http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=15
Code: Select all
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=20&lon=-84&info=vis&zoom=1&width=3000&height=2000&type=Animation&numframes=15
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Code: Select all
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=20&lon=-84&info=vis&zoom=1&width=3000&height=2000&type=Animation&numframes=15
Normandy wrote:Yea, the eyewall being present on radar indicates its pretty well organized. The CDO is quite impressive. Its going over some prime fuel.
ozonepete wrote:RI a distinct possibility now. Symmetry is getting impressive with a very circular CDO and some really good outflow to the north and east. Looks like it will have a visible eye soon.
jinftl wrote:The forecast tracks speak nothing of intensity.....several models have Ida losing its tropical characteristics in line with the timetable the current NHC forecast does (between Monday and Tuesday, while still south of the Gulf Coast).
In fact, I am not aware (I could be wrong) of any model showing Ida as a landfalling hurricane on the Gulf Coast.Stormcenter wrote:The funny thing is the waters are just not warm enough anymore to support this type of storm.
The models are in la la land folks.
Stormcenter wrote:I was referring to the post below in reference to the model sbeing in lal la land. I didn't mention anything about a landfalling hurricane only that the waters could not support one because theyare just too cool. In addition shear will be a major factor too.
It's a really interesting how these models are still having monster systems even in the central-north GOM but I'd be shocked if we saw anything as strong as HWRF has up there.jinftl wrote:The forecast tracks speak nothing of intensity.....several models have Ida losing its tropical characteristics in line with the timetable the current NHC forecast does (between Monday and Tuesday, while still south of the Gulf Coast).
In fact, I am not aware (I could be wrong) of any model showing Ida as a landfalling hurricane on the Gulf Coast.Stormcenter wrote:The funny thing is the waters are just not warm enough anymore to support this type of storm.
The models are in la la land folks.
Code: Select all
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=21&lon=-84&info=ir&zoom=1&width=3000&height=2000&type=Animation&numframes=10&palette=spect.pal
Aric Dunn wrote:ozonepete wrote:RI a distinct possibility now. Symmetry is getting impressive with a very circular CDO and some really good outflow to the north and east. Looks like it will have a visible eye soon.
well RI would be possible but not like we would see normally... as its forward motion increases it will help with the shear problem but then it has less time over the warm ssts..
Aric Dunn wrote:ozonepete wrote:RI a distinct possibility now. Symmetry is getting impressive with a very circular CDO and some really good outflow to the north and east. Looks like it will have a visible eye soon.
well RI would be possible but not like we would see normally... as its forward motion increases it will help with the shear problem but then it has less time over the warm ssts..
vacanechaser wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:Going to be interesting few days thats for sure..
i will say that would be one hellofa fast shift to extrop... something i have a hard time following right now... will be watching it closely tonight and tomorrow...
wxman57 wrote:vacanechaser wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:Going to be interesting few days thats for sure..
i will say that would be one hellofa fast shift to extrop... something i have a hard time following right now... will be watching it closely tonight and tomorrow...
Hi, Jesse.
I think what we'll see is that as soon as Ida reaches north of about 25-26N it'll hit that jet core and the convection will be all stripped off to the NNE very quickly, leaving an exposed center. Strongest winds by that time may be 150 miles north of the center, maybe more. Nothing to make landfall. Once storms hit the jet stream (70-80 kt SSW-SW flow aloft in this case) they don't last long.
ozonepete wrote:
Unless it does an ET to a mostly baroclinic low...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests