ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1121 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:43 pm

wx247 wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html

Outflow boundaries everywhere. FAIL


Maybe I am missing something, but I don't see them near the "LLC"... especially not everywhere. :?:


I see outflow boundary coming in from East to West in the convection east of the supposed circulation.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#1122 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:46 pm

I really dont see many outflow boundaries, but what I see is convection moving towards the llc for the time being.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1123 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:47 pm

Yeah I can't see any outflow boundaries with the convection that is close to the circulation either for that matter...
Are you sure your not just seeing the CU lines flowing into the system and mistaking them for outflow boundaries?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1124 Postby I-wall » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:51 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html

Outflow boundaries everywhere. FAIL


What does that mean?
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1125 Postby drezee » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:53 pm

I suspect the well known launguage of "if the current trend continues" to be in order for the 8pm outlook... 2am at the latest
0 likes   

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

#1126 Postby I-wall » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:53 pm

Looks like the old LLC is gone (or being totally sucked in to the new LLC).
0 likes   

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

#1127 Postby I-wall » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:57 pm

When will we get new vorticity maps or ascat images? Is there any other way to confirm that there is a new LLC under the convection?
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re:

#1128 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:58 pm

KWT wrote:Yeah I can't see any outflow boundaries with the convection that is close to the circulation either for that matter...
Are you sure your not just seeing the CU lines flowing into the system and mistaking them for outflow boundaries?


I don't know...I'm not a pro at this... what I see is not exactly flowing into the system instead it's flowing over the system from east to west. perhaps someone can provide a better explanation as to what I am really seeing. Not that yours isn't adequate KWT.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145422
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1129 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:58 pm

Cloud tops of -80C showing up.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re:

#1130 Postby drezee » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:58 pm

I-wall wrote:When will we get new vorticity maps or ascat images? Is there any other way to confirm that there is a new LLC under the convection?


it is sort of though right now...that is why 42057 is so important tonight...as the windfield becomes more symmetric, the heading of the LLC in relation to 42057 will be known by the wind direction at the buoy...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1131 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:59 pm

Yeah those cloud tops are cooling thats for sure cycloneye as we head into the overnight hours, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the LLC is relocating into that convection burst, or maybe just to the west of it.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1132 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:59 pm

I hate really zoomed in pictures, they don't allow you to get the whole picture, especially with a developing storm.

There is just to much energy here not to develop into something

Image
0 likes   
Michael

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1133 Postby JonathanBelles » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:00 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:
KWT wrote:Yeah I can't see any outflow boundaries with the convection that is close to the circulation either for that matter...
Are you sure your not just seeing the CU lines flowing into the system and mistaking them for outflow boundaries?


I don't know...I'm not a pro at this... what I see is not exactly flowing into the system instead it's flowing over the system from east to west. perhaps someone can provide a better explanation as to what I am really seeing. Not that yours isn't adequate KWT.


Outflow boundaries flow out from a system, whether it is a single cell or a hurricane. An outflow boundary flows out of a system with the lift underneath it dissipates and lets the storm dissipate as well. Like KWT said, it looks like some upper level clouds just passing over the system.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#1134 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:04 pm

fact789 wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:
KWT wrote:Yeah I can't see any outflow boundaries with the convection that is close to the circulation either for that matter...
Are you sure your not just seeing the CU lines flowing into the system and mistaking them for outflow boundaries?


I don't know...I'm not a pro at this... what I see is not exactly flowing into the system instead it's flowing over the system from east to west. perhaps someone can provide a better explanation as to what I am really seeing. Not that yours isn't adequate KWT.


Outflow boundaries flow out from a system, whether it is a single cell or a hurricane. An outflow boundary flows out of a system with the lift underneath it dissipates and lets the storm dissipate as well. Like KWT said, it looks like some upper level clouds just passing over the system.


Thanks for the explanation.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1135 Postby SunnyThoughts » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:08 pm

Ivanhater wrote:I hate really zoomed in pictures, they don't allow you to get the whole picture, especially with a developing storm.

There is just to much energy here not to develop into something

Image



Yeah I think its cooking now. Just hope it heads west as a minimal ts or less...gives texas/mex some rain...and stays away from the part of the gom where the oil would be affected in any way.
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4227
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1136 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:10 pm

SunnyThoughts wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:I hate really zoomed in pictures, they don't allow you to get the whole picture, especially with a developing storm.

There is just to much energy here not to develop into something

Image



Yeah I think its cooking now. Just hope it heads west as a minimal ts or less...gives texas/mex some rain...and stays away from the part of the gom where the oil would be affected in any way.



couldnt have said it better myself :D
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1137 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:21 pm

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


The blob looks like it is getting more convection but it appears it is all moving westward towards the Yucatan/Central America with that strong ridge to the north, and since it is not a deep system at this point, is not able to really gain much lattitude. Question becomes whether there is enough time for it to develop into a named system before it runs out of real estate. I do think that whatever emerges in the BOC/WGOM could have a decent shot of becoming something named as the models support seems to be the greatest there. I'd say maybe a 60% chance at this point.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:28 pm, edited 4 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1138 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:23 pm

There is the 1006.7mb

Image
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145422
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1139 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:27 pm

Since I posted that the 8 PM TWO would be upped to 50% 2 hours ago,the system has continued to improve in organization,so I go up to 60%.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1140 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:27 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:
wx247 wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html

Outflow boundaries everywhere. FAIL


Maybe I am missing something, but I don't see them near the "LLC"... especially not everywhere. :?:


I see outflow boundary coming in from East to West in the convection east of the supposed circulation.


Outflow boundaries to the east of the center really means nothing in a developing system...and is to be expected. If outflow boundaries were moving OUT of the low...then that would be a FAIL. These boundaries aren't...
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests