INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#841 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:35 pm

Thanks AFM. Got to take the dogs to vet tomorrow myself.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yankeegirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3417
Age: 49
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: Cy-Fair, Northwest Houston
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#842 Postby Yankeegirl » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:39 pm

Sheesh.... I work at a vet... I am always at the vet!!! So whats the word, if the center is more to the north is the track going to be more to the north?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#843 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:40 pm

A nice visible loop before the sun sets...

http://adds.aviationweather.gov/satelli ... &itype=vis

...If the center relocates under that blob overnight, then we may wake up to a whole new ball game tomorrow.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#844 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:41 pm

reminds me of Claudette when it was forming in the Carib... beautiful sat appearance but nothing at the surface. This one has me baffled
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

Re:

#845 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:42 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:A nice visible loop before the sun sets...

http://adds.aviationweather.gov/satelli ... &itype=vis

...If the center relocates under that blob overnight, then we may wake up to a whole new ball game tomorrow.


Thanks that is a nice looking satellite view....
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#846 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:42 pm

weatherguru18 wrote:Local media in Houston are very concerned over a developing system. Dr. Neil Frank of KHOU and former Hurricane Center Director says that watches/warnings may be posted while we sleep and wake up and have no time to prepare. I'm just expecting a lot of rain. I don't see what the big deal is.


Some of the EOM officials are a little upset at the NHC that they did not pull the trigger at 4 pm for that very reason. I is certainly going to develop and it certainly is a closed low. Chances are there are winds out there somewhere not sampled by the aircraft that are around 30 mph. TD's that don't have a well defined center are upgraded all the time. There are plenty of gyres in the GoM that don't have a VORTEX message sent out.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#847 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:43 pm

Yankeegirl wrote:Sheesh.... I work at a vet... I am always at the vet!!! So whats the word, if the center is more to the north is the track going to be more to the north?


Yes....if the center reforms 100 miles to the north...move all those forecast tracks north 100 miles.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#848 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:44 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
weatherguru18 wrote:Local media in Houston are very concerned over a developing system. Dr. Neil Frank of KHOU and former Hurricane Center Director says that watches/warnings may be posted while we sleep and wake up and have no time to prepare. I'm just expecting a lot of rain. I don't see what the big deal is.


Some of the EOM officials are a little upset at the NHC that they did not pull the trigger at 4 pm for that very reason. I is certainly going to develop and it certainly is a closed low. Chances are there are winds out there somewhere not sampled by the aircraft that are around 30 mph. TD's that don't have a well defined center are upgraded all the time. There are plenty of gyres in the GoM that don't have a VORTEX message sent out.

The gulf is of serious concern, IMO. I see no reason why the system will not become a hurricane before making landfall close to Galveston.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#849 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:44 pm

New GFDL (text only) initializes Tropical Disturbance 91L at 22.9ºN & 90.1ºW. It reaches the coast in 36 hours at 25.5º & 96.8º
I believe the center is reforming, based by staring intently with non-met trained eyes, around 24º, maybe even 24.5º

So, if all else were assumed to be correct, then landfall would be about 1.5º North of 25.5º, or around 27º. or near where Bret made landfall.


Just an assumption.
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#850 Postby Bailey1777 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:45 pm

AirForceMet if you had to put a cone on this one what would it be.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#851 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:46 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Yankeegirl wrote:Sheesh.... I work at a vet... I am always at the vet!!! So whats the word, if the center is more to the north is the track going to be more to the north?


Yes....if the center reforms 100 miles to the north...move all those forecast tracks north 100 miles.



AFM- good job in predicting the center reformation last night........yes I am sucking up..... :lol:
0 likes   

mgpetre
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:20 pm

Re:

#852 Postby mgpetre » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:48 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:AirForceMet if you had to put a cone on this one what would it be.


Yes a cone of uncertainty by a pro would prepare a lot of us better. It's going to be a short haul to the coast, can you help us be prepared if we need to be?
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#853 Postby ROCK » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:48 pm

Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
weatherguru18 wrote:Local media in Houston are very concerned over a developing system. Dr. Neil Frank of KHOU and former Hurricane Center Director says that watches/warnings may be posted while we sleep and wake up and have no time to prepare. I'm just expecting a lot of rain. I don't see what the big deal is.


Some of the EOM officials are a little upset at the NHC that they did not pull the trigger at 4 pm for that very reason. I is certainly going to develop and it certainly is a closed low. Chances are there are winds out there somewhere not sampled by the aircraft that are around 30 mph. TD's that don't have a well defined center are upgraded all the time. There are plenty of gyres in the GoM that don't have a VORTEX message sent out.

The gulf is of serious concern, IMO. I see no reason why the system will not become a hurricane before making landfall close to Galveston.




Galveston? I was thinking more closer to Matagorda and points south. On intensity I think you could be right. Funny, only Dr Frank is the only local MET concerned......I have told my inlaws to move there beach house stuff inside. They live near Freeport....
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#854 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:49 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:AirForceMet if you had to put a cone on this one what would it be.


Depending on how far the center tucks under the convection...b/w CRP and Port O'Conner is my guess....but closer to CRP.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#855 Postby RL3AO » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:53 pm

Coming back for another pass.
0 likes   

pojo
Military Member
Military Member
Posts: 8016
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Houston

Re:

#856 Postby pojo » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:54 pm

RL3AO wrote:Coming back for another pass.

we have time fixes that we need to hit... thus the reason for another pass.
0 likes   

User avatar
A1A
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Re:

#857 Postby A1A » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:57 pm

Sean in New Orleans wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:A nice visible loop before the sun sets...

http://adds.aviationweather.gov/satelli ... &itype=vis

...If the center relocates under that blob overnight, then we may wake up to a whole new ball game tomorrow.


Thanks that is a nice looking satellite view....


That's neat - you can see the lower level clouds turning counter clockwise and the upper level turning clockwise!
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

#858 Postby Normandy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:57 pm

A1A, thats a sign of really good upper air support....building anti-cyclone over a developing cyclone.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: INVEST 91L -Discussions,Analysis and Imagery

#859 Postby MiamiensisWx » Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:00 pm

I think an STDS (and an upgrade to TD) is warranted withn the next 30 minutes. I believe there is sufficient proof for a possible TD. Grace lacked the evidence, but it was upgraded. I hope a risky precedent isn't being set here - people should be aware of the situation. If Air Force Met's statement about EOM people is correct, I think the TPC should "play it safe" and give this system the classification it deserves - warnings and watches should be issued soon for the TX coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#860 Postby KatDaddy » Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:00 pm

Yep. That aint good at all :) No really. Its not good You can see the feederbands developing. This is go very quick with the upper air support.
0 likes   


Return to “2007”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests