wxman57 wrote:For those of you who are fans of the ECMWF, it's done pretty badly with Fay. For example, last evening's run had Fay near 27.2N/82.3W at 00Z tonight (now). That's south of Sarasota, FL and about 135nm SW of Fay's actual position. This morning's ECMWF initialized Fay near 27.3N/82.3W, or about the same area south of Sarasota, which is 110+ miles WSW of where Fay actually was at 12Z this morning. It kept Fay in the same place until 12Z tomorrow (near Sarasota on the west coast) and only moved it north to Tampa Bay on Friday morning. Clearly, the one model bringing Fay out into the Gulf is pure garbage.
Oh, and how'd last night's GFS run do compared to the EC? It had Fay near 28.9N/81.1W, just a little west of where it is now. I think I'd put my money on any model BUT the ECMWF for Fay.
To get into the Gulf and have any significant time over water, Fay would have to track toward 275 degrees or less from its current location. A track of 279 degrees takes it over water briefly between the peninsula and the panhandle. A track toward 285 degrees keeps the center inland. So the chances of Fay entering the Gulf for anything but a brief period are quite low. Most likely, it'll move inland tomorrow morning and weaken to a depression by tomorrow night/Friday morning.
Wxman - you neglected to mention that last night's (00Z) GFS run, which is indeed verifying very well, brings Fay on a nearly due west track and keeps Fay over the northern Gulf for several days. However, the 12z GFS has been verifying much more poorly. The 12z GFS has Fay at 29.2N 81.4W at 00z, while its actual position is over 60 miles to the east-southeast! Heck, the 12z GFS has Fay on the west coast of Florida by 6z. I would be shocked if that verified. I would be very skeptical of the 12z GFS track and any models based off the 12z GFS - i.e. the HWRF and GFDL. I wonder if the 12z GFS's failure is due to model spin-up - it usually takes about 12 hours for the model to spinup properly.