Tropical Storm Edouard recon discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Personally, I doubt they'll confirm the existance of a closed LLC, since I don't think it's present at this time. As I mentioned, the first signs of a formative LLC may be documented under the convection and MLC further south. Recent satellite imagery suggests that new convection may eventually develop in the vicinity between 25.9-28.9 N and 86.8-89.1 W as well. It will be interesting to observe future buoy/ASOS coastal observations later today and tonight.
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29096
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
Re:
MiamiensisWx wrote:Personally, I doubt they'll confirm the existance of a closed LLC, since I don't think it's present at this time. As I mentioned, the first signs of a formative LLC may be documented under the convection and MLC further south. Recent satellite imagery suggests that new convection may eventually develop in the vicinity between 25.9-28.9 N and 86.8-89.1 W as well. It will be interesting to observe future buoy/ASOS coastal observations later today and tonight.
I've been checking them this morning on a regular basis. I found obs lately that suggest a secondary circulation over the extreme SE tip of LA. I'm sure this is an anamoly of some sort, but it also suggests to me that there may be other " mini-vorts" circulating around the larger broad circulation. Needs to be a lot more consolidation in the lower levels for this system to start any kind of strengthening, much less become a tropical depression, imo. I definitely would like the rain something like this would bring to SE TX if track progs are correct, but I'm starting to wonder if it is going to develop. Don't get me wrong, I am not writing this off but I think development, whatever form it takes is going to be much slower than many think.
0 likes
200M...thats really low isn't it though I suppose its a weak system.
Edit---flight winds of 33kts and estimate surface winds of 34...if LLC is found we may see this go straight to TS status!
Edit---flight winds of 33kts and estimate surface winds of 34...if LLC is found we may see this go straight to TS status!
Last edited by KWT on Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- hurricanefloyd5
- Category 5
- Posts: 1659
- Age: 44
- Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
- Location: Spartanburg
- Contact:
Re: 91L recon discussion
I expect that the RECON will find a TD and then after that I think watches/warning could go out.. With a system this close to land that I am sure is safe to say but I want to ait and sea what the recon find first and I am not trying to jump ahead of RECON'S ability to do the flight job!!!!!!!!!
RECON ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RECON ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8345
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8345
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: 91L recon discussion
Found this cool decoding site...
http://tropicalatlantic.com/recon/
Are these winds correct?
Estimated Surface Wind (30 sec. Avg.)
Using Estimated Reduction Factor Peak Wind at Flight Level to
Est. Surface Reduction Factor
44.9 knots (~ 51.7 mph)
Tropical Storm
http://tropicalatlantic.com/recon/
Are these winds correct?
Estimated Surface Wind (30 sec. Avg.)
Using Estimated Reduction Factor Peak Wind at Flight Level to
Est. Surface Reduction Factor
44.9 knots (~ 51.7 mph)
Tropical Storm
Last edited by SouthFloridawx on Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re:
MiamiensisWx wrote:It should be noted that the SFMR reading isn't flagged as "suspect". It could have been accurate, but it isn't representative of the system's maximum 1-min winds. It may have been related to one of the more intense, localized thunderstorms.
It never tagged the 100kt SFMR readings during Cristobal either.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests