ATL: Tropical Depression Fay

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
hurricanefloyd5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1659
Age: 44
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
Location: Spartanburg
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3661 Postby hurricanefloyd5 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:03 am

I am looking at the 92L system on tv and I might be seeing things but is a MLC forming well north of the Islands? It looked like it on the last few frames!!!!!!!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3662 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:04 am

By the way, the possibility does still exist for a major hurricane once this leaves the DR (which I will eat crow for :cheesy: ). Both GFDL and HWRF bring it to winds in excess of 150mph, hwrf briefly reaching cat5. In addition, the usually conservative euro brings it into the carolinas at the equivalent of a major hurricane, i believe, and the last ships i saw (last night) brings the storm to 105mph, after crossing DR. Basically, It sounds to me like the stronger the weakness, the stronger it will get.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#3663 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:05 am

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
gatorcane wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:I will say one thing...

if this does not develop, GFDL and HWRF just made my red card list


LOL mine too.


LOL..But you said it last night Ortt..Neither of them develop this till E Cuba..


I meant in the unlikely event that it gets buried
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#3664 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:05 am

HURAKAN wrote:It's funny to see that people are still making predictions after how wrong we have been with 92L. The tropics are a lot of fun. :lol: :lol: :lol:

92L behaves like the phrase says "expect the unexpected."

right .. this things as baffled more times that any other system i can recall..

and ortt .. there is a much more well defined center ( than last night and yesterday) just north of the mona passage. Sat and radar is fairly straight forward on a broad center ...i can clearly see much imporved low level banding.. i agree its not well defined and ealier this morning i was hard pressed to verify that but as the morning prgresses and more visible came in it was becoming quite evidenet.
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3665 Postby Normandy » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:06 am

And for those that don't believe islands can disrupt a storms inflow, just look at the PR radar loop...You can see most of the precipitation is confined to areas south of the island, and the northern coast is completely dry....that is an indication that the storm's southern inflow is already being hindered.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3666 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:06 am

Well if it takes the northerly option of the GFDL then it may well still have a chance of doing something impressive but there are two issues:

1: its too strong at the start of the run
2: looks like its a touch too far north, meaning in truth it'll spend more time overland.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re:

#3667 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:06 am

MiamiensisWx wrote:Check the SJU radar loop. If you utilize your mouse cursor and plot the movement of the LLC (evident off NW Puerto Rico per QuikSCAT) on the radar, you can clearly detect the fact that the movement is north of due west. If you extrapolate the movement from the LLC's current position in the Mona Passage, it would imply a brief landfall on the extreme eastern edge of Hispaniola, but it would mostly scrape the eastern coastline.

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=JUA...11&loop=yes

Does anyone concur? I'm sticking with my original "scrape" call.

Regardless, this will be a significant heavy precip event for Hispaniola, unfortunately.


except for one major problem

radar echos are moving to the east to the south of your position
0 likes   

GreenSky
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: Land of Alex Jones!-Austin,TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3668 Postby GreenSky » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:07 am

cheezyWXguy wrote:By the way, the possibility does still exist for a major hurricane once this leaves the DR (which I will eat crow for :cheesy: ). Both GFDL and HWRF bring it to winds in excess of 150mph, hwrf briefly reaching cat5. In addition, the usually conservative euro brings it into the carolinas at the equivalent of a major hurricane, i believe, and the last ships i saw (last night) brings the storm to 105mph, after crossing DR. Basically, It sounds to me like the stronger the weakness, the stronger it will get.


Yeah, because a strong weakness will move it longer over the Gulf Stream waters. However, Jeff Masters and other mets do not believe the weakness will be strong enough to pull 92L to the Carolinas...they are leaning more towards the 00Z GFS solution range
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#3669 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:07 am

lol. Yeah Derek, if this winds up never developing into anything, then I think some changes need to be made to the HWRF and GFDL. This would be a horrible bust on their part.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re:

#3670 Postby txwatcher91 » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:07 am

MiamiensisWx wrote:Check the SJU radar loop. If you utilize your mouse cursor and plot the movement of the LLC (evident off NW Puerto Rico per QuikSCAT) on the radar, you can clearly detect the fact that the movement is north of due west. If you extrapolate the movement from the LLC's current position in the Mona Passage, it would imply a brief landfall on the extreme eastern edge of Hispaniola, but it would mostly scrape the eastern coastline.

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?rid=JUA...11&loop=yes

Does anyone concur? I'm sticking with my original "scrape" call.

Regardless, this will be a significant heavy precip event for Hispaniola, unfortunately.



I see what you are talking about, IF that is the center I see then it shoudn't go over too much land, however, don't take what I say for granted as I am an amateur when it comes to looking for weak circulations on radar.
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3671 Postby UpTheCreek » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:07 am

Completely off topic, but why would Weather Underground be showing Invest 93L?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3672 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:08 am

UpTheCreek wrote:Completely off topic, but why would Weather Underground be showing Invest 93L?


Because it's back!
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3673 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:08 am

Normandy, yeah thats a good point actually, its noticeable though that the circulation survived pretty nicely overland and blew up as soon as it left the coast...however obviously DR is quite another matter esp if it does more then skim the coast but if the energy holds no reason why it can't do the same after it exits DR, blow up over the water, esp if it does so around Dmax.
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3674 Postby UpTheCreek » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:09 am

HURAKAN wrote:
UpTheCreek wrote:Completely off topic, but why would Weather Underground be showing Invest 93L?


Because it's back!


So it is! Thanks......
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#3675 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:09 am

Image
0 likes   

GreenSky
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: Land of Alex Jones!-Austin,TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L in Western Atlantic

#3676 Postby GreenSky » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:10 am

UpTheCreek wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:
UpTheCreek wrote:Completely off topic, but why would Weather Underground be showing Invest 93L?


Because it's back!


So it is! Thanks......


probably a fish in the making...not much to get worked up about
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re:

#3677 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:10 am

KWT wrote:Well if it takes the northerly option of the GFDL then it may well still have a chance of doing something impressive but there are two issues:

1: its too strong at the start of the run
2: looks like its a touch too far north, meaning in truth it'll spend more time overland.

Yeah, good point. I hate to say it though, but the near-term track may only be the difference between the gfdl's 153mph, and reality's 130mph. Im not saying it will go that high, but several reliable models suggest it has potential. In addition, conditions should be extremely favorable when this leaves land.
Last edited by cheezyWXguy on Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3678 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:11 am

a question that needs to be asked is will the vort max be over land before the aircraft is scheduled to fly. I think that it may and that recon may not investigate (dont want to be flying over mountainous land)
0 likes   

JPmia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re:

#3679 Postby JPmia » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:11 am

HURAKAN wrote:It's funny to see that people are still making predictions after how wrong we have been with 92L. The tropics are a lot of fun. :lol: :lol: :lol:

92L behaves like the phrase says "expect the unexpected."


I agree. If we have learned anything from the this thing it is that we really don't know what will happen next especially after it crosses northern hispanola and eastern cuba. I think Jeff Masters' write up is a good read.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#3680 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:12 am

Derek Ortt wrote:a question that needs to be asked is will the vort max be over land before the aircraft is scheduled to fly. I think that it may and that recon may not investigate (dont want to be flying over mountainous land)


NOAA leaves at 15Z.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests