ATL GUSTAV: Tropical Depression - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Derek Ortt

Re:

#8581 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:40 pm

RainWind wrote:What is "TINO"? Thanks! RW


Three
In
Name
Only
0 likes   

User avatar
HarlequinBoy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1400
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:57 am
Location: Memphis

Re:

#8582 Postby HarlequinBoy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:40 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:This storm is looking worse and worse by the hour...The shear and dry air appear to be winning the war......Regardless of how low the winds may end up being upon landfall, this is still going to bring A LOT of rain, and probably flodding rains since it won't be moving that fast once it hits land.


You are saying the exact opposite of some others? Who is right?
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

#8583 Postby Normandy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:41 pm

Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8584 Postby xironman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:42 pm

Gus is finally popping convection on the east side, just look at the storms blowing up on the northeast side of the eye. I have been watching this since 2am and if is the first time it has looked good
Image
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re:

#8585 Postby cpdaman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:42 pm

Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.


the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that

1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8586 Postby Windy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:43 pm

tolakram wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:If it's reorganizing, where is the eye in the below image, and that is the latest image. I don't see where it looks better to me......From looking at the previous images, the eye has always shows up on the visibles, but it's still not showing up on the AVN image below and the storm looks lopsided to me.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg


Those are older images, those loops update at a slower rate and sometimes the java loops don't refresh correctly. Besides, why use IR when we have visual.


I don't know about you, but I can tell a lot more from IR than a can from Visual, though vis tends to give information that IR can't, and visa versa.
0 likes   

soonertwister
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:52 pm

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8587 Postby soonertwister » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:44 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:If it's reorganizing, where is the eye in the below image, and that is the latest image. I don't see where it looks better to me......From looking at the previous images, the eye has always shows up on the visibles, but it's still not showing up on the AVN image below and the storm looks lopsided to me.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg


That image is almost an hour old. A lot has changed since then.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8588 Postby rtd2 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:44 pm

vaffie wrote:For those interested, I used the latest recon data to work out it's current trajectory (for the past 98 minutes):

I used 25'51''N, 86'33''W to 26'2''N, 86'54'' and used the FCC website to account for differences in heading dependent upon latitude to get a precise value of:

300.3 degrees at 21.9 knots.
Note that the heading for the previous six hours was an average of 315 degrees at 15 knots.

So it has sped up a little and for the past 1.5 hours has been heading on a more westerly track than prior.




Sped up a LITTLE? if those numbers were accurate it would push landfall WAY up....
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8589 Postby cpdaman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:44 pm

Windy wrote:
tolakram wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:If it's reorganizing, where is the eye in the below image, and that is the latest image. I don't see where it looks better to me......From looking at the previous images, the eye has always shows up on the visibles, but it's still not showing up on the AVN image below and the storm looks lopsided to me.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/avn-l.jpg


Those are older images, those loops update at a slower rate and sometimes the java loops don't refresh correctly. Besides, why use IR when we have visual.


I don't know about you, but I can tell a lot more from IR than a can from Visual, though vis tends to give information that IR can't, and visa versa.


ramdis visible is updated 25 minutes ahead of the IR of other sites, thus showing trends faster
0 likes   

superfly

Re:

#8590 Postby superfly » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:45 pm

Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.


It's not even close to landfall yet. In fact, it is still partly over northern edges of the loop current.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Re:

#8591 Postby Steve Cosby » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:45 pm

Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.


It hasn't gotten to the trash water yet. There was some research and studies in the past (I have no clue how to find them now) that the silt and other stuff in the water coming down from the Mississippi River caused the strength of the thunderstorms in a tropical storm to lower a notch.
0 likes   

User avatar
Mattie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: North Texas (formerly South Louisiana)
Contact:

Re:

#8592 Postby Mattie » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:46 pm

CrazyC83
Post subject:
New postPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:25 pm
Online
Category 5
Category 5

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Posts: 9983
Looks like Gustav is waking up on visible for the first time since Cuba.


ConvergenceZone wrote:This storm is looking worse and worse by the hour...The shear and dry air appear to be winning the war......Regardless of how low the winds may end up being upon landfall, this is still going to bring A LOT of rain, and probably flodding rains since it won't be moving that fast once it hits land.


two back to back posts . . . . well? which is it really?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re: Re:

#8593 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:46 pm

cpdaman wrote:
Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.


the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that

1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)


cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM

threes tend to remain steady

1s and 2s can intensity
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#8594 Postby KWT » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:46 pm

Eye starting to look a little squashed again as strong convection blows up in the N.Eyewall. Indeed looks like the eyewall is now totally closed again, so I think we should expect to see some modest strengthening again.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Re:

#8595 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:47 pm

HarlequinBoy wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:This storm is looking worse and worse by the hour...The shear and dry air appear to be winning the war......Regardless of how low the winds may end up being upon landfall, this is still going to bring A LOT of rain, and probably flodding rains since it won't be moving that fast once it hits land.


You are saying the exact opposite of some others? Who is right?



The next NHC update willl tell us who is right.... ;)
I have no problem being wrong....Once I see the eye pop out on the AVN, then I'll jump on the development bandwagon, but until then, will just wait for the next update by the NHC....
0 likes   

caneman

Re: Cat. 3 Hurricane Gustav in Gulf of Mexico

#8596 Postby caneman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:48 pm

Anyone know what the winds are here in the Tampa Bay area? Specifically along the beach of Pinellas County. Both peak wind gust and sustained. I'm surprised at how strong they've been.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: Re:

#8597 Postby cpdaman » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:48 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:
cpdaman wrote:
Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.


the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that

1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)


cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM

threes tend to remain steady

1s and 2s can intensity


dont want to deflect thread.....but then derek what did camile do (or was it just that much stronger prior to landfall)
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Re: Re:

#8598 Postby Steve Cosby » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:50 pm

cpdaman wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM

threes tend to remain steady

1s and 2s can intensity


dont want to deflect thread.....but then derek what did camile do (or was it just that much stronger prior to landfall)


He is speaking in generalities - there are ALWAYS exceptions (remember Fay? :wink: )
0 likes   

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#8599 Postby BigB0882 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:50 pm

Would someone mind educating me on this. I see people referring to direction of movement as 280, 300, 275, etc. I know 270-300 is in the WNW to NW but can someone tell me what number signifies W and what number signifies N so I can know what the inbetween numbers mean?
0 likes   

User avatar
Normandy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2293
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Re:

#8600 Postby Normandy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:51 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:
cpdaman wrote:
Normandy wrote:Well the one good thing that will come out of this: I believe the myth of "NGOM major canes must weaken prior to landfall" is going to be proven false by Gustav. Looking much better now.


the key to this (given similiar upper level conditons) is a path that

1. takes it over the loop current
2. is moving very fast (after exiting loop current thru landfall)


cat 4's and 5's weaken in the NGOM

threes tend to remain steady

1s and 2s can intensity



Maybe I am totally off base here, but I think the reason Category 5 hurricane tend to weaken is simply because this: They have to eventually! A cat5 can't be sustained for a long time, as inner core processes like ERC's tend to happen. Don't ERC's tend to allow more dry air to be sucked into the core? All NGOM hurricanes havn't collapsed at landfall...Frederick and Betsy are great examples. Humberto, if over water for 12 more hours, would have been a borderline 3/4. My point is that it is possible for an already severe hurricane (which Gustav is) to strike the NGOM while deepening/steady state.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests