ATL: EX Tropical Depression FIVE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#141 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:22 pm

however the Key west shows a interesting evolution..

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/key/Wrf/
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#142 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:47 pm

StormClouds63 wrote:At this point, perhaps a rain-maker, and not much else. Humberto and Edouard scenario unlikely?


Humberto is unlikely, but Edouard wasn't really that strong, the models aren't overly keen but they do suggest something weak developing. I dare say it will be just a rain maker, maybe a TD/low end TS based on the models at the moment.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#143 Postby ronjon » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:32 pm

12Z HWRF - moderate tropical storm into NO, although pressure is 988 mb at LF.

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2.cgi?time=2010080912-invest94l&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#144 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:53 pm

Yeah the HWRF hits at 30-35kts, which is pretty similar to what its been showing in its other recent runs.

GFDL doesn't really do anything with it...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145290
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#145 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:53 pm

18z Tropical Models

Code: Select all

 
WHXX01 KWBC 091851
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1851 UTC MON AUG 9 2010
 
DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.
 
ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR
 
DISTURBANCE INVEST (AL942010) 20100809 1800 UTC
 
        ...00 HRS...   ...12 HRS...   ...24 HRS. ..   ...36 HRS...
        100809  1800   100810  0600   100810  1800   100811  0600
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    26.2N  82.6W   26.1N  83.6W   26.4N  84.7W   26.7N  85.9W
BAMD    26.2N  82.6W   25.4N  83.9W   25.1N  85.2W   25.5N  86.6W
BAMM    26.2N  82.6W   25.8N  83.9W   25.9N  85.3W   26.2N  86.7W
LBAR    26.2N  82.6W   25.7N  83.9W   25.6N  85.6W   25.7N  87.5W
SHIP        20KTS          21KTS          25KTS          30KTS
DSHP        20KTS          21KTS          25KTS          30KTS
 
        ...48 HRS...   ...72 HRS...   ...96 HRS. ..   ..120 HRS...
        100811  1800   100812  1800   100813  1800   100814  1800
 
         LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON     LAT    LON
BAMS    27.5N  87.1W   29.3N  88.6W   31.0N  88.9W   32.8N  88.3W
BAMD    26.4N  88.2W   28.6N  91.2W   30.9N  93.4W   33.6N  94.2W
BAMM    27.0N  88.1W   29.0N  90.3W   31.1N  91.6W   33.6N  91.7W
LBAR    26.1N  89.6W   27.3N  93.6W   28.9N  96.8W   30.9N  98.6W
SHIP        35KTS          42KTS          47KTS          51KTS
DSHP        35KTS          42KTS          29KTS          27KTS
 
         ...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR =  26.2N LONCUR =  82.6W DIRCUR = 240DEG SPDCUR =   4KT
LATM12 =  26.5N LONM12 =  81.9W DIRM12 = 218DEG SPDM12 =   5KT
LATM24 =  27.5N LONM24 =  81.5W
WNDCUR =   20KT RMAXWD =   75NM WNDM12 =   20KT
CENPRS = 1011MB OUTPRS = 1013MB OUTRAD =  125NM SDEPTH =   S
RD34NE =    0NM RD34SE =    0NM RD34SW =    0NM RD34NW =   0NM
 
$$

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#146 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:58 pm

Models are very sluggish with development and only expecting a weak system to develop which is hard to argue against given the current set-up it has to deal with.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#147 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:26 pm

Nothing too exciting on the 12z euro
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#148 Postby southerngale » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:30 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Nothing too exciting on the 12z euro

What does it show? Or nothing at all?
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#149 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:34 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#150 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:38 pm

Pretty much the same as all the other models in that respect with a weak low developing.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#151 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:42 pm

Well this looks a lot like the Bonnie scenario a few weeks ago though (despite the models) I still think 94L has more potential then she did. I'm not saying anything major but just stronger system then she was. IMO
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#152 Postby Portastorm » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:03 pm

I'm still trying to figure out why model consensus at the moment is northwest into NOLA ... the ridge in the Deep South right now is stout based on what I saw on the CIMSS website. The GFS doesn't erode the ridge much this week which probably explains why it moves this system almost due west and parallels the coastline.

Is the ridge supposed to split or erode this week?
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#153 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:38 pm

Portastorm wrote:I'm still trying to figure out why model consensus at the moment is northwest into NOLA ... the ridge in the Deep South right now is stout based on what I saw on the CIMSS website. The GFS doesn't erode the ridge much this week which probably explains why it moves this system almost due west and parallels the coastline.

Is the ridge supposed to split or erode this week?


Best I can tell is the old frontal boundary allowing for a weakness to remain between the ridges, you can clearly see that boundary on the WV imagery which stretches NW from this low. If this was to remain fairly weak it easily just moves laong with the lower level flow, if it deepens more than the models are showing we got another ball game.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#154 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:46 pm

If the GFS is correct it takes our ULL westward across the northern Gulf toward TX during which time it is continually weakening. If our surface low sits that far south and the ULL passes by to its north all the while weakening this could get interesting for the upper Gulf Coast!

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.c ... =Animation
0 likes   

User avatar
Kludge
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 9:03 pm
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#155 Postby Kludge » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:53 pm

[quote="cycloneye"]18z Tropical Models


:uarrow: Seems most all of them have moved west from the 12Z runs. Could this be a trend?
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#156 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:53 pm

Dean has it right. Since this is still weak it is being steered by lower levels so the ridge is not having as much of an effect on the system. If it gets stronger the ridge in the upper levels would take more control in the steering and it would tend to come further West than currently progged.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#157 Postby Ivanhater » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:56 pm

18z Nam

Image
0 likes   
Michael

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#158 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Aug 09, 2010 3:58 pm

[quote="Ivanhater"]18z Nam

1000mb? That would be a healthy TS!!

And where did that other LOW to the NW at 1004mb come from?
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#159 Postby Portastorm » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:03 pm

Much obliged. Makes sense and explains why I couldn't see that northwest movement in conjunction with the 500mb flow depicted by the GFS. Thanks Dean!

Dean4Storms wrote:
Portastorm wrote:I'm still trying to figure out why model consensus at the moment is northwest into NOLA ... the ridge in the Deep South right now is stout based on what I saw on the CIMSS website. The GFS doesn't erode the ridge much this week which probably explains why it moves this system almost due west and parallels the coastline.

Is the ridge supposed to split or erode this week?


Best I can tell is the old frontal boundary allowing for a weakness to remain between the ridges, you can clearly see that boundary on the WV imagery which stretches NW from this low. If this was to remain fairly weak it easily just moves laong with the lower level flow, if it deepens more than the models are showing we got another ball game.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#160 Postby KWT » Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:06 pm

Kludge wrote:
cycloneye wrote:18z Tropical Models


:uarrow: Seems most all of them have moved west from the 12Z runs. Could this be a trend?


Yeah it sure does look like the models have trended somewhat westwards to me as well, makes sense given its emerged into the Gulf a little faster then the models were expecting (most models had it in the Gulf tomorrow.)
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests