ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re: Re:

#11501 Postby dhweather » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:11 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
dhweather wrote:AT&T is encouraging people to use text messages instead of phone calls.


of course they are, most people have limited text plans and the cash register starts ringing sooner rather than later, someone please tell me att is doing the right thing and giving people unlimted texting


I would hope so. I do know that during Katrina, text messages worked fine though voice calls would not go through. Perhaps they simply want the available bandwidth for voice calls to be available for emergencies (I know, the whole thing is one)
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11502 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:11 pm

It looks a lot better on IR right now, huge eye clearing out, with cold convection wraping around. Also on radar shows that it is trying to wrap into a tighter eye, so maybe this can strengthen to 110 and 115 mph is not out of the woods. I don't know if I will "call" this the big one because it is possible for a more powerful cyclone to occur, but this should be very bad indeed for anyone that stayed behind. Lets hope they find higher ground.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re:

#11503 Postby fasterdisaster » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:11 pm

dhweather wrote:Ed Rappaport just said they are now starting to do the two hour updates


This is because (you probably know, just making sure others do) the entire eye is now visible on radar.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11504 Postby Category 5 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:12 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:It looks a lot better on IR right now, huge eye clearing out, with cold convection wraping around. Also on radar shows that it is trying to wrap into a tighter eye, so maybe this can strengthen to 110 and 115 mph is not out of the woods. I don't know if I will "call" this the big one because it is possible for a more powerful cyclone to occur, but this should be very bad indeed for anyone that stayed behind. Lets hope they find higher ground.


This certainly isn't going to be the big one, but it will be bad enough.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11505 Postby jinftl » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:12 pm

sorry...messed up name of hotel....yep that is where the media is centered i guess.. .reporter turned to windows of hotel and said those will be blowing out soon. now they are talking to anderson cooper in houston....different world...barely a breeze.....for now


JenBayles wrote:
jinftl wrote:CNN Reporter at San Luis hotel in Galveston just said he did not want his crew staying on Galveston but got overruled and is here against his objection. Wow.


Doesn't the San Leon have an old WWII bunker underneath? I believe that's where Galveston EOM is riding out the storm. It might just be one of the safest places around at this point.
0 likes   

physicx07
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 7:46 am
Location: Miami

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11506 Postby physicx07 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:13 pm

If we see the eye shrinking...watch out!
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11507 Postby MiamiensisWx » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:13 pm

OT: Radar indicates movement is closer to west after the NW wobble...
Last edited by MiamiensisWx on Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#11508 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:14 pm

Image

Looking better now.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11509 Postby rtd2 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:14 pm

JenBayles wrote:
jinftl wrote:CNN Reporter at San Luis hotel in Galveston just said he did not want his crew staying on Galveston but got overruled and is here against his objection. Wow.


Doesn't the San Leon have an old WWII bunker underneath? I believe that's where Galveston EOM is riding out the storm. It might just be one of the safest places around at this point.





UNDERNEATH? I would be going :uarrow:
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11510 Postby dhweather » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:14 pm

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:Don't know if this has been asked today or not. But why is the NHC and others having such a hard time forecasting intensity of these gulf storms this year. Not complaining at all, but with Gustav, Edouard, Fay, and now Ike they were preaching about cat 4 sometimes even cat 5 coming through the gulf. Upon landfall they have been a lot weaker then predicted. Are the conditions just not as favorable as thinking, water temps lower than normal, shear, dry air, etc. etc???? Just trying to figure out what is going in the gulf this year. For instance over here in SE LA we only got about 1 inch of rain since midnight. Forecast was for 3-4 with higher isolated amounts through today. Winds have only been in low 30's tops, now almost dead calm. That is way less than what we usually receive from a hurricane making landfall just to the west of us(rain wise)


They easily admit their ability to forecast intensity is poor at best. Given all of the dynamics, its very difficult to predict intensity more than a few hours out.

As for Ike, he does seem to be a very low rainfaill hurricane - Gus was much wetter, rain everywhere.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cape Verde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 564
Age: 70
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: Houston area

#11511 Postby Cape Verde » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:14 pm

I am about 60 miles NW of Galveston, west of downtown Houston by 30 miles or so, depending on what you call downtown.

You'd hardly know that Galveston was already getting beat up. I can see the tropical circulation of clouds, but winds are breezy, but not more than 15 or 20 mph sustained, if that.

I've been watching the local news all afternoon, and it's as if Galveston was on another planet. This is 60 miles away, and they're already having gusts in excess of 60 mph.

I'm not suggesting that I'll miss Ike. I'll probably get it quite suddenly. But the NW quadrant of this storm is quite docile.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11512 Postby Category 5 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:14 pm

CYCLONE MIKE wrote:Don't know if this has been asked today or not. But why is the NHC and others having such a hard time forecasting intensity of these gulf storms this year. Not complaining at all, but with Gustav, Edouard, Fay, and now Ike they were preaching about cat 4 sometimes even cat 5 coming through the gulf. Upon landfall they have been a lot weaker then predicted. Are the conditions just not as favorable as thinking, water temps lower than normal, shear, dry air, etc. etc???? Just trying to figure out what is going in the gulf this year. For instance over here in SE LA we only got about 1 inch of rain since midnight. Forecast was for 3-4 with higher isolated amounts through today. Winds have only been in low 30's tops, now almost dead calm. That is way less than what we usually receive from a hurricane making landfall just to the west of us(rain wise)


Intensity forecasts aren't really an exact science.
0 likes   

smw1981
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Alabamer

Re: Re:

#11513 Postby smw1981 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:15 pm

dhweather wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
dhweather wrote:AT&T is encouraging people to use text messages instead of phone calls.


of course they are, most people have limited text plans and the cash register starts ringing sooner rather than later, someone please tell me att is doing the right thing and giving people unlimted texting


I would hope so. I do know that during Katrina, text messages worked fine though voice calls would not go through. Perhaps they simply want the available bandwidth for voice calls to be available for emergencies (I know, the whole thing is one)


Text messages were the only thing that would work for me during Katrina (in Mississippi and Mobile, AL). My cell phone carrier (Then it was either Alltel or T-Mobile) did take off all charges for text messages and gave us a free month of service on top of that. The only thing that will stop the text messaging is if a large range of cell towers go down where you cannot even roam to send a text. Hopefully everyone has charged their cell phone AND has a car charger to keep their cell charged!
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11514 Postby Category 5 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:16 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
Category 5 wrote:This certainly isn't going to be the big one, but it will be bad enough.

I disagree... I would argue that there can be more than one "big one."

I COMPLETELY agree with the last portion.

OT: Radar indicates movement is closer to west after the NW wobble...


I see your point, but I'm referring to THE big one, the one where we don't say "it could have been worse".

Looking alot better on satellite, this is worrisome.
0 likes   

bighaben
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 32
Age: 36
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:48 am
Location: The Woodlands, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#11515 Postby bighaben » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:16 pm

Sorry if this is a stupid question:

But when is the next update from the hurricane center?
0 likes   

NEXRAD
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 370
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:05 am
Location: South Florida

Re:

#11516 Postby NEXRAD » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:17 pm

Cape Verde wrote:I am about 60 miles NW of Galveston, west of downtown Houston by 30 miles or so, depending on what you call downtown.

You'd hardly know that Galveston was already getting beat up. I can see the tropical circulation of clouds, but winds are breezy, but not more than 15 or 20 mph sustained, if that.

I've been watching the local news all afternoon, and it's as if Galveston was on another planet. This is 60 miles away, and they're already having gusts in excess of 60 mph.

I'm not suggesting that I'll miss Ike. I'll probably get it quite suddenly. But the NW quadrant of this storm is quite docile.


From my experiences with Frances and Jeanne, conditions tend to be pretty calm until the first rain-shield bands move through, then conditions quickly deteriorate.

- Jay
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re:

#11517 Postby rtd2 » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:18 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

Looking better now.





wow away for an hour and the FIST has certainly wrapped around....I hope folks who stayed the best i'm sure we will here many stories of survival and rescue...Praying for all in this path
0 likes   

User avatar
DanKellFla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1291
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Lake Worth, Florida

#11518 Postby DanKellFla » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:18 pm

Just another example of how every storm is different. "Just" a Cat 2. But the windfield is huge and has plenty of time in the gulf to create a big surge.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#11519 Postby dhweather » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:18 pm

On Houston radar, it appears the eye is contracting and closing in - that would not be a good thing.

It also appears that the track is right at due west.
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

#11520 Postby Rod Hagen » Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:20 pm

In some ways, I suspect, the existence of rapid information flow, the following of every twist and turn, etc etc may even add to the vacillation that we see here. In the "old days" the best information local authorities would have got amounted to "big hurricane headed in our general direction" with the simple choice of "lets go or lets stay". These days it is "its heading this way, its heading that way, if it strikes ten miles to the right everything will be OK, its strengthening, its weakening". etc etc.

This encourages authorities (and people in general) to try to micromanage the situation, wait for that extra bit of information, see silver linings where there aren't any etc. etc, and, above all, to try to delay decisions until they know what the "real" answer is (which never truly arrives until the storm does, of course.)

The real time to make decisions here was BEFORE all the information was in. Before it was even clear whether it was going to hit Corpus Christi, or Galveston or Louisiana. Once it was pretty much aimed at Texas, given its size, it was time to make the decision all along this stretch of coast. So pretty much three or four days ago was the cutoff point. Instead we've seen a period of humming and hahing as the final twists and turns have unfolded. People haven't been able to see the wood for the trees, I fear, and it is going to cost many of them everything.

Rod
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests