ATL: Tropical Depression Fay

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
carversteve
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:40 am

Re:

#1661 Postby carversteve » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:14 pm

KWT wrote:not sure what you are getting at to be honest OURAGAN?

IMO 92L still has a fair chance of developing, needs another 24hrs yet before it has any chance of getting going, also need to miss the islands to the north, still not a forgone conclusion.

I'm just glad you understood what he was saying!!
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1662 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:14 pm

vacanechaser wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
KWT wrote:Convection once again has fired over the center, its very interesting to watch flare up and flare down again, I still think we aren't quite ready for to go ahead and develop just yet and may still take another 12-24hrs but upper conditions look far better now with that upper ridge forming.

Track should remain a little south of WNW now IMO, going to come fairly close to the Ne Caribbean Islands IMO.


well lets not start calling it the center :) and lets just say convection has fired up again. cause no center yet. now hopefully either two things happen

1. a center develops and we get something going
2. its stops being annoying and just dies

either one sounds ok to me right about now.. :)


looks like a closed low at the surface in the visables in the past few hours... maybe it is starting to get its act together a little bit... i know the convection is on the downturn again, but you can see what looks like a closed low at the surface..

Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team


I've been watching it waiting to mention anything till i see something more definate. i can see some clearly more defined inflow on the south side and a little more curved could line towards the nw and west that looks like they are trying to be pulled in. but the weak (mean) area that everything appers to be rotating around is just that very very weak and very little convergence in that area. so look for a center to develope where ever convection fires and persits.


*edited by sg to put vacanechaser's comments back inside the quote box - 1:24pm cdt
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1663 Postby KWT » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:17 pm

wxman57, it looked total ok yesterday until it totally decayed but think it all depends where you think the center is...

Also thats IF your center is right, I can't see anythign there to be honest and if there is its pretty pathetic and will die very rapidly if anything develops in that convection to the east.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1664 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:19 pm

wxman57 wrote:Here's a 17Z surface plot with satellite. I indicated where the lowest pressure is with the "L". There doesn't seem to be much of any circulation at the surface - maybe very, very weak. And I don't see any "increasing inflow" as some have mentioned. It's just a weak area of low pressure with a small area of convection off to the east right now. It looked A LOT better yesterday than it does today. That's not to say it won't develop at all, but it's not developing today.

Image


you beat me to the image :) that is what i was about to post.. i do agree except the over all appearace today is better in respect to the shape of the apparent circualtion... yesterday it was quite elongated. as i mentioned just a min ago the is a very weak low ( as did you ). you have to agree that from yesterday inflow is somewhat more definable at the least. it may not be anything to get excited about but it is what it is and time will tell .
0 likes   

gtsmith
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 7:05 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1665 Postby gtsmith » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:19 pm

txag2005 wrote:Do most invests normally take this long to develop or die off? It gets a bit frustrating to not know what is going to happen.


2006 season was very much like this...does it develop...next 24 hours will tell...24 hours later...is it going to develop? next 24 hours will tell...etc. etc. etc. it was like that all season IIRC...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1666 Postby KWT » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:22 pm

If there is a circulation there its very ill defined IMO looking at the loops and I think one big burst in the convection and any center that may be further west will snuff it:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/sloop-vis.html
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22984
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#1667 Postby wxman57 » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:24 pm

KWT wrote:wxman57, it looked total ok yesterday until it totally decayed but think it all depends where you think the center is...

Also thats IF your center is right, I can't see anythign there to be honest and if there is its pretty pathetic and will die very rapidly if anything develops in that convection to the east.


There's no doubt I've identified the area of lowest pressure on that image. There are even surface obs around it to confirm that. Definitely higher pressure and nothing at the surface near the convection. It's a weak, exposed area of low pressure with an isolated burst of convection 150 miles to the east.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1668 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:24 pm

KWT wrote:If there is a circulation there its very ill defined IMO looking at the loops and I think one big burst in the convection and any center that may be further west will snuff it:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/sloop-vis.html


well of course.. that area is weak and what ever persistant convection that forms will likely be the place for a low to form..
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#1669 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:24 pm

I agree with wxman57's center. That is what I have been seeing all day long. I don't know if I agree so much with the inflow not getting better though. To me, it does look to be a bit more defined on today's satellite loops. The center also looks less elongated.
Last edited by Extremeweatherguy on Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1670 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:25 pm

have to disagree about not having more inflow

there is more inflow to the east of the low

that's not the best for development, however
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145629
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1671 Postby cycloneye » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:26 pm

The 18:00 UTC Best Track Position:

AL, 92, 2008081318, , BEST, 0, 165N, 583W, 25, 1009, DB, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1012, 220, 80,

ftp://ftp.tpc.ncep.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/


Moving 280 degrees west.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#1672 Postby KWT » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:27 pm

wxman57 wrote:
There's no doubt I've identified the area of lowest pressure on that image. There are even surface obs around it to confirm that. Definitely higher pressure and nothing at the surface near the convection. It's a weak, exposed area of low pressure with an isolated burst of convection 150 miles to the east.


Yep fair enough, area of lowest pressure doesn't mean LLC I suppose, just saying I ccan't see nothing on loops to suggest a circulation there at all...but i'll grant it I'm far from a pro!

Edit---best track agrees as well with you, fair enough you win hehe!

EDIt 2---Still I Don't agree with you aobut yesterday, it looked real cruddy and only had a MLC, no LLC at all, least this may have a weak weak LLC now...
Last edited by KWT on Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:31 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4824
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1673 Postby ronjon » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:28 pm

Interesting discussion from HPC this afternoon:

TROPICAL INVEST 92L MAY AFFECT FL LATE WEEKEND AND EARLY NEXT
WEEK. GENERALIZED TRACK AND TPC/HPC COODINTAION CONSENSUS CARRIES IT THRU SRN AND CENTRAL FL. INTENSITY FORECASTS VARY GREATLY FROM AN ILL DEFINED WEAK WAVE TO POSSIBLE HURRICANE. STRONGEST DYNAMICAL MODEL SOLUTIONS 00Z ECMWF/CMC AND 12Z NAM. SEE TPC DISCUSSIONS/ADVISORIES.

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/basicwx/day0-7loop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
alienstorm
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:29 pm
Location: Miami Fla western suburb

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1674 Postby alienstorm » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:31 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Here's a 17Z surface plot with satellite. I indicated where the lowest pressure is with the "L". There doesn't seem to be much of any circulation at the surface - maybe very, very weak. And I don't see any "increasing inflow" as some have mentioned. It's just a weak area of low pressure with a small area of convection off to the east right now. It looked A LOT better yesterday than it does today. That's not to say it won't develop at all, but it's not developing today.

Image


you beat me to the image :) that is what i was about to post.. i do agree except the over all appearace today is better in respect to the shape of the apparent circualtion... yesterday it was quite elongated. as i mentioned just a min ago the is a very weak low ( as did you ). you have to agree that from yesterday inflow is somewhat more definable at the least. it may not be anything to get excited about but it is what it is and time will tell .


If this is the center than this is very much done, dead.. There is strong southerly shear and no inflow what so ever.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23692
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1675 Postby gatorcane » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:34 pm

ronjon wrote:Interesting discussion from HPC this afternoon:

TROPICAL INVEST 92L MAY AFFECT FL LATE WEEKEND AND EARLY NEXT
WEEK. GENERALIZED TRACK AND TPC/HPC COODINTAION CONSENSUS CARRIES IT THRU SRN AND CENTRAL FL. INTENSITY FORECASTS VARY GREATLY FROM AN ILL DEFINED WEAK WAVE TO POSSIBLE HURRICANE. STRONGEST DYNAMICAL MODEL SOLUTIONS 00Z ECMWF/CMC AND 12Z NAM. SEE TPC DISCUSSIONS/ADVISORIES.

http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/basicwx/day0-7loop.html


Well as I have been forecasting peninsula FL (especially Southern FL) should have some kind of impact from 92L. Whether it passes by as an open wave or something else is the million dollar question. The synoptic pattern is setting up for a possible hurricane impacting Southern FL from the East, if 92L can get going it will have everything it needs to develop into something as it heads generally WNW.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1676 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:35 pm

alienstorm wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Here's a 17Z surface plot with satellite. I indicated where the lowest pressure is with the "L". There doesn't seem to be much of any circulation at the surface - maybe very, very weak. And I don't see any "increasing inflow" as some have mentioned. It's just a weak area of low pressure with a small area of convection off to the east right now. It looked A LOT better yesterday than it does today. That's not to say it won't develop at all, but it's not developing today.

Image


you beat me to the image :) that is what i was about to post.. i do agree except the over all appearace today is better in respect to the shape of the apparent circualtion... yesterday it was quite elongated. as i mentioned just a min ago the is a very weak low ( as did you ). you have to agree that from yesterday inflow is somewhat more definable at the least. it may not be anything to get excited about but it is what it is and time will tell .


If this is the center than this is very much done, dead.. There is strong southerly shear and no inflow what so ever.


we have to watch out that we dont call it a "center" as that would be inaccurate. and area on low pressure is more correct. also that is the "mean" area that one would conclude after extrapolating a "mean" center/low pressure area from what ever curved bands that are present to do so...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1677 Postby KWT » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:37 pm

Its an area of lower pressure, I highly doubt its even close to being closed so even a low pressure wouldn't be right, maybe just a fairly sharp trough would be a better terminology for it.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Central Atlantic

#1678 Postby cheezyWXguy » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:39 pm

alienstorm wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Here's a 17Z surface plot with satellite. I indicated where the lowest pressure is with the "L". There doesn't seem to be much of any circulation at the surface - maybe very, very weak. And I don't see any "increasing inflow" as some have mentioned. It's just a weak area of low pressure with a small area of convection off to the east right now. It looked A LOT better yesterday than it does today. That's not to say it won't develop at all, but it's not developing today.

Image


you beat me to the image :) that is what i was about to post.. i do agree except the over all appearace today is better in respect to the shape of the apparent circualtion... yesterday it was quite elongated. as i mentioned just a min ago the is a very weak low ( as did you ). you have to agree that from yesterday inflow is somewhat more definable at the least. it may not be anything to get excited about but it is what it is and time will tell .


If this is the center than this is very much done, dead.. There is strong southerly shear and no inflow what so ever.

Yep. Done. This is gone in the next 5 minutes and there will never be another tropical storm ever again.

Why dont you eat those words tomorrow. Personally, I think this will organize a bit tomorrow, as conditions should really start to improve...but really all it has to do is exist tomorrow in order for you to eat your words.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1679 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:40 pm

KWT wrote:Its an area of lower pressure, I highly doubt its even close to being closed so even a low pressure wouldn't be right, maybe just a fairly sharp trough would be a better terminology for it.


lows dont have to be closed! there can be an area of low pressure without a closed circulation..
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#1680 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:41 pm

alienstorm - What do you mean "No inflow what so ever"? I see plenty of inflow into that area.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests