ATL: TROPICAL LOW ex-FRED (ex-07L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10146
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION FRED (07L)

#901 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:17 pm

:uarrow: I estimate former Fred is about 1850 miles from SFL longitude, which is just about 120 hours out at 15 mph, IMO former Fred is moving faster than 15 mph. If that ridge holds up it could drive former Fred very close or over SFL before the ridge begins to erode
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION FRED (07L)

#902 Postby MWatkins » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:18 pm

I am actually a bit concerned about what is left over from Fred (which, according to some here, would never ever never make it past 40 west).

It has been pulsing up and down over the last couple of days, but the shear has let up some and with ridging building in, it could find itself in a favorable environment by the end of the week. That circulation has held together remarkably well considering the conditions, and these systems always bother me (these that hang around like this) especially at this time of year.

I may just be getting old, but IF this does come back, and the 0Z SHIP guidance sure suggests it could, it once again illustrates the folly of message board deterministic forecasting.

Anyone who knows for sure what a system is going to do is selling you snake oil. I have much greater respect for the forecasters who give ranges of probability, and who can discuss different scenarios.

MW
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145347
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION FRED (07L)

#903 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:24 pm

MWatkins wrote:I am actually a bit concerned about what is left over from Fred (which, according to some here, would never ever never make it past 40 west).

It has been pulsing up and down over the last couple of days, but the shear has let up some and with ridging building in, it could find itself in a favorable environment by the end of the week. That circulation has held together remarkably well considering the conditions, and these systems always bother me (these that hang around like this) especially at this time of year.

I may just be getting old, but IF this does come back, and the 0Z SHIP guidance sure suggests it could, it once again illustrates the folly of message board deterministic forecasting.

Anyone who knows for sure what a system is going to do is selling you snake oil. I have much greater respect for the forecasters who give ranges of probability, and who can discuss different scenarios.

MW


Good points Mike.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re:

#904 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:24 pm

AdamFirst wrote:Gained about two degrees longitude in 6 hours. I'd say it's moving at a pretty good clip.

Well for one, we cant be certain where the true center is...and for two, it is possible the center jumped to the deeper convection. Nonetheless, those who say it is dead, done, gone forever may wanna rethink that just slightly...
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION FRED (07L)

#905 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:27 pm

I just do not get it when people make comments like there is NO WAY it is coming to the U.S. This is not the first time, if you make certainty posts, you will get burned sooner or later.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145347
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION FRED (07L)

#906 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:29 pm

:uarrow: Like the dead pronouncements.Those bite back. :)
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#907 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:30 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#908 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:30 pm

The SHPS/DSHPS on the last post on the models thread bring it to 72 knots at 120 hours (strengthening the entire model run)
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#909 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:33 pm

I for one must admit, I thought it was not even going to have the slightest chance to make a run at the Caribbean or CONUS, at least when I looked at the synoptics last week at this time.

But once I saw the ridge projections by the models from last weekend and the fact it was going to bend back to the west, you saw my posts indicating that we should not write it off yet.

I do admit it seems to be moving W to WNW at a fairly good clip now which shows it is caught under a solid ridge at least at the lower-levels. Question is if it develops do the falling heights projections by some of the global models in the long-range still hold? In that case a curve east of the CONUS would still be likely (albeit with a possible Bermuda threat?)

Watch that area E of the Bahamas, should it develop into anything and move off to the NE, that would be the weakness needed to block Fred from impacting the CONUS. But should it not develop, we would need to see a trough to enter the picture around day 7 maybe?
Last edited by gatorcane on Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION FRED (07L)

#910 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:34 pm

I think the odds of Fred coming back are getting better and better, and when you think of it, this should not come as a surprise. History is full of examples where major 'canes made landfall (obviously different than Fred, but just to illustrate), weakened to remnant lows over land, only to spring back to life once they hit the water (where conditions were favorable). So systems often come back, and it is not all that rare, especially when the system was once a strong vortex like Fred.
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re:

#911 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:35 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Link: http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_1

Going poof again?


Yup, it will likely pulse up and down I think. But the trend is for bigger pulses, so it will probably bounce back again.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#912 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:38 pm

So many many many times.. i think I started preaching once ( or twice lol ) on here about the stark realities of the tropics and people including mets blowing things off systems to quickly just to have them come back. notice the NHC they have had code yellow the entire time! while others like watkins has mentioned called the all clear even with the nhc saying there has been possibility. Also i recall nearly everyone on here saying its a fish storm and will never effect land, and now it is possible that it may affect land in some way to early to tell for sure but the models this entire time have been maintaining the system through the period..

Anyway Fred being in a marginal environment now but still very close to the ull which may limit the convection on the southern portion of the circ will with a little from the ull dropping slightly wsw which would put fred on the northern more conducive side of the ull. if that happens strengthening may even be a higher possibility.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#913 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:39 pm

The 18Z GFS does not develop Fred, but if you look at the H5 charts, it shows a considerable Western Atlantic ridge at day 7 with an approaching trough to the west.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: Re:

#914 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:40 pm

Emmett_Brown wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:Link: http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_1

Going poof again?


Yup, it will likely pulse up and down I think. But the trend is for bigger pulses, so it will probably bounce back again.


Also, I fully expect certain members of the board to declare Fred dead for good when this recent burst wanes... we have to keep our eye on the overall trend. Here is the trend we are seeing now:

1. Shear still there, but lessening.
2. Moisture envelop slowly returning.
3. Upper level low is moderately negative for development, so should keep Fred from rapidly strengthening.
4. Ships model slowly strengthening over the next 5 days, indicating it also sees slowly improving conditions.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#915 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:40 pm

The southern side needs the convection the worst, it was only holding on by 5 knots.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#916 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:41 pm

Question: if it develops as the SHIPs indicates, would that mean more west or more poleward (north)?
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10146
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re:

#917 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:41 pm

:uarrow: If Fred ever makes it to Florida it will be before 7 days, so if Fred regenerates, which I think he will, he may be moving generally towards SFL.
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re:

#918 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:43 pm

gatorcane wrote:Question: if it develops as the SHIPs indicates, would that mean more west or more poleward (north)?


The BAMMD shows a more westerly track, so I think it sees that the H500 ridge is forecast to be strong; so it looks like stronger means more west in this case.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10146
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: Re:

#919 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:44 pm

Gator, IMO this is the last W bound system SFL needs to dodge this year. After Fred is gone time to start watching the NW Caribbean.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#920 Postby gatorcane » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:47 pm

http://www.ecmwf.int/products/forecasts ... 9091512!!/

That is the ECMWF H5 map for 120 hours from 12Z today :uarrow:
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests