Derek Ortt wrote:SHIPS is off of the wrong low. The globals are fine. BAMM is not
Thank you...The globals are developing the correct low people! Just look at the 12 hr position..geez
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Derek Ortt wrote:SHIPS is off of the wrong low. The globals are fine. BAMM is not
skysummit wrote:Oddly enough, the 00z NAM looks pretty accurate right now....it looked pretty accurate from the start. It never showed the low off the east coast. It instead develops the low off the west coast.
And there you have it. I am disagreeing for all the right reasons. Models that are initialized wrong and disagreed with by the mets are not to be trusted. Personally, I expect a huge shift back west in the models tomorrow when/if a new location is initialized as the "center" SW of Florida. New Orleans is still possible, but I personally think it is the far east scenario. JMO.
Ivanhater wrote:People...stop saying just because they have the "wrong" low, they should be thrown out...GFS actually develops the low off SW Florida and STILL moves it NW...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests