theavocado wrote:ozonepete wrote:This track makes much more sense to me than the JTWC one.
The problem is that JMA has been saying this for a while, yet the system keeps tracking west. I personally don't see the sudden turn. There is a weak shortwave over western china, but there appears to be a very weak finger of the STR to the north of the system that can protect it a little. I think the models are biting off on the zonal midlatitude flow, because they turn so suddenly and have been doing it for so long.
Yes, this just stays complicated because it's BEEN complicated for a while now, and none of the factors are changing significantly enough. I agree with what you said about the models and their buying into the westerlies picking it up. From the last few frames it looks like it's still basically stationary - it's hard to even get a decent fix on the center what with that raggedy eye only visible from microwave. The wobbly raggedy "eye" or center is clearly due to the really poor symmetry. At times you can actually see it getting pulled in two or three different directions at the same time. How could a radius of maximum winds or an eye ever develop under these conditions? That's why it seems all we can do is wait and watch for one of these ridges to really take hold. Til then I'm still in the JMA camp, but not because of any loyalty. I like the JTWC. It's more because most of the models have come to a consensus on a pretty sudden recurve, and it will only take one good nudge to the east to kick it off. A nudge to the west is not as likely.