ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Duddy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4041 Postby Duddy » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:50 am

bob rulz wrote:
I-wall wrote:I have a question for those of you who know more about this than I do:

Without waiting for the next advisory....does it still look like this is going just south of Galveston? I dont know how to check all the models so i'm hoping someone can help me out. Thanks!


Looks to me like GFDL has it at 140mph at Matagorda Bay and HWRF has 130mph at Corpus Christi. The links to both of these models are posted further up the page. Just keep watching this page (and search back a few pages) and all the model links should be posted.


That's like the end of the world here.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Nederland, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4042 Postby Nederlander » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:53 am

bob rulz wrote:Looks to me like GFDL has it at 140mph at Matagorda Bay and HWRF has 130mph at Corpus Christi. The links to both of these models are posted further up the page. Just keep watching this page (and search back a few pages) and all the model links should be posted.


GFDL isnt Matagorda Bay... its just SW of Galveston Bay near San Luis Pass....
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#4043 Postby dwg71 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:53 am

well i assume that the 48hr to 72hour positions are a recurve that passes through Central Texas coast.. Maybe south of Matagorda without a more hi res model, cant tell
0 likes   

Nexus
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:13 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4044 Postby Nexus » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:23 am

Nederlander wrote:
bob rulz wrote:Looks to me like GFDL has it at 140mph at Matagorda Bay and HWRF has 130mph at Corpus Christi. The links to both of these models are posted further up the page. Just keep watching this page (and search back a few pages) and all the model links should be posted.


GFDL isnt Matagorda Bay... its just SW of Galveston Bay near San Luis Pass....


Yes, and 3 runs in a row now with GFDL just SW of Galv.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4045 Postby Pebbles » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:48 am

I-wall wrote:I have a question for those of you who know more about this than I do:

Without waiting for the next advisory....does it still look like this is going just south of Galveston? I dont know how to check all the models so i'm hoping someone can help me out. Thanks!


I-wall, because your newer around here and don't know which of the people around here truely are well informed and who aren't... I really want to point out the Tropical Analysis portion of our forums. This is where our pro-mets and more proven amatures post their thoughts.

This is the area you really want to be reading for info. Unfortunately, the discussion and model threads can get comments flying from very novice weather hobbiests and would hate for you to get misinformation from less reliable sources. Plus they are just plain hard to keep up with sometimes.

I would also like to point out AirForceMet's posts... he has gone into great lengths to discuss what he thinks the models are and will do in the future.

viewforum.php?f=29
0 likes   

superfly
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 938
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:13 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4046 Postby superfly » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:11 am

Wx_Warrior wrote:Thoughts on the EURO? A west movement near corpus then goes due north left of Galveston...?


It's likely a curve with landfall near Matagorda...need someone with hi-res access to confirm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Duddy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:07 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4047 Postby Duddy » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:13 am

superfly wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:Thoughts on the EURO? A west movement near corpus then goes due north left of Galveston...?


It's likely a curve with landfall near Matagorda...need someone with hi-res access to confirm.


If you use your "hurricane curve eye", you can kinda see landfall near Matagorda.

I think.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1667
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4048 Postby bob rulz » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:42 am

Nederlander wrote:
bob rulz wrote:Looks to me like GFDL has it at 140mph at Matagorda Bay and HWRF has 130mph at Corpus Christi. The links to both of these models are posted further up the page. Just keep watching this page (and search back a few pages) and all the model links should be posted.


GFDL isnt Matagorda Bay... its just SW of Galveston Bay near San Luis Pass....


Haha, sorry, not too familiar with the geography of the area.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4933
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4049 Postby Nimbus » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:09 am

Recon is finding dropping pressures again this morning and the convection is expanding as can be seen after the satellite eclipse.

Water vapor loop shows a little light shear over the northwestern quadrant of the outflow but the way Ike is deepening it does not look like it will be a factor.

It is interesting that the NO GAPS was the rightmost model this morning with the GFDL still putting Galveston under the bad side of the storm.

Short of a big slowdown stall scenario the Houston/Galveston area really looks like they are going to get hurt. This is not looking like a situation where you can just ride it out, clean up the yard afterward and run your generator for a week till the power comes back.

Ike is pumping up his high pressure dome so shear should not be much of a factor soon. These big storms have been known to stall and move off in different directions but with the current ridging that small possibility would happen too late in the forecast to be much help. We are running out of time for the evacuation decisions.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#4050 Postby dwg71 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:37 am

nimbus pressure has been steady around 947 for a few hours..

dropped to 946 and most recent pass was 9473
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#4051 Postby dwg71 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:53 am

gfs has landfall between 48-54 hours at matagorda bay...

identical placement between 06z 54 hour and 00z 60hour.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#4052 Postby dwg71 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:19 am

ukmet 6z only goes out 48 hours but its enough for a matagorda bay landfall
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9787
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: South Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4053 Postby Portastorm » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:31 am

Anyone seen the 0z GFS run closely? It cuts off that low from the trough and the trough is not as deep coming through the Plains. Explains why the GFS thinks Ike stays more west-northwest through Texas.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4391
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#4054 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:33 am

06 GFDL shifts south to freeport area.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5566
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re:

#4055 Postby cheezyWXguy » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:34 am

dwg71 wrote:nimbus pressure has been steady around 947 for a few hours..

dropped to 946 and most recent pass was 9473

as to be expected during an erc..
0 likes   

Serenity
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:41 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4056 Postby Serenity » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:36 am

amateur question here with the models ... I understand everything about the tracking/forecasting with landfall (pressure, wind speed) but I was curious how can you tell the "size" of the storm. For instance, latest advisory suggests shrinking wind field but I can't see anything really evident in the models I've seen this morning.

TIA.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9787
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: South Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4057 Postby Portastorm » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:42 am

I may be a nutjob (my wife would probably agree) ... and I know I'm a rank amateur ... but I need to say it would not surprise me in the least to see the track forecasts shift left and further south as we get closer to landfall. I think the GFS is on to something with the trough splitting out west and perhaps the ridge of high pressure over Texas doesn't erode as much.

Just my two pesos ... :lol:
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re:

#4058 Postby dwg71 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:44 am

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:06 GFDL shifts south to freeport area.


more like palacious..
0 likes   

User avatar
A1A
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#4059 Postby A1A » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:45 am

Other than the NHC, I believe the more reliable players here are the GFDL, AVNO (GFI?), and the HWRF. At this point, what are the merits? The HWRF is sure an outlier at this point.

Image
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#4060 Postby dwg71 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:01 am

hwrf just south of matagorda bay and much weaker..73kts prior to landfall

dont we wish..
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests