ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Raider Power
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 45
Age: 60
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:20 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#9281 Postby Raider Power » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:53 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike is back to NW.

Currently moving WAY off Forecast points. Rita 2.0 indeed.


Not sure that I am seeing that, but I am most definitely a rank amateur at this stuff. I turned on one of the NHC loops and enabled Trop Pts and from my viewing of things, the storm seems to be right on schedule. Maybe because those images are not as up to date as ones you are viewing?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9282 Postby tolakram » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:53 pm

Image
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: Re:

#9283 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:55 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike is back to NW.

Currently moving WAY off Forecast points. Rita 2.0 indeed.



Not that much off. The good thing iid he's moving at a decent clip.
The quicker we get him inland the better for everyone.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-vis.html



What? You can't be serious..Stormcenter are you using your Tropical Forecast Points?

Ike is practically at the latitiude it SHOULD be at 00Z FRIDAY right now. Ike is VERY much off track.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9284 Postby PTrackerLA » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:55 pm

Yeah not feeling too comfortable about this NW movement. He sure is moving off the forecast points:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-vis.html

He also appears to be "pointing" towards the SE Texas coast now, a typical sign of expected movement.
0 likes   

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

#9285 Postby WxGuy1 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:55 pm

The current MPI (Maximum Potential Intensity) data indicate that conditions support Cat 4 winds (though few cyclones reach their MPI). So, I think the limiting reagant right now, so to say, is the rather odd structure of the storm. In addition, as othrs have noted, RECON just found 102 kt winds ~ 100 miles NE of the center of circulation. The 945-955 mb central pressure that Ike has had the past day would otherwise support stronger than the current-advisory 100 mph winds, but the structure of Ike is, for whatever reason, leading to a large area of weaker PGF, as opposed to a smaller area of strong PGF / winds that typically characterizes tropical cyclones. I don't recall too many storms that had stronger winds 100 miles from the center than it had near the center. If the double wind maxima structure can fix itself, then I foresee little reason why Ike's winds won't pick up to at least Cat 3 range. That said, I still think the surge will be the major danger with Ike. Jeff Master's made mention of some interesting things in his blog, any case anyone is interested.

Recon is now finding a slew of 95-102 kt FL winds in the NE quad. The winds aren't mixing down as well as they typically do for some reason, though. That's still a massive area of strong TS to Cat 1 winds. I fear the surge that Ike will bring, to say the least.
Last edited by WxGuy1 on Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#9286 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:56 pm

dhweather wrote:Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


The dry air to the west of Ike, combined with the high pressure over NE Mexico (providing modest shear) are prohibiting intensification.

Unless he gets one single core defined soon, he'll not make landfall stronger than he is now.

Given the very large windfield, there's going to be a lot of problems with flooding.


I can buy into that. I hope you are right.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: Re:

#9287 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:57 pm

Certainly within cone though...and with hurricane warnings to morgan city, la, doesn't seem like any area is 'under-warned' even if a bit more nw

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike is back to NW.

Currently moving WAY off Forecast points. Rita 2.0 indeed.



Not that much off. The good thing iid he's moving at a decent clip.
The quicker we get him inland the better for everyone.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-vis.html



What? You can't be serious..Stormcenter are you using your Tropical Forecast Points?

Ike is practically at the latitiude it SHOULD be at 00Z FRIDAY right now. Ike is VERY much off track.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

#9288 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:57 pm

Click tropical forecast points. Yikes. Hopefully that will even out. :flag: /obligatory 9/11
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9289 Postby tolakram » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:58 pm

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
micktooth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9290 Postby micktooth » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:59 pm

This happens every storm with the track. Let me guess:
People in LA and east "moving NW"
People in TX "moving WNW"
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9291 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:59 pm

tolakram wrote:New, 2 hours ago anyway.

Image


The inner eyewall is (basically) gone, the NW quad needs to close off now. If he can do that, he will strengthen.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#9292 Postby bob rulz » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:00 pm

I'm confused. I thought that the double wind maximum was finally sorting itself out and that the outer eyewall was becoming dominant, but people are still saying that we have problems with a double eyewall.

Which is it really here?
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#9293 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:00 pm

my thought is that for ike to really ramp up, the windfield must reduce some first...but could always expand later, but with a strong core to make matters worse

WxGuy1 wrote:The current MPI (Maximum Potential Intensity) data indicate that conditions support Cat 4 winds (though few cyclones reach their MPI). So, I think the limiting reagant right now, so to say, is the rather odd structure of the storm. In addition, as othrs have noted, RECON just found 102 kt winds ~ 100 miles NE of the center of circulation. The 945-955 mb central pressure that Ike has had the past day would otherwise support stronger than the current-advisory 100 mph winds, but the structure of Ike is, for whatever reason, leading to a large area of weaker PGF, as opposed to a smaller area of strong PGF / winds that typically characterizes tropical cyclones. I don't recall too many storms that had stronger winds 100 miles from the center than it had near the center. If the double wind maxima structure can fix itself, then I foresee little reason why Ike's winds won't pick up to at least Cat 3 range. That said, I still think the surge will be the major danger with Ike. Jeff Master's made mention of some interesting things in his blog, any case anyone is interested.
0 likes   

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

#9294 Postby Dave C » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:01 pm

The latest vis. shows a moat or dry area forming at about a 50 mile radius, the replacement cycle may be moving along now.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#9295 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:01 pm

He is right of the forecast, I believe it will level out though... Landfall may occur further up the coast but I doubt LA. Either way, LA is going to get hammered. If it manages to scoot East of Houston it won't be as bad as it could be (for Houston).
Last edited by HouTXmetro on Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9296 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:01 pm

micktooth wrote:This happens every storm with the track. Let me guess:
People in LA and east "moving NW"
People in TX "moving WNW"


Maybe so, I agree. But being too far East to see this storm at this point...i'd like to think my opinion is unbiased at this point. The storm is without question moving NW.
0 likes   

User avatar
Wthrman13
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 12:44 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

Re:

#9297 Postby Wthrman13 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:02 pm

bob rulz wrote:I'm confused. I thought that the double wind maximum was finally sorting itself out and that the outer eyewall was becoming dominant, but people are still saying that we have problems with a double eyewall.

Which is it really here?


Both are true.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#9298 Postby PTrackerLA » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:02 pm

Yes the warnings to Morgan city are warranted. There are now mandatory evacuations underway in Iberia parish south of hwy 90 and Vermilion south of hwy 14. Many of these areas flooded with Rita. I'm comforted that we're not taking any chances around here. It's fairly breezy in the city already with very "tropical" looking skies.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#9299 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:02 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:He is right of the forecast, I believe it will level out though... Landfall may occur further up the coast but I doubt LA. Either way, LA is going to get hammered. If it manages to scoot East of Houston it won't be as bad as it could be (for Houston).


Oh I agree he is right of the forecast but more then likely it will level out.
0 likes   

Stormavoider
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Spring Hill Fl.

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9300 Postby Stormavoider » Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:03 pm

micktooth wrote:This happens every storm with the track. Let me guess:
People in LA and east "moving NW"
People in TX "moving WNW"

It keeps the people in Colorado guessing
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests