ATL: EX-Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1061 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:49 pm

Image

very disorganized is what RECON is finding
0 likes   

User avatar
Acral
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:31 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1062 Postby Acral » Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:52 pm

HurricaneBelle wrote:Time to upgrade immediately to Hurricane Danielle:

http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/ASOS/c ... rk=FL_ASOS

PUNTA GORDA,FL (PGD) ASOS reports gust of 118.0 knots from W @ 1841Z


Hmm.. landfalling waterspout maybe, or someone with a super-charged hair dryer blowing on the wind meter?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1063 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:56 pm

Image

latest
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1064 Postby jasons2k » Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:58 pm

Ikester wrote: SST's from what I have read and been told by other pro mets is the gulf waters are the warmest on record..surpassing that of 2005. If that's the case, how come 'Katrina' or 'Rita' hasn't formed yet?


For one, neither Katrina nor Rita formed before August 11th.

We still have a lot of season left and I think we should save the comparisons for later. Yes, it's been 'the year of the ULL' so far but that may change on a dime. And remember, we have already had Alex which was very impressive for June.

Also, yes it's true that SSTs are just one of many factors that contribute to TC cyclogenesis. We have 85-90F water with no storms present most of the summer, every summer, across the Gulf. On a typical summer day in the Gulf, it's sweltering hot, the water is like a bath tub, and there's nothing more than typical isolated/scattered air mass thunderstorms.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that shear should collapse as we head into the peak of the season, and with the record SSTs and TCHP in place, we have a real potential to see some very powerful hurricanes when conditions do become favorable.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneBelle
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
Location: Clearwater, FL

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1065 Postby HurricaneBelle » Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:59 pm

Acral wrote:
HurricaneBelle wrote:Time to upgrade immediately to Hurricane Danielle:

http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/ASOS/c ... rk=FL_ASOS

PUNTA GORDA,FL (PGD) ASOS reports gust of 118.0 knots from W @ 1841Z


Hmm.. landfalling waterspout maybe, or someone with a super-charged hair dryer blowing on the wind meter?


It's a Cat 5 now:

PUNTA GORDA,FL (PGD) ASOS reports gust of 161.0 knots from SSW @ 1853Z

Maybe the ASOS is still screwed up from Charley.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1066 Postby ROCK » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:05 pm

Ikester wrote:People really need to get over the SST's. They mean nothing if the upper-levels are not cooperative. Seas could be 200 degrees F and you have high shear, forget it. If they were absolutely necessary, then how come we had Hurricane Epsilon (waters ~72 degrees F) or Tropical Storm Zeta in January (waters ~70 degrees F), or Hurricane Alice in 1954...another January storm. There are others that have formed in April and May, too. SST's from what I have read and been told by other pro mets is the gulf waters are the warmest on record..surpassing that of 2005. If that's the case, how come 'Katrina' or 'Rita' hasn't formed yet?



People do not need to get over the SST's...they are as equally important as is the upper air environment. Without the fuel, you have nothing, with too much fuel you have possiblity of a devestating TC...

Look at Alex...but that guy in the middle of the GOM with it upper air environment before landfall and you my friend have a cat 5 looking you in the face........

if your looking for a Rita and Katrina I would ask you to wait just a few weeks longer.... :wink: we are only in the first week of August....
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1067 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:05 pm

Let's hope those aren't real wind speeds 3 weeks from now. :eek:


HurricaneBelle wrote:
Acral wrote:
HurricaneBelle wrote:Time to upgrade immediately to Hurricane Danielle:

http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/ASOS/c ... rk=FL_ASOS

PUNTA GORDA,FL (PGD) ASOS reports gust of 118.0 knots from W @ 1841Z


Hmm.. landfalling waterspout maybe, or someone with a super-charged hair dryer blowing on the wind meter?


It's a Cat 5 now:

PUNTA GORDA,FL (PGD) ASOS reports gust of 161.0 knots from SSW @ 1853Z

Maybe the ASOS is still screwed up from Charley.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1068 Postby brunota2003 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:08 pm

Remember, TCs are based off of sustained winds, not gusts ;)

It does look funny to see this, though:

Punta Gorda, Charlotte County Airport
Lat: 26.92 Lon: -81.99 Elev: 23
Last Update on Aug 11, 2:53 pm EDT

A Few Clouds

81 °F
(27 °C)
Humidity: 82 %
Wind Speed: S 8 G 185 MPH
Barometer: 29.98" (1015.3 mb)
Dewpoint: 75 °F (24 °C)
Heat Index: 87 °F (31 °C)
Visibility: 10.00 mi.

So, according to that, as a TC, it wouldn't even technically qualify as a depression. As a tornado, however, it would be an EF4!

http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/5228/td5185oops.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1069 Postby ROCK » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:09 pm

jasons wrote:
Ikester wrote: SST's from what I have read and been told by other pro mets is the gulf waters are the warmest on record..surpassing that of 2005. If that's the case, how come 'Katrina' or 'Rita' hasn't formed yet?


For one, neither Katrina nor Rita formed before August 11th.

We still have a lot of season left and I think we should save the comparisons for later. Yes, it's been 'the year of the ULL' so far but that may change on a dime. And remember, we have already had Alex which was very impressive for June.

Also, yes it's true that SSTs are just one of many factors that contribute to TC cyclogenesis. We have 85-90F water with no storms present most of the summer, every summer, across the Gulf. On a typical summer day in the Gulf, it's sweltering hot, the water is like a bath tub, and there's nothing more than typical isolated/scattered air mass thunderstorms.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that shear should collapse as we head into the peak of the season, and with the record SSTs and TCHP in place, we have a real potential to see some very powerful hurricanes when conditions do become favorable.



very true Jasons.....was trying to say the same thing below... :D
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1070 Postby Florida1118 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:14 pm

TWC still is having a field day...didnt they send Mike Sydel to Louisiana? Hmmm...Maybe hes good luck and kills every storm that he tries to be in? :D I think he was in Bonnie too...
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1071 Postby jasons2k » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:14 pm

cycloneye wrote:From 1 PM CDT Intermediate Advisory:

BULLETIN
TROPICAL DEPRESSION FIVE INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY NUMBER 4A
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL AL052010
100 PM CDT WED AUG 11 2010


SATELLITE AND SURFACE OBSERVATIONS INDICATE THAT THE DEPRESSION IS
LOSING ORGANIZATION AND COULD DISSIPATE LATER TODAY.


I have a question, and no I'm not joking...

Why does the NHC insist on using the word "dissipate" when they downgrade a system from TC/Depression status?

When I see the word "dissipate", I think of a mature thunderstorm that collapses, rains itself out, and 30-minutes later it has vanished into clear blue skies, with maybe some debris cirrus leftover making for a nice sunset. In other words, there is essentially nothing left. By definition, it has "dissipated". It's gone, dead, RIP, no more returns on the radar, it has evaporated, end of story.

But when a TC unravels into a sheared blob -- but that blob is still there and being watched -- I just wouldn't say it "dissipated". Weakened? Yes. Declassified? Yes. Dissipated? Not unless the satellite shot is totally void on any convection anywhere close to where the system was.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1072 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:14 pm

leaving after 17 HDOBs, smells like TD #5 will be no more at 5 pm
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1073 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:16 pm

I agree jasons. I like to use the word "degenerate" and not "dissipate."
0 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3445
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

#1074 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:19 pm

This is pretty funny. The gulf coast will be spared, hopefully they can get some good rains out of it. Season is still far from being over.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1075 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:24 pm

This seals the deal:


235
NOUS42 KNHC 111900
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
0300 PM EDT WED 11 AUGUST 2010
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
VALID 12/1100Z TO 13/1100Z AUGUST 2010
TCPOD NUMBER.....10-073 AMENDMENT

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS --AMENDED
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIIREMENTS.
2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY.....NEGATIVE.
3. REMARKS:
A.ALL TASKING FOR THE AIR FORCE ON TD-05
WAS CANX BY NHC AT 11/1830Z.

B. NOAA IS STILL PLANNING TO FLY SEVERAL
RESEARCH MISSONS THAT WERE ON TCPOD 10-072.

II. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS.
2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK.....NEGATIVE.
WVW
0 likes   

User avatar
gone2beach
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:20 pm
Location: Long Beach, MS

Re: ATL: Tropical Depression FIVE - Discussion

#1076 Postby gone2beach » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:26 pm

I can tell you that here, I am enjoying the cloud cover. This is the first day in weeks that my thermometer has not hit the 90* mark.

Also, just noting for some who may not know and yet another point of interest....when there is a storm in the gulf, no new home insurance policies can be written. That means sales of homes cannot go through.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re:

#1077 Postby jasons2k » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:29 pm

HURAKAN wrote:I agree jasons. I like to use the word "degenerate" and not "dissipate."


Ah, there you go. See, to me, saying "TD#5 has degenerated into an open wave" is a lot more accurate than saying "TD#5 has dissipated"

If it dissipates, I would expect to see a clear satellite image of nothing left, wondering "where did it go? I can't find it any more...it must have dissipated" versus "those (you can point to them) are the remains of Ex-TD 5"...if you can point it out, it hasn't really dissipated, has it?

OK, I'm done. But if anyone has any insight into why they do this, I'd really like to know....
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1078 Postby thetruesms » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:32 pm

jasons wrote:Ah, there you go. See, to me, saying "TD#5 has degenerated into an open wave" is a lot more accurate than saying "TD#5 has dissipated"

If it dissipates, I would expect to see a clear satellite image of nothing left, wondering "where did it go? I can't find it any more...it must have dissipated" versus "those (you can point to them) are the remains of Ex-TD 5"...if you can point it out, it hasn't really dissipated, has it?

OK, I'm done. But if anyone has any insight into why they do this, I'd really like to know....
They say dissipated because the cyclone has indeed dissipated. The convection is not the cyclone, it is just a component of it. As such, there may still be some remaining after the cyclone it was associated with is gone. That being said, I prefer to say degenerated because of the connotation that many have with dissipation as well.
Last edited by thetruesms on Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherSnoop
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 702
Age: 62
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 10:06 pm
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1079 Postby weatherSnoop » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:32 pm

jasons wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:I agree jasons. I like to use the word "degenerate" and not "dissipate."


Ah, there you go. See, to me, saying "TD#5 has degenerated into an open wave" is a lot more accurate than saying "TD#5 has dissipated"

If it dissipates, I would expect to see a clear satellite image of nothing left, wondering "where did it go? I can't find it any more...it must have dissipated" versus "those (you can point to them) are the remains of Ex-TD 5"...if you can point it out, it hasn't really dissipated, has it?

OK, I'm done. But if anyone has any insight into why they do this, I'd really like to know....


Dissipated is easier to type than degenerated :lol:
0 likes   
Lee

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1080 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:34 pm

its kind of cool looking at the wind field over land in this loop ... http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-rgb.html
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests