Very few times has a 108-132+ hr forecast verified within 50-100 miles. Sure, it happens (the NHC forecast for Katrina was nearly spot-on a couple of days in advance), but it's much more common to see 100-200-250 mile errors at that forecast range. It does lend some credence to the general forecast to see several models showing a similar forecast, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
I recall one tropical cyclone last year (or 2006) that was forecast by the GFDL to be a Cat 4 that moved from northern FL to New Orleans. Lo and behold, the storm never crossed FL. At any rate, lets not get too antsy yet. The track of the storm
will be significantly affected by the storm intensity, and the intensity forecast is particularly difficult right now given the relative disorganization of Gustav at this time.
I'm not saying the forecast won't verify; I'm just saying that it's not worth the effort or anxiety to mull over a >100 hour forecast (one that assumes a Cat 4-5 storm 2-4 days in advance)! Or do we forget how terrible some models can be?
