ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
dolebot_Broward_NW
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:38 am

#6261 Postby dolebot_Broward_NW » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:40 am

What is the proper steering layer for Ike now that hes a CAT1?
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4823
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6262 Postby ronjon » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:43 am

On the steering winds, here is a classic example of a stronger storm getting pulled more poleward. I attached the 940-949 mb storm pressure steering - as you can see, the weakness or COL is more pronouned between the bubble high in the western GOM and the atlantic ridge east of FL. Go to the steering for a storm at less than 940 mb, and that weakness is even larger with steering generally toward the north. You can also see that that the currents are very light which will also cause Ike to slow down.

Current Steering 950mb-969mb
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm4.html

940-949 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm5.html

<940 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm6.html
Last edited by ronjon on Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

Re:

#6263 Postby O Town » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:44 am

dolebot_Broward_NW wrote:What is the proper steering layer for Ike now that hes a CAT1?


Check out the link below, it will tell you in the boxes up top which is best to use when.
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... oom=&time=
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10152
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6264 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:45 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:JB says near CRP, but he had Ike hitting NYC last week, and CRP just happens to be the biggest city between Tampico and Houston.


He could be right.


I think he has nailed every major Atlantic/Gulf city so far.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6265 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:46 am

Ed Mahmoud wrote:JB says near CRP, but he had Ike hitting NYC last week, and CRP just happens to be the biggest city between Tampico and Houston.


He could be right.


Well it seems pretty reasonable, I'll be a little surprised if Ike goes quite as far south as the GFS is expecting but its possible who knows. This is one of those set-ups where we really need Ike to hit somewhere with low population density because I've got a nasty feeling Ike is going to be a gulf beast.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tireman4
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5853
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Humble, Texas
Contact:

Re: Re:

#6266 Postby Tireman4 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:46 am

jasons wrote:
gboudx wrote:Jeff Lidner's Tuesday AM update.

viewtopic.php?f=29&t=103096


I encourage anyone on the TX coast to read this.

I agree with Jeff - and I still cannot shake Rita. I think the models have bottomed-out to the left and will now gradually shift right. This is what AFM laid out yesterday and I'm sticking to my guns for now.

Side note: wow, those pics are beautiful. If only we could visit there....



Again, I agree with you Jason. Everyone should pay attention to this. AFM called it. He stated that the models would trend northward after bottoming out.
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

Re: Re:

#6267 Postby O Town » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:48 am

O Town wrote:
dolebot_Broward_NW wrote:What is the proper steering layer for Ike now that hes a CAT1?


Check out the link below, it will tell you in the boxes up top which is best to use when.
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... oom=&time=

Except that is for Europe. LOL
Heres the link for the N. Atlantic.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... oom=&time=
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6268 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:49 am

Blown_away wrote:
Ed Mahmoud wrote:JB says near CRP, but he had Ike hitting NYC last week, and CRP just happens to be the biggest city between Tampico and Houston.


He could be right.


I think he has nailed every major Atlantic/Gulf city so far.


yep, after the fourth revision to the original
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6269 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:49 am

ronjon wrote:On the steering winds, here is a classic example of a stronger storm getting pulled more poleward. I attached the 940-949 mb storm pressure steering - as you can see, the weakness or COL is more pronouned between the bubble high in the western GOM and the atlantic ridge east of FL. Go to the steering for a storm at less than 940 mb, and that weakness is even larger with steering generally toward the north. You can also see that that the currents are very light which will also cause Ike to slow down.

Current Steering 950mb-969mb
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm4.html

940-949 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm5.html

<940 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm6.html


So in theory your saying if Cuba was not there to weaken him this would be haeaded to the N gulf coast?
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6270 Postby artist » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:50 am

ronjon wrote:On the steering winds, here is a classic example of a stronger storm getting pulled more poleward. I attached the 940-949 mb storm pressure steering - as you can see, the weakness or COL is more pronouned between the bubble high in the western GOM and the atlantic ridge east of FL. Go to the steering for a storm at less than 940 mb, and that weakness is even larger with steering generally toward the north. You can also see that that the currents are very light which will also cause Ike to slow down.

Current Steering 950mb-969mb
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm4.html

940-949 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm5.html

<940 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm6.html


with what I see here could this even be a Florida storm possibly and if not please show me or tell me how I can tell that. Thanks, just wanting to learn.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#6271 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:51 am

AFM said the NHC track would move south two more runs and then begin tracking north. Well, I would be surprised if the NHC bumped track a little more south for the fourth run in a row.

Models have not jumped north, sans a few outliers, but there are southern outliers as well.

24 hours from now, we should have a better idea of what we are dealing with.

On a side note, it appears the IKe could spend a few hours inland over Cuba, hopefully some weakening can occur.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6272 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:51 am

I think the best thing to do for those in Texas is to just watch what Ike does in the next 48hrs, that will go a long way into solving the issues, because that appears to be where the main difference is with many of the models.

Anyway much of the inner core now including the eye is over Cuba, I'd guess around 6hrs till its back in the gulf. I'm not expecting very rapid strengthening right away as it'll have to redjust its inner core again but when it does conditions looking good for this to be a major hurricane yet again...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#6273 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:52 am

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#6274 Postby jasons2k » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:53 am

One thing to notice with this trough coming in is that timing will be critical. That's laid-out in the HPC dicussion.

Now look at how fast the GFS pushes IKE across the Gulf. Anyone think Ike will landfall at 96 hours?
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6275 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:54 am

jlauderdal wrote:
deltadog03 wrote:COL dosn't mean cut off low...COL is an area btwn 2 highs....You can clearly see the weakness. Now, once this starts to strengthen it should pick up steam and head right towards that weakness...


we need to get this clear for the board, maybe afm was referring to something else, whats your definition of COL

The structure and evolution of an intense tropical cut-off low (COL)


I wasn''t referring to anything different. I accidentally took out one of the quotes. If you will go back and read my entire post...you will realize I was quoting you and then I answered. Problem is it didn't show yours in quotes.

A COL is a saddlepoint of weakness in the wind (or pressure) field b/w the ridges and lows.
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6276 Postby Nederlander » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:54 am

artist wrote:
ronjon wrote:On the steering winds, here is a classic example of a stronger storm getting pulled more poleward. I attached the 940-949 mb storm pressure steering - as you can see, the weakness or COL is more pronouned between the bubble high in the western GOM and the atlantic ridge east of FL. Go to the steering for a storm at less than 940 mb, and that weakness is even larger with steering generally toward the north. You can also see that that the currents are very light which will also cause Ike to slow down.

Current Steering 950mb-969mb
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm4.html

940-949 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm5.html

<940 mb steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8dlm6.html


with what I see here could this even be a Florida storm possibly and if not please show me or tell me how I can tell that. Thanks, just wanting to learn.


the weakness will be enough to pull Ike more NW in the short term, say the next 24-36 hours, and then the ridge is forecast to build back in forcing Ike West. The main question is the trof coming down from W Canada... timing is what its all about... any deviations in speed of either the trof or Ike could impact landfall... also another thing to look at is how far south that trof gets...
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#6277 Postby rockyman » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:55 am

NHC shifts to the right and slows down
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/at ... ml#a_topad
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#6278 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:55 am

dwg71 wrote:
On a side note, it appears the IKe could spend a few hours inland over Cuba, hopefully some weakening can occur.


Hopefully but I wouldn't get too hopeful for it to weaken much more then say down to 65kts given how short the trip will be. The inner core will weaken but given it survived a much longer trek with an outer eyewall as well suggests this little trek across land won't cause anything too drastic.

Hurakan, that is a really impressive presentation for a cat-1, I wouldn't be all that surprised if the NE quadrant has winds higher then 70kts.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#6279 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:56 am

dwg71 wrote:AFM said the NHC track would move south two more runs and then begin tracking north. Well, I would be surprised if the NHC bumped track a little more south for the fourth run in a row.

Models have not jumped north, sans a few outliers, but there are southern outliers as well.

24 hours from now, we should have a better idea of what we are dealing with.

On a side note, it appears the IKe could spend a few hours inland over Cuba, hopefully some weakening can occur.


Latest advisory has landfall 50 miles up the coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#6280 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:56 am

dwg71 wrote:AFM said the NHC track would move south two more runs and then begin tracking north. Well, I would be surprised if the NHC bumped track a little more south for the fourth run in a row.

Models have not jumped north, sans a few outliers, but there are southern outliers as well.

24 hours from now, we should have a better idea of what we are dealing with.

On a side note, it appears the IKe could spend a few hours inland over Cuba, hopefully some weakening can occur.



Of course I disagree with you.... :lol: like always :lol: .......The UKMET and the EURO have moved north overnight....we have discussed this before..You look for hints in the guidance and that hint is not STX and I will venture to NOT south of CC either. Matagorda looks like a good bet....


The GFS,GFDL,HWRF, all have followed the EURO (trend setter so far) no sound reasoning to discount this now.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests