H Dolly Recon Discussion Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Wel lsurface estimates show 65kts in the SW quadrant and its not flagged either it seems, therefore I suspect we are going to see higher winds in the NE quadrant probably enough to support hurricane, indeed it could be argued we have nough already with those surface estimates in the SW side.
Also yep pressure down to 985mbs, so still steadily deepening.
Also yep pressure down to 985mbs, so still steadily deepening.
Last edited by KWT on Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread
dixiebreeze wrote:22/1745 UTC 24.3N 94.9W T4.0/4.0 DOLLY
Good timing.
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 33
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread
I am curious to why they did not fly through the center? That 71 kts would be from the N quad not NE...
0 likes
- Hurricanewatcher2007
- Category 2
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm
Re: TS Dolly Recon Discussion Thread
They did fly through the center. They found a pressure of 985mb in the center which is a 3mb drop from the last center fix
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: Fairfax, VA
Re:
brunota2003 wrote:It is actually 63.9 knots at the surface, so assuming they'll use the "There is likely stronger winds that were not sampled." hypothesis, they very well might upgrade.
It's so ridiculously close and so ridiculously within the realm of conversion error that the "excuse" is not necessary.
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 33
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Re: Re:
Squarethecircle wrote:brunota2003 wrote:It is actually 63.9 knots at the surface, so assuming they'll use the "There is likely stronger winds that were not sampled." hypothesis, they very well might upgrade.
It's so ridiculously close and so ridiculously within the realm of conversion error that the "excuse" is not necessary.
Unless the reduction is closer to .85 (depends on the plane and flight level).
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 33
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Doesn't really matter to be honest there was explosive convection there and the surface estimate was not flagged so no reason to doubt it to be honest?
Also yep there is a lot of 60kts at flight level on the last set of obs, probably expandin size of the TS size winds.
Also yep there is a lot of 60kts at flight level on the last set of obs, probably expandin size of the TS size winds.
Last edited by KWT on Tue Jul 22, 2008 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 33
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests