cycloneye wrote:Derek,why there are different positions from SSD dvorak and Best Track?
different agencies right..
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:Derek,why there are different positions from SSD dvorak and Best Track?
KWT wrote:Its probably a mute point though because there probably isn't yet a true surface center to track.
Have to admit that is quite a big difference there Cycloneye, but yeah its just different agencies that are progging where they think any center is. Its probably a mute point though because there probably isn't yet a true surface center to track.
KWT wrote:Have to admit that is quite a big difference there Cycloneye, but yeah its just different agencies that are progging where they think any center is. Its probably a mute point though because there probably isn't yet a true surface center to track.
KWT wrote:Once again GFS based models are furthest east, even though the 18z has come somewhat closer to the coast on this run and does eventually come very close to the NE The other dynamic models actually in pretty good agreement it appears.
KWT wrote:Yeah I agree Aric though until an actual strong center of circulation forms we can't rule out any formation away from where we think it is which would bring the GFS back into play.
However for now if the center forms roughly where we think then the models you mention would have the best idea.
btangy wrote:The upper level flow remains very complex with an upper level low nearly co-located with the 92L and a sharp upper level trough to the N. I remain skeptical that the global models are handling the evolution of these features with much fidelity.
At this time, the upper level low is making it hard for 92L to consolidate an area of thunderstorms to form tight low level center. Convection is quickly firing, decaying, and forming large cold pools at the surface. An example of which can be seen to the SE of the wave axis as a thin arcing cloud line with a line of storms firing behind it like you would see in the Midwest with a fast moving squall line along a gust front. This is very typical of sheared, conditionally unstable environments.
The wave axis of 92L does seem to be moving forward a bit faster than the upper level low and models are emphatic on placing 92L in a very favorable area of upper level difluence/divergence in 24-48 hours. Provided this happens, quick development may occur around this time frame, but location is key. Instead, if 92L keeps doing the tango with the upper level low, then development will be slow as it'll be more of a subtropical flavor with the cold core aloft slowly eroding away.
There's still much uncertainty as to where the initial LLC will ultimately form which will make all the difference in the future track. It is quite possible one could wake up tomorrow morning and the convection will be in a totally different location and we can all restart guessing and straining our eyes as to where the clouds appear to be closing off a circulation. IMO, I say this thing needs at least another 24 hours to marinate.
cycloneye wrote:Derek,why there are different positions from SSD dvorak and Best Track?
SSD=22.5N 67.1W
Best Track=23.3N-66.7W
jinftl wrote:Great analysis (as always) this evening from Dr. Jeff Masters....
The tropical wave (92L) a few hundred miles north of Puerto Rico is generating a large area of surface winds of 50 - 60 mph, according to the latest information from the Hurricane Hunters. Top winds seen so far at their flight level of 1,000 feet were 69 mph, which would make 92L a strong tropical storm if it had a surface circulation.
However, the aircraft has not found a surface circulation, and the satellite appearance shows virtually no change in the amount, intensity, or organization of the storm's thunderstorm activity.
Wind shear has dropped to the moderate range, 15 - 20 knots this afternoon, but the upper low 92L is moving underneath is dumping cold, dry air into the region. Dry air continues to get ingested into 92L's thunderstorms, creating strong downdrafts that are robbing 92L of heat and moisture. These downdrafts are creating surface arc clouds that spread out from where the downdraft hits the ocean surface. NHC continues to give 92L a high (greater than 50% chance) of developing into a tropical depression by Thursday afternoon.
As 92L moves underneath the center of the upper low on Wednesday morning, the upper low is expected to weaken, and wind shear is expected to decline to the low range, 5 - 10 knots. However, the upper-level low will continue to dump dry, cold air into 92L through Thursday afternoon, slowing down development. By Thursday night, when 92L should be several hundred miles off the coast of northern Florida, the upper-level low may be weak enough and far enough away that 92L will find itself in a region with light upper level anticyclonic winds, which would favor more rapid development.
However, this favorable environment will not last long, since a strong trough of low pressure will be approaching the U.S. East Coast on Friday. This trough will bring high wind shear of 20 - 30 knots by Friday night. This trough should be strong enough to turn 92L to the north. The models disagree substantially on how close 92L will be to the coast at that time. One camp of models, including the NOGAPS, Canadian, UKMET, and ECMWF models, predict 92L will pass very close to the Outer Banks of North Carolina on Friday night or Saturday morning. The GFS, GFDL, and HWRF models keep 92L several hundred miles out to sea. Both sets of models bring 92L north-northeastwards on Saturday, with a track over Massachusetts or Nova Scotia. The intensity forecast for 92L is problematic, since it's eventual strength depends upon how quickly it manages to become a tropical depression. Given that 92L will find itself in a favorable environment for strengthening for about 36 hours this week, and marginal for the remainder of the week, I give the system these odds:
10% chance of never getting a name.
20% chance of becoming a weak tropical storm (40 - 50 mph winds).
40% chance of becoming a strong tropical storm (55 - 70 mph winds).
30% chance of attaining hurricane strength.
Elsewhere in the Atlantic
The ECMWF and UKMET models predict the development of a tropical wave coming off the coast of Africa late this week. The GFS model no longer shows this.
I'll have an update Wednesday morning.
Jeff Masters
Ivanhater wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:Ortt's first call
hurricane by Friday
Now that's what I call making a bold forecast! Props for putting your neck out Derek![]()
Probably going to get even busier for you with the model support of the African system and the subtropical ridge building in...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests