ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Skyhawk
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 7:50 am
Location: Morgantown, WV

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1941 Postby Skyhawk » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:40 pm

Last area investigated by recon for a center was around 12.6 N 60.0 W. Strong convection developing nearby.
0 likes   

weatherguru18

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1942 Postby weatherguru18 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:43 pm

I'm pretty sure the "it's dead, jim" thing is pretty old. Nobody cares really. No offense to anybody, but it's annoying that people jump on and off the development train. Make a decision and stick with it. I've said this thing is going to develop for days. Has it? No. But I'm holding out. It ain't over til' it's over. I garuntee you this is going to fire up again tonight and then everybody and their brother is going to be trying to convince everybody else why for sure this is going to develop. Just my two cents. It doesn't mean much.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1943 Postby RL3AO » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:43 pm

Skyhawk wrote:Last area investigated by recon for a center was around 12.6 N 60.0 W. Strong convection developing nearby.


Yep.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1944 Postby KWT » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:49 pm

Yep a little region of convection has gone up near 60W, will be interesting if that area can expand and hold over the next 9hrs for recons next mission. Problem is every time its had a convective burst the convection has waned and redeveloped further west of the center thanks to the shear.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1945 Postby canegrl04 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:54 pm

Wouldn't it be ironic if this pitiful looking thing for days winds up turning into a hurricane :eek:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1946 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:55 pm

they may not investigate tonight

typically, low levle invests are NOT conducted at night
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1947 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:55 pm

its happened before.
Remember Claudette?
Its those tenacious little fighters that scare me the most.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5902
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1948 Postby MGC » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:56 pm

94L is one rollercoaster of a disturbance. Looks good then looks bad only to start looking good again. I still don't have a clue if it will be upgraded or not. 94L is one of those fence-sitters that could go either way. We usually get one like this every so often. My bets are that it will finally get its act together south of Jamacia.......MGC
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#1949 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:03 pm

This is one fighting system. Convection actually lasted throughout today and now that it's entering the D-MAX, convection will probably continue to increase. But it's only has a matter of time before it enters an area of unfavorable wind shear.
0 likes   

User avatar
AnnularCane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2868
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:18 am
Location: Wytheville, VA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Eastern Caribbean

#1950 Postby AnnularCane » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:06 pm

It's starting to look sheared already.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Eastern Caribbean

#1951 Postby MiamiensisWx » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:07 pm

The system is facing strong upper level shear from an upper low to the north:

http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/trop_ge_wv_ls_0.html

It has been clearly sheared throughout the day. It isn't encountering the shear now; it has been suffering from it over the past few days.

The southern Caribbean system holds more potential for development than 94L, the latter of which will not develop, in my view.
Last edited by MiamiensisWx on Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Innotech
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L in Eastern Caribbean

#1952 Postby Innotech » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:14 pm

thats why Im a bit concerned about it. It has managed to stay alive through all of this.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1953 Postby fci » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:18 pm

weatherguru18 wrote:I'm pretty sure the "it's dead, jim" thing is pretty old. Nobody cares really. No offense to anybody, but it's annoying that people jump on and off the development train. Make a decision and stick with it. I've said this thing is going to develop for days. Has it? No. But I'm holding out. It ain't over til' it's over. I garuntee you this is going to fire up again tonight and then everybody and their brother is going to be trying to convince everybody else why for sure this is going to develop. Just my two cents. It doesn't mean much.


The ups and downs of a system and projecting whether it will develop of not is part of the fun of following the tropics. Taking a stand one way or the other and standing firm for the sake of "continuity" is kind of just being stubborn in my opinion.
Some of the Pro Mets have "waffled" on the development of 94L which is totally natural.
As conditions change, ones views change.
At the time a Pro Met makes a "yes" or "no" statement on a system it is based on their professional opinion taking into consideration all of the factors (many of which asre WAY over my head since I am just an amateur). So they are truly not "waffling" they are voicing their interpretation of what they are seeing and it can change anytime based on the things that they professionally consider.

This is all dynamic and never static so naturally viewpoints will change.

Your "garuntee" can't be a guarantee since you don't know. It is your best guess and I welcome hearing it but there are no guarantees!
Nobody knows since this is Mother Nature we are talking about here and there are no absolutes.
And, in my opinion, that is the BEAUTY of the whole thing.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#1954 Postby southerngale » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:20 pm

Excellent post, fci.
0 likes   

weatherguru18

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L=Special Statement=No TD at this time

#1955 Postby weatherguru18 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:24 pm

fci wrote:
weatherguru18 wrote:I'm pretty sure the "it's dead, jim" thing is pretty old. Nobody cares really. No offense to anybody, but it's annoying that people jump on and off the development train. Make a decision and stick with it. I've said this thing is going to develop for days. Has it? No. But I'm holding out. It ain't over til' it's over. I garuntee you this is going to fire up again tonight and then everybody and their brother is going to be trying to convince everybody else why for sure this is going to develop. Just my two cents. It doesn't mean much.


The ups and downs of a system and projecting whether it will develop of not is part of the fun of following the tropics. Taking a stand one way or the other and standing firm for the sake of "continuity" is kind of just being stubborn in my opinion.
Some of the Pro Mets have "waffled" on the development of 94L which is totally natural.
As conditions change, ones views change.
At the time a Pro Met makes a "yes" or "no" statement on a system it is based on their professional opinion taking into consideration all of the factors (many of which asre WAY over my head since I am just an amateur). So they are truly not "waffling" they are voicing their interpretation of what they are seeing and it can change anytime based on the things that they professionally consider.

This is all dynamic and never static so naturally viewpoints will change.

Your "garuntee" can't be a guarantee since you don't know. It is your best guess and I welcome hearing it but there are no guarantees!
Nobody knows since this is Mother Nature we are talking about here and there are no absolutes.
And, in my opinion, that is the BEAUTY of the whole thing.



Fair enough. However, I'm smarter than the average amature. I'll be graduating next year in meteorology. My "guarantee" is not what it sounded like. I was just trying to make a point that if it fires up again, everybody all of a sudden is going to change their toon.

And now that I've thought about it, anybody can look or sound smart and "nail development" when one keeps flip flopping. You wanna flip flop...fine. But don't type paragraphs as to why something will or will not develop only to change your mind with the next satellite image. That's all.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1956 Postby brunota2003 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:26 pm

Perhaps some of those who are insulting the Pro Mets need to read this rule:

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act professionally at all times.



As far as 94L goes, interesting that they are flying into it tonight, versus waiting until tomorrow during the day. How close it is to land the main factor there?
0 likes   

weatherguru18

Re:

#1957 Postby weatherguru18 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:29 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Perhaps some of those who are insulting the Pro Mets need to read this rule:

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act professionally at all times.



As far as 94L goes, interesting that they are flying into it tonight, versus waiting until tomorrow during the day. How close it is to land the main factor there?


Not sure what your post was for because nobody was insulted. Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
mf_dolphin
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 17758
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Contact:

#1958 Postby mf_dolphin » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:29 pm

We're taking care of the obvious trolls folks. :-) Hang in there with us because this happens every year.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#1959 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:29 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Perhaps some of those who are insulting the Pro Mets need to read this rule:

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act professionally at all times.



As far as 94L goes, interesting that they are flying into it tonight, versus waiting until tomorrow during the day. How close it is to land the main factor there?


...and before that spawns another feverish thread hijacking...

Back to 94L.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145698
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#1960 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:30 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Perhaps some of those who are insulting the Pro Mets need to read this rule:

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act professionally at all times.



As far as 94L goes, interesting that they are flying into it tonight, versus waiting until tomorrow during the day. How close it is to land the main factor there?


Dont worrie as the house is being cleaned. :wink:

Back to topic.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest