inda_iwall wrote:If anything you just proved my point, that we always need to be on guard and open to possibilities, everyone gets so locked in on models and pro mets and maps, that sometimes things change and have their own minds when it comes to mother nature. I am in no way "BASHING", just questioning, I think sometimes scientists get so locked into analyzing data objectively, they lose sight that this is mother nature. Things can change, we can not predict everything. I am just striking back I guess because I am going against the mainstream thought, and I wanted to defend myself. I also think the dry air is going to inhibit RI, or any intensification past a cat 2, and I am sure you will slam me for that.
I have no problem coming back here and admitting I am wrong, I have been happily married for a while so doing that is nothing new to me in the least bit.
No no slamming for having a different thoughts from this quarter. And I apologize for coming down on you so hard... but my previous post wasn't purely directed at you but more so at several others who I've seen will sometimes flat out argue and slam those with higher education in the weather industry, while thinking they know more. I may have wrongly assumed that's what you were doing in hind sight, only because I've seen that getting to be a worse and worse problem.
Unfortunately, reading the intent of posts are sometimes difficult... BTW you don't have to 'defend yourself' just use data to explain WHY you think what you think in a constrictive manner. If you do this without bashing anyone else's forcasts and in a contructive matter, then you've every right to ignore anyone who tries bashing you (they shouldn't be... too much of that going on).
So you think dry air to the (I'm assuming to the west?) will inhibit RI and limit the storm to cat 2... we'll have to wait and how it plays out. ;P