H Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33398
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#541 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:27 pm

This may be a case that the VDM does NOT come back in time for the 5 pm advisory - in which case it would likely be held as a tropical storm then upgraded to a hurricane in a special advisory around 5:30 pm.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#542 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:28 pm

In a normal storm, if you find 65 knots in the SW quadrant, you should expect about 75 knots in the NE quadrant.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#543 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:30 pm

Wel lsurface estimates show 65kts in the SW quadrant and its not flagged either it seems, therefore I suspect we are going to see higher winds in the NE quadrant probably enough to support hurricane, indeed it could be argued we have nough already with those surface estimates in the SW side.

Also yep pressure down to 985mbs, so still steadily deepening.
Last edited by KWT on Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

#544 Postby dixiebreeze » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:31 pm

22/1745 UTC 24.3N 94.9W T4.0/4.0 DOLLY
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

#545 Postby RL3AO » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:31 pm

dixiebreeze wrote:22/1745 UTC 24.3N 94.9W T4.0/4.0 DOLLY


Good timing.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33398
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#546 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:36 pm

71 kt FL winds found also support calling it a hurricane. 65 kt seems right.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#547 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:37 pm

71kt would probably round up at the surface to 65kts so I suspect they will probably upgrade given all the data from recon.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#548 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:38 pm

It is actually 63.9 knots at the surface, so assuming they'll use the "There is likely stronger winds that were not sampled." hypothesis, they very well might upgrade.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3644
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

#549 Postby drezee » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:39 pm

I am curious to why they did not fly through the center? That 71 kts would be from the N quad not NE...
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

#550 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:41 pm

They did fly through the center. They found a pressure of 985mb in the center which is a 3mb drop from the last center fix
0 likes   

Squarethecircle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2165
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Fairfax, VA

Re:

#551 Postby Squarethecircle » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:41 pm

brunota2003 wrote:It is actually 63.9 knots at the surface, so assuming they'll use the "There is likely stronger winds that were not sampled." hypothesis, they very well might upgrade.


It's so ridiculously close and so ridiculously within the realm of conversion error that the "excuse" is not necessary.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#552 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:43 pm

Squarethecircle wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:It is actually 63.9 knots at the surface, so assuming they'll use the "There is likely stronger winds that were not sampled." hypothesis, they very well might upgrade.


It's so ridiculously close and so ridiculously within the realm of conversion error that the "excuse" is not necessary.

Unless the reduction is closer to .85 (depends on the plane and flight level).
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#553 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:44 pm

Even if the reduction is 0.85 we've had a surface estimate of 65kts, that will probably be enough to warrent an upgrade.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#554 Postby Scorpion » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:45 pm

Theres a whole lot of 60+ winds this pass.. I think its safe to say we have a hurricane.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#555 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:45 pm

But that surface estimate came with flight level winds of also 65 knots...that would mean 100% reduction, if that were the case.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31391
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#556 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:48 pm

Doesn't really matter to be honest there was explosive convection there and the surface estimate was not flagged so no reason to doubt it to be honest?

Also yep there is a lot of 60kts at flight level on the last set of obs, probably expandin size of the TS size winds.
Last edited by KWT on Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#557 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:49 pm

why are we hung up on flight level winds when we have SFMR winds that are valid?
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 33
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#558 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:49 pm

Like that surface estimate of 71 knots unflagged with a flight level wind of 41 knots? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 43
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread

#559 Postby Thunder44 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:50 pm

VDM pressure 986mb.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#560 Postby txwatcher91 » Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:51 pm

SFC CNTR WITHIN 5NM OF FL CNTR

The earlier VDM had them 10nm apart, now only 5nm apart meaning it is becoming better stacked and that once they stack much quicker pressure falls are likely.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests