ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9661 Postby Wx_Warrior » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:30 pm

Storm surge in Lake Charles (LA)? Keep getting people from LC asking me about this. LC is about 35 miles east of Orange.
0 likes   

User avatar
HarlequinBoy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1400
Age: 34
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:57 am
Location: Memphis

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9662 Postby HarlequinBoy » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:31 pm

Tireman4 wrote:Me neither. It will be a rough ride, but if you are prepared, have the essentials, and pick up things out of your yard, just ride it out.


Yeah, I just told her to buy what she'd need for possibly a few days without power.
0 likes   

User avatar
funster
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9663 Postby funster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:31 pm

tolakram wrote:
Wthrman13 wrote:What you are talking about is solid body rotation. A hurricane vortex *approximates* (key word here is approximate) what is known as a Rankine combined vortex. In this kind of vortex, outside the radius of maximum winds, the winds increase rapidly as you move inward. Once you reach the RMW, the winds drop off toward the center of the storm, in such a fashion that the fluid inside the RMW rotates like a solid body (like a carousel, as you mentioned). Looking at Ike now, the area near the center of the storm where the clouds appear to be rotating more slowly than those around it is that solid-body rotation region inside the RMW.



Closer look at the 'eye'. Look quick before it gets dark. Quite impressive, unfortunately.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... ible_float


I see some new convective bursts as well. Not a good time for this to intensify.
0 likes   

Solaris
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:54 am

#9664 Postby Solaris » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:31 pm

Image

Thats the latest water vapor pic, no eye for me, instead it looks like dry air still coming in
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

#9665 Postby txwatcher91 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:31 pm

M. E03/16/10

Does this mean 3 eyewalls?
0 likes   

User avatar
feederband
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Lakeland Fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9666 Postby feederband » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:32 pm

HarlequinBoy wrote:
Tireman4 wrote:Me neither. It will be a rough ride, but if you are prepared, have the essentials, and pick up things out of your yard, just ride it out.


Yeah, I just told her to buy what she'd need for possibly a few days without power.


As large as this is...More than a few days..
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#9667 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:32 pm

Don't use water vapor for looking for any type of intensification. It's probably the last place an eye shows up.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re:

#9668 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:33 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:M. E03/16/10

Does this mean 3 eyewalls?

No, it means it's elliptical.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: Re:

#9669 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:33 pm

The link below is a list of pet friendly shelters.....so there is no excuse to stay in surge zone. If not for themselves, protect their pets and bring them to safe place.

http://www.petfriendlytravel.com/?page=pet_shelters#TX

Sihara wrote:
HurricaneQueen wrote: This is made more complicated if they have pets who would not do well if separated from their owners. Unfortunately, if they stay in high risk areas they may find themselves separated only to come together on "rainbow bridge".

Both fear and ignorance are great paralyzers and I suppose many are suffering from one or both. IMHO, very strong language from the highest authorities need to try to get through to those who are risking all by not leaving.



Lynn, this nearly happened in my family - wouldn't leave for a storm because of the pets. I would think the best thing to do - won't do much good now, but for future ref - at the beginning of hurricane season, find a vet, kennel or something and make arrangements for them to take the pets on short notice - someplace inland and out of harm's way.

Doesn't help though that fear does paralyze, and as someone pointed out earlier in the thread, people in these areas, TX and LA have hurricane fatigue. OMG it has to wear you down when the storms keep coming.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#9670 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:34 pm

txwatcher91 wrote:M. E03/16/10

Does this mean 3 eyewalls?


To it means an elipitical eyewall with the axis being 30 to 210 degrees with the major axis being 16 nm and the minor axis being 10nm.
0 likes   

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: Re:

#9671 Postby txwatcher91 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:34 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:M. E03/16/10

Does this mean 3 eyewalls?

No, it means it's elliptical.


I know it is elliptical, but the numbers, 3, 16, and 10, aren't those 3 eyewalls, or is the 10 part of the old eye?
0 likes   

User avatar
Annie Oakley
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
Location: Texas

Re:

#9672 Postby Annie Oakley » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:34 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Image

Holy Cow!!!!!! (sorry ya'll)
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

Re: Re:

#9673 Postby HurryKane » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:35 pm

baygirl_1 wrote:
JenBayles wrote:I'm thinking the same thing David. We can't board our windows: 3 bays, and they're all recessed in brick. No wood frames to screw into for clips to grip. I figure our front rooms are hosed.

This may be a little late (just got home from school and am playing catch-up with reading), but... have you tried the Plylox clips? My sister and her husband have used those. Their windows are recessed in brick and they work well. I'm not sure if Lowe's or Home Depot would still have them, but it's an idea. Also, as someone metioned on the board, I've seen many people do that with a crossbar-type 2X4-- just cut the ends at opposite diagonals and slide it over the board until it fits tight. I've also seen people use 2X4s as braces against the window boards, with the braces running upward from the ground. Does that make sense? It's hard to describe without drawing a picture. Also, diapers are great for soaking up water that may be driven in through windowseals or under doors. I've heard that a good place to protect pictures is in plastic containers or garbage bags (double or triple bagged) in a bathtub as the pipes provide extra support for the walls. That's where I've stored the pictures we couldn't take with us. Fortunately, we've never had to test that theory and I hope y'all won't either. Hang in there--we are all praying for y'all out there!




I'm thinking for a bay window recessed in brick, you could cut the plywood to fit the brick edges minus 1/4" allowance (or whatever it is for Plylox clips) for the edges which will be next to brick, and then use hinges to hook together the boards where the bay window sections come together--like a really big tri-fold brochure.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#9674 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:35 pm

MAX FL WIND 101 KT NE QUAD 18:54:30 Z
SFC WIND SEEN VISUALLY

I could be wrong, but I think this means they're going to raise winds to 105 mph since I think that's confirmation that winds are going to the surface.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#9675 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:36 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:MAX FL WIND 101 KT NE QUAD 18:54:30 Z
SFC WIND SEEN VISUALLY

I could be wrong, but I think this means they're going to raise winds to 105 mph since I think that's confirmation that winds are going to the surface.


The surface wind observed visually was: D. 50 kt
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9676 Postby PTPatrick » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:36 pm

is it just me or has outflow improved?

My cousin lives in Kemah with a view of the Bay. They obviously evacuated but what kinda surge would Kemah be looking at if the middle or Galveston Island Landall comes true.
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

#9677 Postby Rod Hagen » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:36 pm

probably coming under a bit more influence from the anomaly shown at 90ºW on http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dataphod1 ... 8254go.jpg
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#9678 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:37 pm

RL3AO wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:MAX FL WIND 101 KT NE QUAD 18:54:30 Z
SFC WIND SEEN VISUALLY

I could be wrong, but I think this means they're going to raise winds to 105 mph since I think that's confirmation that winds are going to the surface.


The surface wind observed visually was: D. 50 kt


Oh lol, oops, sorry guys.
0 likes   

Smurfwicked
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 164
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: SETX

Re:

#9679 Postby Smurfwicked » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:38 pm

wx247 wrote:Okay, I am watching KHOU's live coverage and they are reporting that the city of Galveston has moved its emergency operations center to the San Luis hotel. This hotel sits right along the beach according to live shots. I realize there is a seawall and that the hotel is 20 feet high, but to me that seems silly. Thoughts?


Sounds stupid to me. I guess I'm confused with how their seawall works anyways because my understanding is that is just a wall (not to be confused with a levee) that protects half the island and its not enclosed (or so I thought) which would allow the water to pour in at the end of it wouldn't it?

Local met Greg Bostwick said everybody south of I-10 in Jefferson & Orange counties should not choose to "ride this one out" as he put it.
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#9680 Postby shah8 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:40 pm

The interesting part of that recon is that the surface data, when it was present, is showing a more traditional relationship of flight to surface winds.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests