GOM: INVEST 90L

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#321 Postby HURAKAN » Fri May 22, 2009 9:54 am

vacanechaser wrote:thanx for locking/deleting the other post... i did nto see this thread... thanx


Actually, I merged both threads!

Image
0 likes   

nashrobertsx
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:55 pm

#322 Postby nashrobertsx » Fri May 22, 2009 9:58 am

AL, 90, 2009052212, , BEST, 0, 266N, 873W, 25, 1006, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 300, 125, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,

JESSE, can you decode this please?
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#323 Postby Bailey1777 » Fri May 22, 2009 10:04 am

Jesse on the sat. shot posted above it say's movement is to the north at 4mph. I just knew if I said "next" they would classify it.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#324 Postby HURAKAN » Fri May 22, 2009 10:10 am

Image

Image
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#325 Postby Bailey1777 » Fri May 22, 2009 10:13 am

This is probably just precautionary to cover all the bases, just in case. Looks like a due north movement to me, may not even make it West of the Florida panhandle.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#326 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Fri May 22, 2009 10:13 am

I don't see them upgrading something this marginal looking to a TD or STD without recon, and I don't see them tasking recon for this when it is a little over a day from likely landfall.



This would have a better chance being upgraded to STD #1 if it were beyond aircraft range.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#327 Postby HURAKAN » Fri May 22, 2009 10:31 am

Image

Image

It looks better than 24 hrs but still not there.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#328 Postby HURAKAN » Fri May 22, 2009 10:37 am

Image
0 likes   

jpwxman
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:13 am
Location: Houston

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#329 Postby jpwxman » Fri May 22, 2009 10:38 am

Actually, it looks less-organized today as far as low level clouds. More storms closer to the center but the upper low is well north of the surface feature. NHC initialized on a low level swirl embedded within the larger, broad circulation. Wouldn't be surprised if they issue advisories since it's so close to land; I've seen them issue for weaker systems many times before.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalWXMA
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#330 Postby TropicalWXMA » Fri May 22, 2009 10:40 am

AL, 90, 2009052212, , BEST, 0, 266N, 873W, 25, 1006, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 300, 125, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,

Coordinates: 26.N/87.3W

Pressure: 1006

Winds: 34 mph.


That's the best I could do!




nashrobertsx wrote:AL, 90, 2009052212, , BEST, 0, 266N, 873W, 25, 1006, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 300, 125, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,

JESSE, can you decode this please?
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: GOM: Invest 90L Models

#331 Postby Stormcenter » Fri May 22, 2009 10:41 am

90L is still not doing much so I'm not sure why the invest now.
It actually looked "better" yesterday. Oh well hopefully
it will bring some beneficial rains to the areas that need it.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

User avatar
vacanechaser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Portsmouth, Va
Contact:

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#332 Postby vacanechaser » Fri May 22, 2009 10:46 am

TropicalWXMA wrote:AL, 90, 2009052212, , BEST, 0, 266N, 873W, 25, 1006, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 300, 125, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,

Coordinates: 26.N/87.3W

Pressure: 1006

Winds: 34 mph.


That's the best I could do!




nashrobertsx wrote:AL, 90, 2009052212, , BEST, 0, 266N, 873W, 25, 1006, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1011, 300, 125, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,

JESSE, can you decode this please?



lol... thanx for jumping in on the question.. thats about all i could decode too.. the rest of it, not so sure.. have not really looked it over either..



Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#333 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Fri May 22, 2009 10:56 am

Strongest squalls just West of Tampa
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#334 Postby tolakram » Fri May 22, 2009 11:00 am

Up close it doesn't look as good but take a step back and it looks pretty vigorous. Can someone post any temperature analysis? Is the core warming at all (is that even the correct terminology)?

Flash loop:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-vis.html

Image

Image
0 likes   

Bailey1777
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 962
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:23 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#335 Postby Bailey1777 » Fri May 22, 2009 11:05 am

On WV imagery it looks like dry air is starting to really kick it's butt.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#336 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Fri May 22, 2009 11:09 am

Image
Much improved banding on the NE Side, it is moving into
low shear.
IMO we may get a short lived Tropical Storm Ana later today
and early tomorrow...should make landfall with a North motion
at the MS/FL border...perhaps as far west as LA
depending on steering. Maximum winds are 35 mph,
surfs up in the Panhandle!
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re:

#337 Postby gatorcane » Fri May 22, 2009 11:10 am

Bailey1777 wrote:On WV imagery it looks like dry air is starting to really kick it's butt.


Actually looks like alot less dry air surrounding it today, probably why it is now an invest as conditions have improved for it albeit SSTs are only marginal running in the upper 70s.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


This won't become Anna or even a depression but will stay as an invest.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalWXMA
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#338 Postby TropicalWXMA » Fri May 22, 2009 11:15 am

Models are beginning to lean towards an eventual warm-core'd storm.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: Re:

#339 Postby Category 5 » Fri May 22, 2009 11:15 am

gatorcane wrote:
Bailey1777 wrote:This won't become Anna or even a depression but will stay as an invest.


Have to agree with this. Theres still enough dry air to keep it down.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: GOM: INVEST 90L

#340 Postby Stormcenter » Fri May 22, 2009 11:17 am

I'm sorry but 90L still looks like crap. Yes I know looks can be deceiving but in this case I think they are not.
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests