ATL : INVEST 93L

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#101 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:11 pm

cycloneye wrote::uarrow: Here is the link to the 93L models thread.

viewtopic.php?f=59&t=105674&start=0

thanks cycloneye.

btw, has anyone noticed the eddy on the north side of the system? looks to take up a good portion of the north side of the system
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#102 Postby Sanibel » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:12 pm

Disclaimer: Internet weenie opinion and not official:


Good point about weaker disturbances surviving Yucatan better that stronger ones.

Seeing the better mid-level convergence I'd gamble with development at this point from past behavior of similar disturbances. The only question will be if it is one of those broad GOM June TS's or something tighter. Still, the wise forecaster waits and sees.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL : MODELS : INVEST 93L

#103 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:12 pm

NOGAPS and Euro not impressed.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#104 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:14 pm

cycloneye wrote::uarrow: Here is the link to the 93L models thread.

viewtopic.php?f=59&t=105674&start=0


NoGaps and Euro not impressed...


If I had an official scale, which I don't, I'd go from yellow to pastel blue, under 15%.

Of course, I am an amateur and don't have an official color scale.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#105 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:14 pm

I thought the Yucatan helps weak systems tighten up.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

#106 Postby srainhoutx » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:15 pm

I will say congrats NAM for sniffing this out for the past 48 hours. The new NAM may have scored a coup.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#107 Postby cheezyWXguy » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:15 pm

Sanibel wrote:Disclaimer: Internet weenie opinion and not official:


Good point about weaker disturbances surviving Yucatan better that stronger ones.

Seeing the better mid-level convergence I'd gamble with development at this point from past behavior of similar disturbances. The only question will be if it is one of those broad GOM June TS's or something tighter. Still, the wise forecaster waits and sees.

If/Once it develops, there's not a whole lot seen at this point that could really slow it down from becoming a hurricane, unless it continues to drift west, bringing it to slightly cooler water temps, and less time over water. Other than that, especially if it goes NE, then I think its possible-assuming it develops at all-to ramp up in strength and possibly become a hurricane. Much too early at this point tho
0 likes   

User avatar
Sjones
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 2:09 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

Re: ATL : MODELS : INVEST 93L

#108 Postby Sjones » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:28 pm

interesting model run from wunderground...


http://www.wunderground.com/modelmaps/maps.asp
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : MODELS : INVEST 93L

#109 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:33 pm

Sjones wrote:interesting model run from wunderground...


http://www.wunderground.com/modelmaps/maps.asp



Looks like it will tangle with a front which slows it and eventually turns it Northeast once reaching the Central GOM. I'm haveing trouble believing such a front will make it into the Given the opressive Death Ridge in these parts.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#110 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:34 pm

Image

Image
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6681
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#111 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:35 pm

A hurricane....hmmmmm I don't know about that.

cheezyWXguy wrote:
Sanibel wrote:Disclaimer: Internet weenie opinion and not official:


Good point about weaker disturbances surviving Yucatan better that stronger ones.

Seeing the better mid-level convergence I'd gamble with development at this point from past behavior of similar disturbances. The only question will be if it is one of those broad GOM June TS's or something tighter. Still, the wise forecaster waits and sees.

If/Once it develops, there's not a whole lot seen at this point that could really slow it down from becoming a hurricane, unless it continues to drift west, bringing it to slightly cooler water temps, and less time over water. Other than that, especially if it goes NE, then I think its possible-assuming it develops at all-to ramp up in strength and possibly become a hurricane. Much too early at this point tho
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#112 Postby ROCK » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:37 pm

nada at the surface. the Euro doesnt sniff it nor the CMC or NOGAPS. Got that feeling of poofness....
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#113 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:39 pm

ROCK wrote:nada at the surface. the Euro doesnt sniff it nor the CMC or NOGAPS. Got a that feeling of poofness....


Yeah, but I thought it would poof last night but it didn't. NHC has given it a code orange so that should say something.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#114 Postby ROCK » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:43 pm

srainhoutx wrote:I will say congrats NAM for sniffing this out for the past 48 hours. The new NAM may have scored a coup.


Steve, its the NAM and always will be the NAM....every blind squirrel finds a acorn once in a while..... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#115 Postby Evil Jeremy » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:48 pm

My computer died a few days ago. Of course, it has to do so once something starts popping up in the Caribbean and the models point it my way lol. Anyways, I like how the NHC is thinking about when this system moves into the GOM instead of about its chances for formation at the given moment.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#116 Postby srainhoutx » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:48 pm

ROCK wrote:
srainhoutx wrote:I will say congrats NAM for sniffing this out for the past 48 hours. The new NAM may have scored a coup.


Steve, its the NAM and always will be the NAM....every blind squirrel finds a acorn once in a while..... :lol:


Point taken Paul, but facts are facts... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145251
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#117 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:49 pm

There is a nice eddy well north of the main action (Near the Isle of Youth)That may be what caused the convection to be strong last night.

Image

Loop below.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... is_floater
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6681
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL : MODELS : INVEST 93L

#118 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:50 pm

I have hard time seeing this move anywhere but NE if and when it enters the GOM. JMHO

HouTXmetro wrote:
Sjones wrote:interesting model run from wunderground...


http://www.wunderground.com/modelmaps/maps.asp



Looks like it will tangle with a front which slows it and eventually turns it Northeast once reaching the Central GOM. I'm haveing trouble believing such a front will make it into the Given the opressive Death Ridge in these parts.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5896
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL : INVEST 93L

#119 Postby MGC » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:54 pm

I don't see anything coming of this in the next few days. A wave interacting with a ULL over BOC is causing all the convection in the NW Carb. Does look like a UL ridge is building over the NW Carb. I might have a chance of development once over the GOM. At this point I'll take a weak TS as long as I get some heavy rains....MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Re:

#120 Postby ROCK » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:11 pm

srainhoutx wrote:
ROCK wrote:
srainhoutx wrote:I will say congrats NAM for sniffing this out for the past 48 hours. The new NAM may have scored a coup.


Steve, its the NAM and always will be the NAM....every blind squirrel finds a acorn once in a while..... :lol:


Point taken Paul, but facts are facts... :lol:



it did sniff Alberto a few years back before the upgrades.....hmmm
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests