#6739 Postby Texas Snowman » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:22 pm
Interesting response from NHC forecaster James Franklin to Houston Chronicle SciGuy Eric Berger about why the last advisory didn't shift the track even further north as some of the models have:
UPDATE: James Franklin was kind enough to respond to my query about why there wasn't a more northward shift:
Good question. Because models have a tendency to flip flop, and that is something we try very hard not to do with the official forecast. We'd rather move consistently and steadily in one direction, gradually honing in on the correct point, than windshield-wipering back and forth around it. Doing it this way we present a more consistent, and also in the long run more accurate message, even if we are occasionally slower to respond to changes. Given that we are still almost 4 days away from landfall, there is plenty of time to adjust the track farther north, if the current trend in the models turns out to be correct.
0 likes