrow...We have an upper low to its NW & another one close to its NE which is tearing this system apart unless those two separate quickly this may just dissipate
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#255 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:53 pm

92L had Convection earlier and it didn't "Take off".


I find this all rather ironic when earlier today I was seeing "TD at 10PM" posts.


I'd have to say "Dropped from NRL at 10PM" seems more logical now. This system just doesn't have the organization to hold together long enough to get anything going.

I personally believe 90L has a better chance to develop than this. 90L just needs a reduction in wind shear while 92L needs more surface convergence and a wind shear reduction.


Now don't get me wrong, i'm not altogether "writing this thing off", but i'm thinking with some confidence now if something were to spin up, it ain't going to be a SFL Major Hurricane you guys can breath easy.

With that i'm going to estimate..this storm needs another 96-120 Hours to become named, too close to SFL to organize into a major.
0 likes   

User avatar
wzrgirl1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:44 am
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida

Re:

#256 Postby wzrgirl1 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:53 pm

RL3AO wrote:Some people give up too easily.


and some people are realistic while others are not
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#257 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:53 pm

Watch 91L that is a real invest. In it could be something "big" in the coming days. This could also form convection tonight, and has to be watched. But it has less chance.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139603
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 92L East of Leewards-Discussions-& Images

#258 Postby cycloneye » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:54 pm

Is time to focus on the big one to the east.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#259 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:54 pm

September means that anything can develop, and this system has already proven that it has been organizing over the past 24 hrs and will continue to do so over the next few days. DMIN = less convection, DMAX = increase in convection. Gabrielle proved that coming back from the dead is possible!
0 likes   

destruction92
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:43 pm

Re:

#260 Postby destruction92 » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:92L had Convection earlier and it didn't "Take off".


I find this all rather ironic when earlier today I was seeing "TD at 10PM" posts.


I'd have to say "Dropped from NRL at 10PM" seems more logical now. This system just doesn't have the organization to hold together long enough to get anything going.

I personally believe 90L has a better chance to develop than this. 90L just needs a reduction in wind shear while 92L needs more surface convergence and a wind shear reduction.


Now don't get me wrong, i'm not altogether "writing this thing off", but i'm thinking with some confidence now if something were to spin up, it ain't going to be a SFL Major Hurricane you guys can breath easy.

With that i'm going to estimate..this storm needs another 96-120 Hours to become named, too close to SFL to organize into a major.



All the pro-mets here (including Derek Ortt, Wxman57, etc.) believe that 90L has the least chance of developing of the 3 invests...not to burst your bubble since you are Gulf Coast resident and concerned about your neck of the woods.

Although 90L has more convection, is does not contain a LLC or even a MLC...just some "eddies" according to I think Wxman57...which reminds me, I kind of like Eddie's ice cream but I think Ben and Jerry's is a bit better...but now I don't eat anymore of that crap.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests