ATL: KARL - Ex-Hurricane - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: Fairfax, VA
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143879
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
Definitly, the 2010 Atlantic season is breaking records and a good chunk is left. Who said it was a wimpy season? 

0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
cycloneye wrote:Definitly, the 2010 Atlantic season is breaking records and a good chunk is left. Who said it was a wimpy season?
Yep, this is one of the more active seasons I've ever seen.
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 348
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
Macrocane wrote:Actually I think that Alex is going to be retired, the mexican news showed really serious damages, it killed almost 30 people and it's considered one of the worst disasters in northeastern Mexico.
Agreed, I think Alex is going to be gone, and I notice that if that happens, there's an odd coincidence:
The first name to appear in this slot on this list was Allen, and it was retired on its first use.
Allen was replaced by the second name - Andrew - and Andrew was retired after its second use.
Alex - #3 - replaced Andrew, and if it's retired, that would mean it got retired upon its third use.
0 likes
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
in all my years of watching this is about the smallest soon to be major I have ever seen....a real compact storm...
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9476
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
If Karl becomes a major hurricane, it would be the fourth this month and fifth so far this season. I predicted 5 major hurricanes and we are barely over with it. I think we could see more major hurricanes once it is over. I think we could break the record of 8 major hurricanes set in 1950.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes
-
- Category 3
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
I think this will be another category 4 before landfall.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1703
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re:
Does anybody else get a Tracy vibe from this storm? If this plows directly through Veracruz, it could be disastrous. Lets hope it misses any major cities...
It's a very small storm, so if it hits the right area, it could avoid major damage in a heavily-populated area. Mudslides are another issue, but it's still better than a rapidly-intensifying major hurricane plowing directly through a major city.
Don't forget that intensities of storms back then were also often overstated because they didn't yet fully understand the relationship between flight-level and surface winds.
It's a very small storm, so if it hits the right area, it could avoid major damage in a heavily-populated area. Mudslides are another issue, but it's still better than a rapidly-intensifying major hurricane plowing directly through a major city.
RL3AO wrote:1950 had six straight majors (Able to Fox)
Of course in the 50's and 60's you can't rule out the probability of them missing a weak storm in there that would disrupt the streak.
Don't forget that intensities of storms back then were also often overstated because they didn't yet fully understand the relationship between flight-level and surface winds.
0 likes
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
Think I see signs of trochoidal wobbles in the eye. Could be signs of rapid intensification. At very least landfall area is going to get a storm that was undergoing intensification at this point (which should continue).
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1703
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re:
CrazyC83 wrote:A direct hit on Veracruz (or just south of, putting the RFQ over the city) would require a motion of about 260 the rest of the way.
That's definitely a possibility though...it's moving 270. And of course, that doesn't even take into account any sudden southwestward jogs it could take before landfall.
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4201
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion
this could be an absolute disaster. i hope the mexicans are ready down there.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests