RainWind wrote:What is "TINO"? Thanks! RW
Three
In
Name
Only
Moderator: S2k Moderators
ConvergenceZone wrote:This storm is looking worse and worse by the hour...The shear and dry air appear to be winning the war......Regardless of how low the winds may end up being upon landfall, this is still going to bring A LOT of rain, and probably flodding rains since it won't be moving that fast once it hits land.
Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
tolakram wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:If it's reorganizing, where is the eye in the below image, and that is the latest image. I don't see where it looks better to me......From looking at the previous images, the eye has always shows up on the visibles, but it's still not showing up on the AVN image below and the storm looks lopsided to me.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg
Those are older images, those loops update at a slower rate and sometimes the java loops don't refresh correctly. Besides, why use IR when we have visual.
ConvergenceZone wrote:If it's reorganizing, where is the eye in the below image, and that is the latest image. I don't see where it looks better to me......From looking at the previous images, the eye has always shows up on the visibles, but it's still not showing up on the AVN image below and the storm looks lopsided to me.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg
vaffie wrote:For those interested, I used the latest recon data to work out it's current trajectory (for the past 98 minutes):
I used 25'51''N, 86'33''W to 26'2''N, 86'54'' and used the FCC website to account for differences in heading dependent upon latitude to get a precise value of:
300.3 degrees at 21.9 knots.
Note that the heading for the previous six hours was an average of 315 degrees at 15 knots.
So it has sped up a little and for the past 1.5 hours has been heading on a more westerly track than prior.
Windy wrote:tolakram wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:If it's reorganizing, where is the eye in the below image, and that is the latest image. I don't see where it looks better to me......From looking at the previous images, the eye has always shows up on the visibles, but it's still not showing up on the AVN image below and the storm looks lopsided to me.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg
Those are older images, those loops update at a slower rate and sometimes the java loops don't refresh correctly. Besides, why use IR when we have visual.
I don't know about you, but I can tell a lot more from IR than a can from Visual, though vis tends to give information that IR can't, and visa versa.
Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
ConvergenceZone wrote:This storm is looking worse and worse by the hour...The shear and dry air appear to be winning the war......Regardless of how low the winds may end up being upon landfall, this is still going to bring A LOT of rain, and probably flodding rains since it won't be moving that fast once it hits land.
cpdaman wrote:Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that
1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)
HarlequinBoy wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:This storm is looking worse and worse by the hour...The shear and dry air appear to be winning the war......Regardless of how low the winds may end up being upon landfall, this is still going to bring A LOT of rain, and probably flodding rains since it won't be moving that fast once it hits land.
You are saying the exact opposite of some others? Who is right?
Derek Ortt wrote:cpdaman wrote:Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that
1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)
cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM
threes tend to remain steady
1s and 2s can intensity
cpdaman wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM
threes tend to remain steady
1s and 2s can intensity
dont want to deflect thread.....but then derek what did camile do (or was it just that much stronger prior to landfall)
Derek Ortt wrote:cpdaman wrote:Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that
1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)
cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM
threes tend to remain steady
1s and 2s can intensity
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests