ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
physicx07
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:46 am
Location: Miami

Re:

#10261 Postby physicx07 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:49 am

WxGuy1 wrote:000
URNT12 KNHC 120621
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE AL092008
A. 12/05:46:20Z
B. 26 deg 23 min N
091 deg 08 min W
C. 700 mb 2729 m
D. 71 kt
E. 135 deg 41 nm
F. 221 deg 090 kt
G. 134 deg 051 nm
H. 957 mb
I. 10 C/ 3052 m
J. 15 C/ 3051 m
K. 14 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/7
O. 0.02 / 1 nm
P. AF308 3009A IKE OB 16
MAX OUTBOUND AND FL WIND 108 KT NE QUAD 06:07:00 Z
MAX OUTBOUND AND SFC WIND 84 KT NE QUAD 06:08:00 Z

Pressure up, FL winds up. At least there is an ob to support the current SFC winds.



No eye?
0 likes   

User avatar
AZRainman
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:48 pm
Location: Sonoran Desert
Contact:

#10262 Postby AZRainman » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:50 am

Forecasters at the National Weather Service office in Lake Charles are warning that storm surge with Hurricane Ike could be more than 20 feet above sea level by noon Friday, causing the seawall in Port Arthur to be overtopped by about 6 feet. source

MAXIMUM WATER LEVELS FORECAST:

GULF-FACING COASTLINE WEST OF SARGENT...5 TO 8 FEET

SHORELINE OF MATAGORDA BAY...4 TO 7 FEET

GULF-FACING COASTLINE SARGENT TO HIGH ISLAND
INCLUDING GALVESTON ISLAND......12 TO 16 FEET

SHORELINE OF GALVESTON BAY...15 TO 25 FEET. source



Ike's Storm Surge Closes Florida Panhandle Highway

Texas holdouts urge Hurricane Ike to "bring it on!"
Last edited by AZRainman on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:02 am, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

Nexus
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:13 am

#10263 Postby Nexus » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:52 am

Ike's chaotic octopus center is really showing some convection now. He's still tossing off potential CDO reinforcement as feeder bands though, almost like he has to due to his gigantic size (06:09z):

Image
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10264 Postby Rod Hagen » Fri Sep 12, 2008 1:56 am

Jijenji wrote:Looks like its correcting back to the NW.

Looks on track right now.



The 11/ 2100Z 11th Sept forecast (which gave a landfall SW of Galveston) had the anticipated location at 12/0600Z at 26.6N 90.9W

The location at 12/0600Z is given as 26.4N 91.1 W

(Edit - whoops - scrub the earlier times mentioned - misread the data!)

It is .2ºW and .2ºS of the earlier predicted location at this time, so still tracking a bit SW of forecast
Last edited by Rod Hagen on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Shoshana
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1414
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:50 pm
Location: NE Austin

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10265 Postby Shoshana » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:00 am

If Ike comes in south and a little faster will that mean he might get further west inland before turning north?
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38109
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10266 Postby Brent » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:02 am

Eclipse over

Image
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10267 Postby Rod Hagen » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:05 am

Shoshana wrote:If Ike comes in south and a little faster will that mean he might get further west inland before turning north?


Who knows, Shoshana! Yesterday Ike was northeast of the forecast lines (leading them to eventually shift the landfall prediction further north east) for much of the time.

For the last 12 hours its been south west of it . Still time for changes.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10268 Postby lrak » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:10 am

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42002

the other buoys are still high compared to this one, I wonder where the edge of the high pressue is?
Last edited by lrak on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Shoshana
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1414
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:50 pm
Location: NE Austin

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10269 Postby Shoshana » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:11 am

Rod Hagen wrote:
Shoshana wrote:If Ike comes in south and a little faster will that mean he might get further west inland before turning north?


Who knows, Shoshana! Yesterday Ike was northeast of the forecast lines (leading them to eventually shift the landfall prediction further north east) for much of the time.

For the last 12 hours its been south west of it . Still time for changes.


True :)
0 likes   

User avatar
AZRainman
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:48 pm
Location: Sonoran Desert
Contact:

#10270 Postby AZRainman » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:18 am

Image
Image
Last edited by AZRainman on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10271 Postby lrak » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:24 am

I'm still freaking on the westward motion.
0 likes   

serenata09
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 166
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:55 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10272 Postby serenata09 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:26 am

lrak wrote:I'm still freaking on the westward motion.


Link to the radar you are looking at Irak?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Cheese
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 12:40 am
Location: Green Bay, WI (UWGB Earth Science Alum)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10273 Postby Hurricane Cheese » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:28 am

A monster no doubt, but Rita and Katrina still rule the GOM roost. This could definitely be one of the worst Cat 2's I can remember though.
0 likes   

Sonica
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 30
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: shop's in Baton Rouge-house in Walker
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10274 Postby Sonica » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:36 am

Jijenji wrote:It's showing it on all the satellites now. Huge explosion on the south side of the storm.

It's exploding! It will be at least a 3 IMO!
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38109
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10275 Postby Brent » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:39 am

There's more convection but it still looks disorganized to me. I don't forsee any significant strengthening in the short-term.

Edit: Recon reports pressure down a little to 955 mb and a new partial eyewall with a 20-mile wide eye trying to form.
Last edited by Brent on Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:42 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

superfly

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10276 Postby superfly » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:40 am

Sonica wrote:It's exploding! It will be at least a 3 IMO!


It's not "exploding." It's a mess right now with the western side of the storm completely missing on microwave. The middle "CDO" is what's left of the inner eyewall and there is a clear moat between that area and the dominant outer eyewall.

Image
0 likes   

Sonica
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 30
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:07 pm
Location: shop's in Baton Rouge-house in Walker
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10277 Postby Sonica » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:45 am

superfly wrote:
Sonica wrote:It's exploding! It will be at least a 3 IMO!


It's not "exploding." It's a mess right now with the western side of the storm completely missing on microwave. The middle "CDO" is what's left of the inner eyewall and there is a clear moat between that area and the dominant outer eyewall.

Image


Yeah, sorry but it's true!
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1705
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#10278 Postby bob rulz » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:46 am

This might just be the most stubborn storm we've ever tracked.

It's really agonizing tracking this thing. We've been thinking that it was going to strengthen for days now. I couldn't imagine what it's like for you people in Texas that are right in the path of this thing.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1705
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#10279 Postby bob rulz » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:54 am

Does this thing actually have a closed inner eyewall or is the new outer eyewall already starting to take over?
0 likes   

physicx07
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:46 am
Location: Miami

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10280 Postby physicx07 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:54 am

Brent wrote:There's more convection but it still looks disorganized to me. I don't forsee any significant strengthening in the short-term.

Edit: Recon reports pressure down a little to 955 mb and a new partial eyewall with a 20-mile wide eye trying to form.


Yep, and a 93kt dropsonde surface wind.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests