H Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#181 Postby RL3AO » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:00 pm

sealbach wrote:i knew the reading was at 500 ft, but i didn't think the difference would be as much as 18 mb


The actual air pressure in places like Denver is around 850mb or so.
0 likes   

sealbach
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:25 pm
Location: Houston, Tx

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#182 Postby sealbach » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:08 pm

even for Denver that's low
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#183 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:18 pm

sealbach wrote:even for Denver that's low


Not really. Standard pressure for 5,000ft MSL is 850mb. Matter of fact, Denver's current SLP is 1010.8mb, but their station pressure is actually 835mb.
0 likes   

sealbach
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:25 pm
Location: Houston, Tx

#184 Postby sealbach » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:24 pm

i guess i don't understand the difference between the 850 reading and the 1010 becuse when I check the weather there the reading shows 1010mb
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#185 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:28 pm

sealbach wrote:i guess i don't understand the difference between the 850 reading and the 1010 becuse when I check the weather there the reading shows 1010mb


The 1010 hPa is nothing more than a calculated adjustment for sea-level pressure.

835 hPa is the true reading, but is rarely publicly reported. SLP is reported to give all locations an equal playing field. (It allows for highs and lows to be determined).

Matter of fact, it would be practically impossible for the station pressure in Denver to be 1010 hPa. That would yield a SLP reading of over 35 in/mg. (Highest ever recorded was 32.01")
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#186 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:32 pm

Based on how this was looking this morning, I was expecting more from recon than what is actually there. The 30-ish knot winds were at altitude and far from the center.


I was pretty sure this would be upgraded a few hours ago. Now I'd say less than 50/50 this is called a depression.


Maybe tomorrow.

Bad for Central America, good for Texas. The later it organizes, the less chance it has to come up into our part of the world.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#187 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:37 pm

sealbach wrote:i guess i don't understand the difference between the 850 reading and the 1010 becuse when I check the weather there the reading shows 1010mb


Here's a calculator I found that will convert adjusted SLP to actual station pressure.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/stationpressurecalc.html
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#188 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:44 pm

Recon has no West winds of note, and they are close to the coast. Looking at NW Venezuelan coast and Eastern Colombian coast, along with Curacoa and Bonaire, most have Easterly or Southeasterly winds, I forget whether it was Coro or Maracaibo that was calm.


Just on that, 94L was better organized yesterday, when it was a loose area of low pressure with a broad but closed low. Now it is apparently just a sharp and convectively active wave.
0 likes   

sealbach
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:25 pm
Location: Houston, Tx

#189 Postby sealbach » Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:48 pm

thanks for the explanation and link
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#190 Postby Frank2 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:19 pm

Ed,

Now it is apparently just a sharp and convectively active wave.


Si - that's what it seemed to look like earlier...

Looks like another red herring...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145285
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#191 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:35 pm

In summary,did they found any west winds at all?
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#192 Postby Stratosphere747 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:36 pm

That was a rather quick mission...
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#193 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:36 pm

cycloneye wrote:In summary,did they found any west winds at all?


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#194 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:38 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:That was a rather quick mission...


No point in wasting fuel and manpower looking for something that isn't there, I suppose...
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#195 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:41 pm

Recon found nothing, but based on the satellite appearance around 9 am this morning, I think not cancelling the plane was a good call. Better to send a plane and find no closed low, then not send a plane into a 40 knot storm and be a day behind the curve on forecasts.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re: Invest 94L Recon Discussion Thread

#196 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:45 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:Recon found nothing, but based on the satellite appearance around 9 am this morning, I think not cancelling the plane was a good call. Better to send a plane and find no closed low, then not send a plane into a 40 knot storm and be a day behind the curve on forecasts.


I fully agree. If I was in there shoes, I don't see myself doing anything differently.
0 likes   

User avatar
sgastorm
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 66
Age: 57
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Valdosta, GA

#197 Postby sgastorm » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:04 pm

I'm wondering if the aircraft had a problem and they had to leave early. Recon was scheduled to be in the area until 2030Z.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#198 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:17 pm

sgastorm wrote:I'm wondering if the aircraft had a problem and they had to leave early. Recon was scheduled to be in the area until 2030Z.


I doubt it. Judging from the track, they probably got all they need to know--it's an open wave.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#199 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:20 pm

recon was valuable today

it showed that the low has dissipated when satellite was indicating that it had become better organized
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#200 Postby CrazyC83 » Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:07 pm

I agree, this is certainly not a tropical cyclone by any means. IMO, 96L has a far better chance of developing.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests