should presistn 1KM loopTTheriot1975 wrote:can anyone post a loop for me to see the direction of ike
ATL: IKE Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
The Gulfstream IV jet did a very thorough sampling of the upper air data with a takeoff at 1:16 am and landing at 7:56 am from MacDill AFB. Most of this data will make it into the 12Z and 18Z model runs today.
0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
Sanibel wrote:You can see a secondary eyewall slit over Inagua if you look closely:
I actually dont think that what this is. What you are seeing is a new blowup of thunderstorms on the northwest side that is now starting to cover the very shallow convection, which was a result of a dry air intrusion. It may very well be the start of an erc, but it doesnt look like it to me.
0 likes
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:The latest at 9:55 AM EDT:
so much for going south of great iguna island . . .
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:48 pm
- Location: Florida, Kissimmee/St.CLoud
Re:
KWT wrote:I wonder whether the land interaction will be enough to weaken Ike to a cat-3. It was borderline last recon mission and that may make the difference.
Even a little weaknes could chang the track of a storm, but it will more than likely reintensify to Cat4, before Cuba if it does weaken
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22984
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re:
Vortex wrote:12Z NAM is even further north. In 18 hours a fair distance of the cuban coast.
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_018l.gif
NAM is about the worst model to use for hurricanes. I think even CLipper beats it.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 11:52 am
- Location: Boynton Beach, Fl
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
Doesn't Ike seem to be moving more West IMO he is not moving SW
0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
Hey WXMAN, hope you get a day one day..lol, but anyway, I know the nam is crap usually for tropical weather, but what about the synoptics over the conus?? I have found it too be not great, but not horrible either. NAM looks like its really trying to errode that ridge by hour 42 now.....
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7185
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 7185
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
gatorcane wrote:west movement commencing folks.
4 frames of west movement isnt enough to declare that gator, we need more
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:48 pm
- Location: Florida, Kissimmee/St.CLoud
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
If west movement commenced then this will be north of the 2nd Trop Fcst point, so the models could shift north
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 145604
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL IKE: Category 4 - Discussion
jlauderdal wrote:gatorcane wrote:west movement commencing folks.
4 frames of west movement isnt enough to declare that gator, we need more
More than 6 hours.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests