ATL: Tropical Depression Dolly

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#561 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:42 am

The lack of convergence is probably why the convection decayed overnight, I wonder why its decreased like that though?!
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re:

#562 Postby Thunder44 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:48 am

KWT wrote:The lack of convergence is probably why the convection decayed overnight, I wonder why its decreased like that though?!


Because the whole system is probably weakening. Needs to be starting show more signs of organization today, or I'm going with the models not developing this system again.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re:

#563 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:49 am

KWT wrote:The lack of convergence is probably why the convection decayed overnight, I wonder why its decreased like that though?!


It just makes you think about how many factors come together to create a hurricane. Favorable SST, faorable Upper Level winds, moist environment, and low SAL are not the whole story.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#564 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:50 am

there might be too much ITCZ convection to the south, which is blocking the inflow
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#565 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:51 am

Maybe thunder though its stil lgot a clearly evident center and as long as thats still spinning then eventually its surely going to find the right conditions that it needs again, as we learnt with Bertha as soon as something go down they can come straight back up, but we will have to see with this one won't we!

Derek, interesting so as it pulls away from the ITCZ slowly but surely it may find better conditions to develop?
Last edited by KWT on Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re:

#566 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:51 am

KWT wrote:The lack of convergence is probably why the convection decayed overnight, I wonder why its decreased like that though?!


You answered your own question, no surface inflow or convergence=no fuel to keep convection refiring.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#567 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:53 am

Yep so if it can regain convergence then convection should refire again. Of course the longer that takes the weaker any circulation will steadily become I suppose.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re:

#568 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:54 am

KWT wrote:Maybe thunder though its stil lgot a clearly evident center and as long as thats still spinning then eventually its surely going to find the right conditions that it needs again, as we learnt with Bertha as soon as something go down they can come straight back up, but we will have to see with this one won't we!

Derek, interesting so as it pulls away from the ITCZ slowly but surely it may find better conditions to develop?


not really... no convergence to the north

should have remained farther south, where there was convergence
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#569 Postby boca » Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:59 am

I would have to say that looking at this on sat it still looks like it will become a depression within the next day or so.

http://metofis.rsmas.miami.edu/~dortt/s ... 1_loop.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#570 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:04 am

Interesting stuff Derek so chances for development have gone down then in that case, we will have to see if it can pop any decent convection in the next 24hrs otherwise it will be in trouble.
0 likes   

User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#571 Postby canegrl04 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:05 am

If it doesn't become a depression today,I guess that shows how unreliable the models can be to go from bullish to suddenly,'fugetaboutit"
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#572 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:06 am

surprisingly, the SSD T number went up to a 1.5 (not really sure how that happened)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#573 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:07 am

Certainly looks more impressive to me today than it did yesterday. Could be upgraded this afternoon, tomorrow at the latest.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#574 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:08 am

I still think I see a broad rotation center (what level, I don't know) near 12ºN, 41ºW, with heaviest showers still tied to the ITCZ.

In my unofficial and amaturish estimate, 50% sounds like a decent probability for development.

Looking at GFDL run, and 500 mb height progs from Canadian, GFS and Euro, I'd expect if this does form, a somewhat Charley 2004 like path (not saying intensity), with a turn North across Cuba, seems possible. No idea if the turn North if East or West or towards the Peninsula, but I'd say anyway from near Pensacola to Hatteras should keep a wary eye, along with residents of the Greater Antilles, and people in the Lesser Antilles, especially, should be planning preliminary actions, maybe stocking on things that will get scarce when official watches and warnings go up.

I remember how hard it was to find gas and bottled water when the warning for Rita went up.


Disclaimer: I think, as an amateur, I'm pretty good. Like the best left guard in a junior varsity football game. But I'd be crushed if I played in the NFL. So, take it with a grain. Unofficial, and positively not endorsed by Storm2K. And lets recall that Derek and WxMan57 are professional players, Derek the first round draft pick, WxMan57 the crafty veteran, like Strahan in his final season, except I doubt he is retiring. If they say I'm wrong, and bull rush towards the QB, odds are he is going to be sacked.


Please use your imagination, and pretend the disclaimer is sort of greenish and italicized.


Hmmmm, tags work on this thread. Derek's Q&A thread, not so well.

'amaturish' missing the letter 'e'.
Last edited by Ed Mahmoud on Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#575 Postby gatorcane » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:09 am

wxman57 wrote:Certainly looks more impressive to me today than it did yesterday. Could be upgraded this afternoon, tomorrow at the latest.


Indeed just because it doesn't have the deep reds on the IR, doesn't mean it is not getting better organized. I agree with this assessment.

Nice structure on the VIS also:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-vis.html
Last edited by gatorcane on Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#576 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:10 am

wxman57, what about the lack of any deep convection bar on the southern side near the ITCZ isn't that a problem?

Still I agree the structure has indeed tightened up recently just would like to see more convection over the center.

By the way the track is still WNW it seems around 285-290, its going to have to track further west then that if its going to take the Caribbean crusier route.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#577 Postby boca » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:11 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:I still think I see a broad rotation center (what level, I don't know) near 12ºN, 41ºW, with heaviest showers still tied to the ITCZ.

In my unofficial and amaturish estimate, 50% sounds like a decent probability for development.

Looking at GFDL run, and 500 mb height progs from Canadian, GFS and Euro, I'd expect if this does form, a somewhat Charley 2004 like path (not saying intensity), with a turn North across Cuba, seems possible. No idea if the turn North if East or West or towards the Peninsula, but I'd say anyway from near Pensacola to Hatteras should keep a wary eye, along with residents of the Greater Antilles, and people in the Lesser Antilles, especially, should be planning preliminary actions, maybe stocking on things that will get scarce when official watches and warnings go up.

I remember how hard it was to find gas and bottled water when the warning for Rita went up.


Disclaimer: I think, as an amateur, I'm pretty good. Like the best left guard in a junior varsity football game. But I'd be crushed if I played in the NFL. So, take it with a grain. Unofficial, and positively not endorsed by Storm2K. And lets recall that Derek and WxMan57 are professional players, Derek the first round draft pick, WxMan57 the crafty veteran, like Strahan in his final season, except I doubt he is retiring. If they say I'm wrong, and bull rush towards the QB, odds are he is going to be sacked.


Please use your imagination, and pretend the disclaimer is sort of greenish and italicized.


Hmmmm, tags work on this thread. Derek's Q&A thread, not so well.

'amaturish' missing the letter 'e'.


Ed do you see a trough coming in which would cause the turn around Cuba?
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#578 Postby wx247 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:11 am

Season cancel!!! Just kidding, just kidding...

Looks like we will be able to know a lot more in the next 12-24 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#579 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:13 am

KWT wrote:wxman57, what about the lack of any deep convection bar on the southern side near the ITCZ isn't that a problem?

Still I agree the structure has indeed tightened up recently just would like to see more convection over the center.

By the way the track is still WNW it seems around 285-290, its going to have to track further west then that if its going to take the Caribbean crusier route.


They don't develop instantly. First it had to separate from the ITCZ and develop an LLC, which it has. Now it needs to generate convection to enhance the inflow, which it probably will today. Actually, it looks better than I thought it would in such a short time.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L East of the Windward Islands

#580 Postby boca » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:14 am

Wxman57 do think think 94L will pull a dean and felix on us?
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests